I really appreciate all the great comments on my failing engine, but doesn't 10K miles on conventional oil equal planned obsolescence? I see there is some debate on how long to run conventional oil. My first three oil changes were done as per the Maintenance Minder's recommendation at 10346, 10178, and 10192 miles despite me voicing my concerns to my dealer and asking about running synthetic oil. A Mobil hotline rep told me that the Mobil Super oil used in my Pilot will lubricate for 5000 miles and much longer, but the additives will start to break down after the 5000 mile mark and end up sticking to the inside of the engine. Today the dealer clarified that the "sludge" he found on the valve train was more like heavy varnish. With 30,000 miles a year and much of that at 75 MPH on the highway, I believe we can rule out 'short trip condensation'. The only cause that makes sense to me is that the oil was indeed breaking down over the lifetime of the motor. I'm burning no significant oil so where else would the heavy varnish come from?
The basic warranty on this oil is 5000 miles but Mobil does defer to the manufacturer's recommendation beyond that. So it seems to me that Mobil is letting Honda dictate how long their oil will run in my Pilot. And Honda is telling me to run that oil more than twice, yes TWICE, the manufacturer's base recommendation! This does not feel like automotive engineering, it feels like business politics. I would say that Mobil is not at fault here except they are letting Honda have control over their oil longevity. But not really, because the oil is simply not lasting. I'm guessing here, but I'll bet you a beer that Honda profits more on vehicle repairs and vehicle replacements then on regular vehicle maintenance. So, as much as it pains me, I have to ask the question, "Is more than doubling an oil change interval part of a larger strategy of planned obsolescence, in addition to the marketing strategy of an engine running on less maintenance".
I have also been told that some auto manufacturers specify a lighter oil to get better gas mileage, which is of course a very important competitive advantage. Is this another contributing factor to my engine's demise? I would not find this hard to believe considering the tires which came with my vehicle seemed to be designed for good mileage and nothing else.
I understand that Honda started specifying a Super-Synthetic hybrid oil blend for the 2011 model year, yet their engine technology had not apparently changed that much since my 2009 model. So why the better oil, Honda, too many vehicles failing before their planned departure date?
Incidentally, some folks have suggested that I should know better then to let the oil run so long. I do - my Chevy Savanna van gets heavy use we change its synthetic oil every 5000 miles. I checked today and it has over 160k miles and NO varnish. In the case of my Honda I deferred to my dealer because I was concerned about following his recommendation to maintain the warranty.
I believe I have been a bit too trusting here and the above issues have been conspiring to foul and fail an engine that should have lasted at least twice as long as its 90K miles, if not more. Because this situation likely started when the vehicle was well under warranty, I did in fact escalate this to Honda America . They told me to have the Maintenance Minder diagnosed by the dealer. Trouble is, my dealer has no such service procedure. The dealers response is to speak with their local Honda Rep next week. Stay tuned, friends.