Is Red Line the primo oil?

Status
Not open for further replies.
quote:

Originally posted by buster:
No one mentioned esters competing with anti-wear additives as a reason for RL's poor UOA showing.

Hmmm. Since many seem to think this, I guess I will wait until I go back to Amsoil Euro to try the LM Ceratec additive I have. I don't know, how much ester is too much ester??
dunno.gif
 
quote:

Originally posted by Pablo:
I don't have my "panties in a bunch". I am not "paranoid" either. You wrote "Looks like RedLine is a relative bargain compared to Amsoil." and anyone reading this at the top of the page needs to to be set straight. That is what I was attempting to do.

Some attempt. When I ask for a price:
quote:

Originally posted by 427Z06:
Pabs, what if I only want 5 qts of SERIES 2000 0W-30. According to this site, it'll cost me $8.88/qt plus tax and shipping?

You respond:
quote:

Originally posted by Pablo:
427 - Actually it's even more than that for single quarts at catalog prices.

So if it's more than that, what am I to conclude? That I need to know the secret handshake and password, and buy in massive quantities to get the "special price"? But instead informing me of my possible incorrect conclusion, you go into attack mode with:
quote:

Originally posted by Pablo:
427 I know you don't like Amsoil, but why do spend so much time telling the world...

I'll give you the benefit of the doubt, AGAIN. But would you stop doing this in the future?
 
I am sorry for the "attack mode". You are "firm" with Amsoil as you should be. Sometimes I don't see this same stance with other brands, but maybe I miss that.

I guess my other problem is that I take each post as a singularity without context, because I try to read the pages as if I'm a newbie. I knew you were talking about S2K pricing (Reg catalog $9.45 qt each!! (yikes!!!!)) - but I assume that a newbie punching into page 2 wouldn't know what oil, and would think every Amsoil motor oil is more expensive than Redline, which simply is not the case.

Again sorry. See PM
 
Buster,

Do you have a link the Shell XOM comments?

The GC "esters" are considered less polar?
 
I don't have the links. One of them was from an older article talking about M1 VTwin and the other was from a magazine. GC is PAO with esters. RL is majority POE. Two different oils.
 
I wanted to add that if RL was causing excessive wear, it's reputation wouldn't be what it is. RL gets a lot of feedback from engine builders and racing teams.
 
Good read:

quote:

Meanwhile back in the aircraft industry a new breed of plastic lubricants called poly-ol esters had been developed for gas turbine use. Poly-ol ester lubricants are so strong that jet engines are filled with the lubricant when built and it remains in there for the life of the engine. Additive packages are replaced and renewed, but this base oil is so immensely strong that it can cope with the tremendous pressure and heat conditions without any degradation. The downside of this product is that it is expensive. For a lubricant to last the lifetime of an engine costing £1.0M, this is of no odds. Needless to say, oil company competition departments soon got hold of these products, although never in their wildest dreams would the accountants allow such a lubricant to be produced commercially - it actually cost something to produce, rather than being a free by-product of another process. The poly-ol esters are not only very very strong, but they replicate the viscosity change of the ideal engine lubricants with temperature, e.g. acting as a 20W50, without the addition of viscosity modifiers.

The dream lubricant had arrived for race engine designers. This lubricant not only fits the required viscosity profiles perfectly without additives - long chain viscosity modifiers not only break down quickly, but in high compression engines cause varnishing and detonation problems, but is extremely slippery, causing wondrous reductions in power sapping friction losses. The oil is almost impossible to aerate, meaning small oil tanks are possible. It has phenomenal film strength, around five times that of an equivalent weight mineral oil, so that a far lighter weight oil can be used to further cut frictional losses, pump sizes and oil pipe diameters. Poly-ol esters also have magnificent heat transfer properties to cut oil cooler sizes. Just when the Formula 1 designer was desperate to fit every mechanical part into the slimmest possible tube to allow the maximum ground-effect undertray size, along came an oil which allowed down-sizing of every oil system component. Road oil and race oil had parted company again.

