Forums Migration

Please read this thread

Recent Topics
BEST Oil Filter for 2020
by DCMotorsports - 07/07/20 12:39 PM
1997 Lancruiser/Colorado/
4Runner wishbone bolt

by Kamele0N - 07/07/20 12:33 PM
why change oil on low mileage car consuming oil
by NewC-05 - 07/07/20 11:50 AM
Which oil to use?
by HydroxZ - 07/07/20 11:02 AM
What oil for supercharged Lotus Exige?
by mkiv808 - 07/07/20 10:59 AM
Carb Metering Diaphrams
by Fordiesel69 - 07/07/20 10:30 AM
ABS Brake Bleeder/Pulsate Software?
by shibby6600 - 07/07/20 10:30 AM
NAPA Gold vs. WIX
by DCMotorsports - 07/07/20 10:11 AM
A/C symptoms-what to do?
by sipman - 07/07/20 09:59 AM
M1 and Liqui Moly - can I mix?
by ssoH - 07/07/20 08:47 AM
HF JACK-STAND RECALL EXPANDED
by demarpaint - 07/07/20 08:15 AM
Five Euro Car Myths?
by BMWTurboDzl - 07/07/20 07:46 AM
Trust Funds
by stockrex - 07/07/20 07:28 AM
3 on the tree
by Chris142 - 07/07/20 07:21 AM
ROCKAUTO selling old expired stock.
by nicholas - 07/07/20 07:21 AM
Amsoil SS 5w30
by mpgo4th - 07/07/20 06:57 AM
Water/Coolant Contamination?
by nastyc5 - 07/07/20 06:53 AM
07 Tahoe trans fluid change.
by Anthony - 07/07/20 06:06 AM
Ravenol 15W40 Marine
by Realfine69 - 07/07/20 05:10 AM
2020 VW 0W20??
by Realfine69 - 07/07/20 05:06 AM
Newest Members
HydroxZ, JDMorgan, sycboi, Chuck_Ellison, BakonBittz
71871 Registered Users
Who's Online Now
105 registered members (55hambone, 28oz, 4WD, antone, Anthony, ABerns, 12 invisible), 2,099 guests, and 26 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums67
Topics307,552
Posts5,313,039
Members71,871
Most Online4,538
Jan 20th, 2020
Donate to BITOG
Print Thread
Hop To
737 NG cracks ? #5234457 10/09/19 04:14 AM
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 323
E
Exhaustgases Offline OP
OP Offline
E
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 323
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HqR55tfIr7Y

That must be a good sized part and very difficult to remove and replace. Any one know what all is involved in doing that?

I would be real curious how many old slide rule, designed aircraft had AD's on cracks? Could be more proof that the modern computer fea and other systems are not all that great after all. Its just crazy to see some of the design work on something like the old C97 engine mounts and what they had to take, then there was the structure in the wing nacelle's. Those old timer engineers where the best.

Last edited by Exhaustgases; 10/09/19 04:22 AM.
Re: 737 NG cracks ? [Re: Exhaustgases] #5234635 10/09/19 08:32 AM
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 14,486
K
kschachn Online Content
Online Content
K
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 14,486
Originally Posted by Exhaustgases
I would be real curious how many old slide rule, designed aircraft had AD's on cracks? Could be more proof that the modern computer fea and other systems are not all that great after all. Its just crazy to see some of the design work on something like the old C97 engine mounts and what they had to take, then there was the structure in the wing nacelle's. Those old timer engineers where the best.

They all do. There are many structural crack related ADs for legacy airplanes, even those that are typically considered "overbuilt" like those from McDonnell Douglas.


1994 BMW 530i, 253K
1996 Honda Accord, 289K
1999 Toyota Sienna, 437K
2000 Toyota ECHO, 290K
Re: 737 NG cracks ? [Re: Exhaustgases] #5234642 10/09/19 08:39 AM
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 1,845
R
ragtoplvr Online Content
Online Content
R
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 1,845
Aluminum has a fatigue life. Then it cracks. it is well understood and predictable within limits.

Everything has a life time.

Rod

Re: 737 NG cracks ? [Re: Exhaustgases] #5235341 10/09/19 10:08 PM
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 323
E
Exhaustgases Offline OP
OP Offline
E
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 323
I know those 131 Hercules had some problems keeping the wings on.
I don't think any of the old designed Boeing planes had the problems we are seeing now, with the NG cracks and the Max 8. I guess there was the control valve issue with an older boeing plane. But how about 707 and 720's? They seemed to be some of the best Boeing planes.

Re: 737 NG cracks ? [Re: Exhaustgases] #5235769 10/10/19 10:53 AM
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 14,486
K
kschachn Online Content
Online Content
K
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 14,486
Originally Posted by Exhaustgases
I know those 131 Hercules had some problems keeping the wings on.
I don't think any of the old designed Boeing planes had the problems we are seeing now, with the NG cracks and the Max 8. I guess there was the control valve issue with an older boeing plane. But how about 707 and 720's? They seemed to be some of the best Boeing planes.

There are many airworthiness directives for the 707, you can go to the FAA website and see them if you wish.

Another consideration is that for old airplanes there are repair assessment programs and aging aircraft tasks required to preclude failures and subsequent ADs. So even if there isn't a structural AD for something there still can be extensive inspections and repairs required for airframe safety. As an aside, for the 707 compared to the DC-8 many of these assessments are required at a lower threshold and increased frequency for the 707 compared to the legacy Douglas product.


