So, the guys who say, “I’d rather have a chain than a belt” must love this engine, right? Certainly, Audi engineers thought a chain was better than a belt…
So, the guys who say, “I’d rather have a chain than a belt” must love this engine, right? Certainly, Audi engineers thought a chain was better than a belt…
Is there a way to actually check a timing chain? Any that I had, by the time you get the cover off to see how far the tensioner moved you might as well change it at that point?But I would be checking at about 100,000.
There is on the Mercedes, and some of the engines with which I’m familiar. You can see the chain stretch because the timing marks between the two cylinder banks don’t lineup.Is there a way to actually check a timing chain? Any that I had, by the time you get the cover off to see how far the tensioner moved you might as well change it at that point?
I ran a olds 3.1, a Jeep 4.7 and a Ford 4.6 all past 200K with no indication of any pending timing chain issue.
My Xterra Timing chain "failed" at around 240K?. It was a known defect - Dana stamped the links and they used their die's too long and caused burrs. The burrs caused the chain to wear out the guides, and you knew because it would start to whine off idle. The redesign was supposed to eliminate the burrs, and they added something to the links to help them hold lubrication better as well. Its supposed to be lifetime. My Frontier has the same engine with the redesigned chain - we will see how long it lasts. The Xterra got the new OEM chain - so it now has 150K ish on it also?
Some engines will have a rattle at startup but Audi says it's OK. I don't think chains have been an issue on these engines if they have had regular oil changes.So, the guys who say, “I’d rather have a chain than a belt” must love this engine, right? Certainly, Audi engineers thought a chain was better than a belt…
You measure the wear and compare it to the factory manual condemnation criteria. Sometimes an offset key can be installed, but generally a replacement should be installed.How do you know if your timing chain is going bad, will it trip a trouble code?
Some will show cam correlation codes if things get out of whack enough.How do you know if your timing chain is going bad, will it trip a trouble code?
Well...So, the guys who say, “I’d rather have a chain than a belt” must love this engine, right? Certainly, Audi engineers thought a chain was better than a belt…
Yup, you could stack the display vertically. If the traces for the individual cylinders were offset a bit, but lined up when you increased the RPM, that indicated a stretched timing chain.I haven't checked timing chain stretch since around 1980, turning the crankshaft bolt CW/CCW and watching the distributor shaft rotation. There was a time when you could infer chain stretch on a scope secondary raster pattern. Not a concrete check as even new chains would stretch a bit after being run.
There were no tensioners back in those days - just a chain between the crank and cam - so nothing to take up the slack like they have now. Of course the chain was also 1/10 the length.In the old days of V8s, the rule of thumb was the timing chain needs to be replaced if you can move the dampner 10° back and forth with no movement in the cam as seen at the distributor.
Its very engine design specific.How do you know if your timing chain is going bad, will it trip a trouble code?
My Traverse tripped the dreaded "camshaft position error" code, which was the telltale sign that the the troublesome timing chains are wearing out. It made it to 170,000 miles before that came up, but some people were getting worn out chains in 50-60,000 miles since the engine in it was famous for worn timing chains.How do you know if your timing chain is going bad, will it trip a trouble code?
I don't think belts were an option with that much stuff going on in there? Plus how many extra holes and seals to leak on the side of the engine? Chains are narrower for the load they carry.So, the guys who say, “I’d rather have a chain than a belt” must love this engine, right? Certainly, Audi engineers thought a chain was better than a belt…
Gott im Himmel!