Poly-ol ester lubricants really came into their own with the advent of the F1 turbo engine. 1500cc developing 1200 bhp. Maybe if the old adage 'The older I get, the faster I was.' is true, there really were 1500 bhp qualifying engines. Certainly the phrase '1000 bhp per litre' has a certain ring to it. Those of us who were stood at the Woodcote chicane for final qualifying for the 1985 British Grand Prix, when Keke Rosberg took pole position with an engine that melted its cylinder heads as he went across the line, have a sneaking feeling it might have been true. Gas turbine oil was well within its operating envelope in such conditions. The oil that lubricated that Honda engine in the Williams was called Mugen Oil and is spoken of in whispers in paddocks around the world, even today, as the answer to a fast lap in qualifying. It was produced by the Mobil competition department and still circulates at very inflated prices. (Indeed, I suspect that there is far more Mugen Oil in use now than was ever produced then, which is an interesting thought to folks who have paid big money for an unmarked can) In today's terms Mugen Oil is a fairly conventional 30 weight poly-ol ester, with the interesting addition of fish oil for certain applications. Yes, it does smell particularly dreadful, but there is a belief in the orient that it is a good slipperiness additive.

Poly-ol ester lubricants are still the very best lubricants available. All oil company competition departments have their own particular variations for their own sponsored teams. A steady stream of poly-ol ester oils leave these departments and trickle down to all other levels of racing. The club racer who has a friend, who has a friend, who has got him a special from high street company X competition department, has probably got a poly-ol ester lubricant. The danger of course is that the friend has got a free sample of gearbox oil, designed to run with silicon oil seals. He then puts this magic oil in his engine and is surprised and amazed when the oil complete with dissolved rubber oil seals and a couple of pistons in kit form fall out on the road, closely followed by the camshaft. Be warned also: race oils do not contain detergents, another cause of detonation in high compression engines. With no detergent package in your oil you can soon block oilways with the sludge from a bunch of cold starts.

Do you need a poly-ol ester oil for road use? If you are reading this, then you are interested in getting the best out of, and for, your vehicle, or you may be at the dentist. Poly-ol ester based lubricants have the advantage that your engine will never wear them out. They are as useful in a old wrecker with piston rings hanging off and bearing shells dropping out as in a multi-thousand pound race engine. Another useful property of the oil is that it does not break down in storage, as does a mineral oil. A vehicle may be left for years with the oil in the sump, and started up as fresh as a daisy when needed. Added to this is the extreme stickiness of the oil, which coats all parts with which it comes into contact and does not creep off, as do other 'synthetics'. For this reason many invaluable vintage, veteran and classic vehicles use nothing else. High street oil companies use poly-ol esters as additives - a very recent marketing exercise suggests that a wondrous new breakthrough in chemical engineering has developed this sticky oil additive, indeed magnet like, which when added to a mineral oil base produces a significant lubrication technology break-through! This semi-synthetic product retails at virtually the same price as poly-ol ester based lubricants! The synthetic brand leader, Mobil 1, is 'tri-synthetic', a mixture of PAO, di-ester and poly-ol ester and indeed brags on the can about jet engine technology. Unfortunately for the discerning motorist, the marketing men have decided that in the small UK market we only deserve one of the wide range of Mobil 1 synthetics available in the US, which cannot suit all engines.

There is one company that produces nothing but poly-ol ester based lubricants. The ethos of the firm is that the best lubricant base combined with the best additive package will be produced, regardless of cost, as there will always be a market for the unqualified highest quality. Based in the competition market, and suppliers to all race championships from Formula 1 through to boat racing, and including even bar stool racing! Red Line® Synthetic Oil Corporation in California also produce a wide range of road oils for engines and gearboxes, all poly-ol ester based. You are unlikely ever to find Red Line oil in Halfords, but you will find it sold by the major competition and classic car parts suppliers; Demon Tweeks, for instance, being a typical mail order outlet for Red Line in Europe. Red Line supply product and technical support to race engine and gearbox designers to allow maximum advantage to be taken of the poly-ol esters' attributes and are in the forefront of lubricant development. Within the UK, the home of race car development, Delta Oil, the European distributor for Red Line run a technical sales department which is open to enquiries from anyone wanting advice on poly-ol ester lubricants - 01572 678311 or E-mail [email protected]. Full product technical specifications are available on the Internet: www.redlineoil.com. I personally have taken a call from a gentleman suffering from a rattling Skoda engine, immediately followed by a call from a Formula 1 team - we were able to help both of them.