1994 BMW 530i, 253K
1996 Honda Accord, 289K
1999 Toyota Sienna, 437K
2000 Toyota ECHO, 290K
Re: 737 NG cracks ? [Re: Exhaustgases] #5235886 10/10/19 12:46 PM
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 5,636
C
CourierDriver Offline
Offline
C
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 5,636
Originally Posted by Exhaustgases
I know those 131 Hercules had some problems keeping the wings on.
I don't think any of the old designed Boeing planes had the problems we are seeing now, with the NG cracks and the Max 8. I guess there was the control valve issue with an older boeing plane. But how about 707 and 720's? They seemed to be some of the best Boeing planes.

Maybe the engineers should go back to the old school of flying and let the pilot do more without all the automatic flying computers....our WW2 B17s made it from England to Germany just fine...


I'd still like to have my 67 Beetle back....life was easy then..imho
Re: 737 NG cracks ? [Re: Exhaustgases] #5235899 10/10/19 12:53 PM
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 21,235
MolaKule Offline
Global Moderator
Offline
Global Moderator
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 21,235
Originally Posted by Exhaustgases
...Could be more proof that the modern computer fea and other systems are not all that great after all. Its just crazy to see some of the design work on something like the old C97 engine mounts and what they had to take, then there was the structure in the wing nacelle's. Those old timer engineers where the best.


I did Finite Element Analysis (FEA) and Dynamics Analysis on the 777 and there is nothing wrong with FEA. However, the engineer has to have a good understanding of Structural Analysis and Aeroelasticity. The old adage of, "Garbage In, Garbage Out" also applies here.

Slide rule analysis was good to two or three decimal points, FEA is good to 64 bits or higher precision.

The older planes were designed with slide rules but there was a lot of "added strength" fudge-factors going on (because of uncertainties in analysis) so the planes were a lot heavier than needed. Ever watch the Buffalo Airways segment on the Weather Channel? http://www.buffaloairways.com/

In addition, Strength of Material's testing machines are a lot more sophisticated today than they were in the 40's and 50's so better material's data can be fed into the FEA suite.


"So many shows out there dumb-down the country. It's so admirable to be part of a show that wants people to think." (David Krumholtz 'Charlie Epps' of NUMB3RS)
Re: 737 NG cracks ? [Re: Exhaustgases] #5236084 10/10/19 04:06 PM
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 15,538
C
CT8 Offline
Offline
C
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 15,538
CAD design allows engineering to remove any extra durability when manufacturing parts,,,, no? I have a friend whos life time career at United Airlines MOC in SF as an A&P would say planes gained weight as they age due to the repairs. Planes see lots of stresses even with the most mundane operations.


2015 F150 2.7
2018 F350 6.2
Re: 737 NG cracks ? [Re: CT8] #5236516 10/11/19 01:17 AM
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 21,235
MolaKule Offline
Global Moderator
Offline
Global Moderator
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 21,235
Originally Posted by CT8
CAD design allows engineering to remove any extra durability when manufacturing parts,,,, no? I have a friend whos life time career at United Airlines MOC in SF as an A&P would say planes gained weight as they age due to the repairs. Planes see lots of stresses even with the most mundane operations.


CAD manf. allows excess material to be removed which reduces weight and CNC allows a higher precision in manf.


"So many shows out there dumb-down the country. It's so admirable to be part of a show that wants people to think." (David Krumholtz 'Charlie Epps' of NUMB3RS)
Re: 737 NG cracks ? [Re: MolaKule] #5237061 10/11/19 02:19 PM
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 323
E
Exhaustgases Offline OP
OP Offline
E
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 323
Originally Posted by MolaKule
Originally Posted by Exhaustgases
...Could be more proof that the modern computer fea and other systems are not all that great after all. Its just crazy to see some of the design work on something like the old C97 engine mounts and what they had to take, then there was the structure in the wing nacelle's. Those old timer engineers where the best.


I did Finite Element Analysis (FEA) and Dynamics Analysis on the 777 and there is nothing wrong with FEA. However, the engineer has to have a good understanding of Structural Analysis and Aeroelasticity. The old adage of, "Garbage In, Garbage Out" also applies here.

Slide rule analysis was good to two or three decimal points, FEA is good to 64 bits or higher precision.

The older planes were designed with slide rules but there was a lot of "added strength" fudge-factors going on (because of uncertainties in analysis) so the planes were a lot heavier than needed. Ever watch the Buffalo Airways segment on the Weather Channel? http://www.buffaloairways.com/

In addition, Strength of Material's testing machines are a lot more sophisticated today than they were in the 40's and 50's so better material's data can be fed into the FEA suite.



If it wasn't for the "old guys" and the stress analysis techniques that they developed, what 100 years or so in the past FEA would not exist. Slide rule accuracy?
Yeah I actually know how to use one so. In the ww2 days they also started using mechanical calculators and into the 60's, that where much more accurate than slide rules, I mentioned slide rules to point out what was accomplished by people that actually knew what they were doing and didn't have fancy computers and software to make up for lack of knowledge like what exists nowadays.

Previous Thread
Index
Next Thread

BOB IS THE OIL GUY® Powered by UBB.threads™