Originally Posted By: 21Rouge
Originally Posted By: dparm
Their PDSes were all updated within the last few months because of the formula tweaks.
Of course I might be mistaken but the PDS I see for the 0W30 shows the same #s as I have seen for the last couple of years...I think.
I haven't noticed any change either.
One thing that doesn't add up is the tech's claim that they use base oils with a VI of 220 but the end product has a VI of 193 and requires VII's to achieve that. Perhaps what he meant to say
was that one of the base oils in the formulation has a VI of 220; that I'd believe.
Originally Posted By: dparm
Their PDSes were all updated within the last few months because of the formula tweaks.
Of course I might be mistaken but the PDS I see for the 0W30 shows the same #s as I have seen for the last couple of years...I think.
I haven't noticed any change either.
One thing that doesn't add up is the tech's claim that they use base oils with a VI of 220 but the end product has a VI of 193 and requires VII's to achieve that. Perhaps what he meant to say
was that one of the base oils in the formulation has a VI of 220; that I'd believe.