Originally Posted By: The_Eric
Originally Posted By: Miller88
Originally Posted By: Brad_C
Originally Posted By: Miller88
I am not convinced, nor will I ever be convinced, that a belt is ever a better solution than a chain for driving a camshaft.
Luckily you don't have to be convinced for manufacturers to keep making great motors.
I understand there are a lot of DIY'ers here, I am one as well. If I owned an engine with a timing belt, I would be the one to change it. I would also be worrying once I got near the change interval that it would break, too. They have a habit of snapping or breaking a pulley once the change interval is near.
At least some are now pushing 150K mile replacements (oil bathed). I like that a bit better as most vehicles up here rust out before 150K
What about someone who is not a DIY'er and may not be that well off. Do you think they can pony up the $1000 to have a shop change the timing belt? Or what about on cases like the Aveo ... I have a friend in a similar situation - won't change the belt on his accord because he doesn't have $1000 to have a shop change it.
The good news is - most engines no longer use timing belts. I believe it's a result of trying to lower overall maintenance costs.
Oh bologna!
A habit of breaking a pulley when the change interval is near? Bunk!
An oil bathed timing belt? News to me... I've seen a few in the aftermarket for performance V8 applications, but never one OE. There are and have been many manufacturers doing 120k+ service intervals though.
A grand to change a t-belt on an Accord? Seems high. How much extra maintenance is being suggested?
Ford installed an oil bathed timing belt in the 1.0 Ecoboost.