YEah we had a good dialog on the MG and you did say that. I think there is something to that as well and since no dual stage design uses it, the case becomes even stronger.
My mail here although dialoging with you is as targeted more at guys making absolute claims and a few others.
I always enjoy my discussion with you.
We also see eye to eye on the wear vs cleanliness, but many on BITOG say filter efficiency simply does now matter and cite a car with "X" high miles on it. Thing about that is we have no way of knowing how well it runs or how tight it is because those poster dont show us 15 years of smog data or leak downs to really define anything.
Agreed Wix has been less than forthright with many and thats a bummer as I used to like and respect them more- I still think they make a decent quality filter, but there are better for the money.
Also agreed its a good if not gold standard reference for a single stage, and if you can compare apple s to apple all other things being equal its a good indicator of the filters efficiency.
Do I always believe what a manufacturer prints on a box ? Im a skeptic at heart and have watched many of these numbers change over time.
We agree on much more than we disagree on.
UD
My mail here although dialoging with you is as targeted more at guys making absolute claims and a few others.
I always enjoy my discussion with you.
We also see eye to eye on the wear vs cleanliness, but many on BITOG say filter efficiency simply does now matter and cite a car with "X" high miles on it. Thing about that is we have no way of knowing how well it runs or how tight it is because those poster dont show us 15 years of smog data or leak downs to really define anything.
Agreed Wix has been less than forthright with many and thats a bummer as I used to like and respect them more- I still think they make a decent quality filter, but there are better for the money.
Also agreed its a good if not gold standard reference for a single stage, and if you can compare apple s to apple all other things being equal its a good indicator of the filters efficiency.
Do I always believe what a manufacturer prints on a box ? Im a skeptic at heart and have watched many of these numbers change over time.
We agree on much more than we disagree on.
UD
Last edited: