Let's see if I can communicate this clearly:
Earlier, a poster mentioned SBC engines dying sooner with just a bypass system rather than a full flow (normal) system.
Don't bypass systems characteristically filter only 5% - 10% of pumped oil?
Ergo, 90% - 95% of the oil isn't filtered in the engines which the poster said wore out sooner.
This could be all the 'data' we got!
Isn't circulating unfiltered oil comparable to leaving it in longer?
NOTE of IRONY: On a board where cleansing compounds and conflicting chemistry is discussed in depth, contributors to this thread are talking about "sparklies" in the oil. From the micro to the macro.
It could be time to rely on the "dirty is better than clean" model.
Said model has more merit than "do what makes you sleep better at night" snottiness.
Earlier, a poster mentioned SBC engines dying sooner with just a bypass system rather than a full flow (normal) system.
Don't bypass systems characteristically filter only 5% - 10% of pumped oil?
Ergo, 90% - 95% of the oil isn't filtered in the engines which the poster said wore out sooner.
This could be all the 'data' we got!
Isn't circulating unfiltered oil comparable to leaving it in longer?
NOTE of IRONY: On a board where cleansing compounds and conflicting chemistry is discussed in depth, contributors to this thread are talking about "sparklies" in the oil. From the micro to the macro.
It could be time to rely on the "dirty is better than clean" model.
Said model has more merit than "do what makes you sleep better at night" snottiness.