 
I suspect that Redline racing oils may be 100% POE, but their street oils are 50/50 POE and PAO.
 
Here is a paragraph from Redline's website:

"Red Line Oil’s team of chemists and blenders formulate fully-synthetic oils and chemically-advanced additives using only the world’s finest base stocks. This makes Red Line Oil the premium product on the shelf. It’s not designed to be the cheapest—it’s built to be the best. Rather than cutting costs by blending into polyalphaolefin base stock for its motor oil, Red Line Oil only uses superior poly ester-based products—resulting in lubricants that are extremely stable at high temperatures while providing superior film strength at lower viscosities where more power can be produced."

According to this, their motor oil is 100% POE based. It is a rather clumsy rhetorical trick on their part, though, to imply that PAO is a lesser base because it is less expensive. That logic doesn't follow. POE might be superior in some ways, for some purposes, but not because it costs more.

Having criticized their advertising because, well, almost all advertising for any product is inherently dishonest in some way, I nonetheless use Redline and think it is fantastic oil. The best, though? Who knows? Not me.
 
So, anyone know what is up with their racing oils? Since they both seem to be more or less 100% POE, is the add pack the only thing seperating them?

Is their any VOA's of their racing oil?
 
quote:

Rather than cutting costs by blending into polyalphaolefin base stock for its motor oil, Red Line Oil only uses superior poly ester-based products ...

You can infer that this phrase means their oils are 100% POE, but it certainly doesn't say that. This phrase has several problems, not the least of which is its grammatical abusrdity. And just what are "poly ester-based products"? If you use nothing but 100% polyol esters, why not just say that unequivocally: "Redline uses only 100% polyol ester base oils."

Here's another quote from the Redline web site: "Red Line's products are unique because they contain polyol ester base stocks, the only lubricants which can withstand the tremendous heat of modern jet engines." See the ambiguity? Does this sentence mean that Redline oils only "contain" POE base stocks? Or does it mean they are made only from POE base stocks?
 
quote:

Originally posted by Alcibiades:
Here is a paragraph from Redline's website:

"Red Line Oil’s team of chemists and blenders formulate fully-synthetic oils and chemically-advanced additives using only the world’s finest base stocks. This makes Red Line Oil the premium product on the shelf. It’s not designed to be the cheapest—it’s built to be the best. Rather than cutting costs by blending into polyalphaolefin base stock for its motor oil, Red Line Oil only uses superior poly ester-based products—resulting in lubricants that are extremely stable at high temperatures while providing superior film strength at lower viscosities where more power can be produced."

According to this, their motor oil is 100% POE based. It is a rather clumsy rhetorical trick on their part, though, to imply that PAO is a lesser base because it is less expensive. That logic doesn't follow. POE might be superior in some ways, for some purposes, but not because it costs more.

Having criticized their advertising because, well, almost all advertising for any product is inherently dishonest in some way, I nonetheless use Redline and think it is fantastic oil. The best, though? Who knows? Not me.


Contact Redline. Ask the question. See what you get back. You need to read ad copy very, very carefully before you draw any black-and-white conclusions.
cheers.gif
 
Look at it this way. Amsoil/Mobil 1 tout being a PAO based oil. Both have approx. 80% PAO with the rest being esters/AN/additives as stated by Molekule in the past. RL's contains a majority POE basestock with the rest being PAO. RL would clearly market itself as a predominately POE based oil, bc it is. Whether it's 55% or 70% is anyone's guess, but the fact is POE is the "primary" basestock. I would also agree with G-Man in that the racing oils are probably 100% esters.

*ekpolk, I have contacted them and that was what I was told.
 
This is what Dave had to say in response to my email inquiry on the subject: "Our primary base stock is the polyol ester, we do use some PAO." That eliminates some of the ambiguity, but certainly not all.

The original question is pretty subjective, but for the most part, I think it's a pricey, but very good product.
cheers.gif
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top