Originally Posted By: Artem
I've been doing early changes on the past 4 new vehicles I bought. Oldest is a 98 Camry V6 sludge motor with now 300k on the clock. Runs like a Swiss army watch.
It makes sense logically to flush out the break-in metals and get the engine settled as quickly as possible. Why drag it out by running say, 50ppm of iron for example for 5,000 miles, followed by an oil change and then 20ppm of iron for another 5k miles, followed by an oil change and then 10ppm of iron, followed by yet another oil change to finally settle in the single digit 5ppm after 15,000 miles+ when I can achieve those results by flushing it out early and have a clean block from 5k miles until she rusts away...?
If the engine naturally produces say, 5ppm of iron every 5k miles, why would I want 30ppm of break-in metallic paste floating around? Doesn't make sense to me.
I agree, as I just did the first oil change on my Corvette at 1100 miles and the UOA already showed 48ppm of iron and 124ppm of silicon. Why would I want that stuff to keep floating around in there and accumulating even more? Plus I already had 2% fuel dilution (probably a combination of the DI with a lot of idling time as the car got moved around the factory and on and off transport trucks, etc.) The factory fill M1 5w30 had already thinned out to 5w20. Considering the fact that GM is now recommending 0w40 for this engine (and factory filling the 2019s with it) I don't think it's wise to have such a thin oil in there.
I also think that I won't go too far on the second oil change, maybe 3000 miles at the most. I just want to be sure that fuel dilution is not going to be an issue before I start blindly trusting the OLM.
In fact, I have sort of changed my tune recently, I was doing 10k intervals with my Civic and even further with my wife's car, but I really don't think I was doing those engines any favors with such long intervals. I'm not advocating 3k intervals by any means, but I'm now thinking that my comfort zone is closer to 6k.