edyvw
Thread starter
Originally Posted By: Quattro Pete
Originally Posted By: CapriRacer
First winter tires don't have age issues. That's because heat is the tire killer.
I have General Altimax Arctic for winter. I only put on about 1-2K miles on them each winter. After the first 3-4 years they stopped providing the same snow traction as they used to, despite still having most of their tread remaining. If it's not a rubber age issue, then what else can be causing this?
That is THE POINT!
Obviously some people here think that I am concern with whether tread belt is going to separate or steal belts are going to collapse. NO!
I know tires could do 10 years like that. Point is performance!
I bought top notch winter tire for a reason! If I wanted something else, if I was satisfied with something else, I would not pay $145 for 215/65 R16 tire, I would pay some $80 for Firestone Winterforce or General Altimax or Cooper os some other cheaper tire. I bought Nokian Hakka R2 because they are per testimonies and tests best in slush and my wife is not best driver in dry, and is dead afraid of snow (although she grew up in Chicago).
So, I am [censored], because I know that tire looses performance over time regardless whether it is mounted or not!
That is why I asked for FRESH tire. I left in that store in last 3 years probably $3000 for tires, so while I get argument that I should check, they should also pay attention. I hate that thing: I am customer I am always right. But i was just too tired that night (my 16 month old has stomach bug since Thanxgiving and constant issues, so I am sleep deprived). So the last thing on my mind was that after emphasizing that I want fresh tire, that I will get 2 1/2 year old tire.
Originally Posted By: CapriRacer
First winter tires don't have age issues. That's because heat is the tire killer.
I have General Altimax Arctic for winter. I only put on about 1-2K miles on them each winter. After the first 3-4 years they stopped providing the same snow traction as they used to, despite still having most of their tread remaining. If it's not a rubber age issue, then what else can be causing this?
That is THE POINT!
Obviously some people here think that I am concern with whether tread belt is going to separate or steal belts are going to collapse. NO!
I know tires could do 10 years like that. Point is performance!
I bought top notch winter tire for a reason! If I wanted something else, if I was satisfied with something else, I would not pay $145 for 215/65 R16 tire, I would pay some $80 for Firestone Winterforce or General Altimax or Cooper os some other cheaper tire. I bought Nokian Hakka R2 because they are per testimonies and tests best in slush and my wife is not best driver in dry, and is dead afraid of snow (although she grew up in Chicago).
So, I am [censored], because I know that tire looses performance over time regardless whether it is mounted or not!
That is why I asked for FRESH tire. I left in that store in last 3 years probably $3000 for tires, so while I get argument that I should check, they should also pay attention. I hate that thing: I am customer I am always right. But i was just too tired that night (my 16 month old has stomach bug since Thanxgiving and constant issues, so I am sleep deprived). So the last thing on my mind was that after emphasizing that I want fresh tire, that I will get 2 1/2 year old tire.
Last edited: