Originally Posted by dnewton3
Originally Posted by JeffKeryk
... By the way, the cars do not need an hour to charge. They need enough charge to get to their destination.
The Tesla Model 3 Long Range can charge from 10-80% in as little as 30 minutes from a 120kW Tesla Supercharger, while the Standard Range Plus will do it in even less than that.
Having said that, 30 minutes is an eternity as compared to 3 to 4 minutes fill up at Costco.
That's true.
But your point is also true of gasoline/diesel. If you only need to travel 30 miles, then you may only need two or three gallons and not a "fill up". It's all relative.
But we're trying to compare apples to apples here; to "top off" to a level of "full" capacity of range. A full fill for a car/truck is FAR shorter than a full charge for a EV. And a "only gotta get 20 miles" gallon is far shorter in refuel time than perhaps 15 minutes on the charger for an EV. In a society that puts a premium on "gotta have it now", many see EV charging as taking too darn long. 300 miles of range takes far longer for EV than liquid fuel. And 30 miles of range takes far longer for EV than liquid fuel. The ratio may not be totally linear, but it's certainly close. In fact, it probably favors the liquid fuels because 30 miles in my Taurus would take about 1 gallon; that ain't long at the pump!
I have a friend whom has a Volt; he loves it. Charges it at home, drives to work and gets to charge it at work (for free, at least to him). But as you know, it's not a pure electric only vehicle. He would never have a pure EV by his own admission.
EVs make sense in some situations; I'll admit that. A small EV that is ONLY used in urban situations, and has the ability to recharge at consistent, convenient places and times might be a good choice for some folks. But they are NOT a one-size-fits-all solution for all drivers. Too many of us have a w-i-d-e variety of driving situations that defy the nature of EV use.
I have a 2018 F-250 6.2L truck. I can use it in winter for 4x4 driving to/from any destination, and it is a must-have because I live in a VERY hilly area that precluds FWD or RWD in winter. But I can also use that truck to pull my RV trailer to AZ and CO and such; long drives of 8+ hours, with only a few minutes fill up of it's 34 gallon tank. And I can haul my Kubota to various places with ease, because the torque produced is 100% from the first gallon to the last gallon; the power does not degrade as the miles pile on. Try that with an EV ...
We have a 2018 Taurus for commuting; generally 28mpg if easy on the throttle. But we can also drive it from IN to AZ and back for the holidays, and it only takes a few minutes to gas up, and we're back on the interstate. Try that with an EV ...
This is about energy density packaging; it speaks to range as well as force production relative to duration of exposure. Right now, EVs are great at light-duty tasks that do not call for long distance challenges. But they suck at being a "jack of all trades" vehicle. They are a precise, near-surgical instrument that makes sense in a very limited scope. And the challenges they have are not easily overcome; not today, nor the near future. Someday? Maybe so. They will become mainstream when they can solve ALL problems of the mainstream use factors. Until then, they are a sideshow effort I am not interested in.
You make good points that I have made on many posts.
Another point: I charge at home when the car is in the garage. I never go to a gas station and start with a full tank every day.
Until you have experienced this, I believe you cannot understand what a great perk it is.
I charged at a Supercharger once, just to give it a shot.
If you disregard that 5 minute test (we went into Starbucks), your Taurus spends infinitely more of your time fueling then my Model 3.
Of course this speaks to one end of the spectrum. I have seen Teslas waiting in line to charge in downtown Los Gatos; I was shocked!
Again, EVs are not for everyone. I still consider my Tesla a toy. No one needs a Tesla, or a Vette, Poreche, MB, Beemer, etc. A Honda Civic is probably a better car than any of those.
Many cars are purpose built, not just EVs.
I am not sure I ever called the Model 3 a jack of all trades; in fact I have said our RX (or any suv) fits that bill pretty well.
If I could have only 1 car, it would not be an EV. In fact every owner I have spoke to has more than 1 car.
As for the partial charge, this speaks to EV fueling strategy. It is different than ICE cars; another point I have stated. You learn.
Is this as good as ICE cars for more than say, 200 miles? Of course not.
You are right, apples to apples the ICE car makes much more sense in so many ways.
EVs are not ICE; that's the point. "Apples to apples" misses the point.
You may not be interested in EVs; they don't make sense for you and your situation. I get it.
Totally understand and agree.
By the way, I pass lotsa Ford F-250 trucks (and other vehicles) in the commuter lane as they trudge along in traffic...
FYI, I love pickups; I will always have one. They are my personal favorite.
I am not sure EVs are a sideshow, at least for 100K new car sales per quarter. And growing in an otherwise generally declining car market.
I think you know the Model 3 has the highest customer satisfaction of any car, at least according to CR.
Owners flat out love their Model 3s. I know I do. These cars are exciting.
Again, you make good points; well said. EVs are in their infancy as mass production vehicles.