The people have spoken. They want the fuel economy comparable to a small car, but they want to sit up higher, cram more stuff in the back, and run over curbs without high-centering.
Have to admit that Jeep did a good job with the current Grand Cherokee....from a looks standpoint, anyway. It's a handsome, broad-shouldered SUV with impressive off-road abilities (used by 5% of consumers). I can't speak for the quality, but they look good.
The original Compass should've never happened. End of sentence.
Now that they've made the Compass look almost exactly like big brother Grand Cherokee, I can see one in traffic without cringing or eye pain, and can understand the appeal. I don't need such a vehicle, but there are plenty out there that are convinced they do. I'm neither here nor there on the Cherokee, although the facelift helped, IMO.
I normally stay on top of the changes that occur from generation to generation of vehicles, but the Wrangler has just fallen off my radar. Certain people (American muscle car fans, usually) complain that the Porsche 911 never seems to change. That's how I feel about the Wrangler. But the same argument applies....why mess with a successful recipe?
I was put off the Wrangler many generations ago when my best friend had one, and I needed a chiropractic visit after every ride I took with him. I'm sure that situation is better now, but again, I have no use for a vehicle like that.
Kudos to Jeep for their success. It'd be nice to see Toyota taken down a notch or two.