Recent Topics
Brilliant payback for package thieves
by SirTanon. 12/18/18 01:22 PM
Calling all Ford Owners
by dogememe. 12/18/18 01:01 PM
2003 Ford CVPI, 86kmi, 6kmi on Edge HM Ti 5W30
by Colt45ws. 12/18/18 12:35 PM
2017 Kia Sportage recall notice
by SlavaB. 12/18/18 12:26 PM
My VW Service Experience
by Delta. 12/18/18 11:36 AM
Nissan high idle, P0507
by LeakySeals. 12/18/18 11:23 AM
Should i go for even thinner fluid ?
by NICAT. 12/18/18 11:06 AM
Viscosity question
by dbierman. 12/18/18 10:50 AM
48 hours and a used car
by Imp4. 12/18/18 09:32 AM
Test driving PHEV w no battery charge
by RichardS. 12/18/18 09:02 AM
2005 Ford PSD with hard shifts when cold?
by racin4ds. 12/18/18 08:08 AM
18% off Ravenol + EVERYTHING @ Blauparts.com
by CleverUserName. 12/18/18 07:48 AM
Mattress shopping .....
by dblshock. 12/18/18 04:57 AM
AmazonBasics Oil May Drive Prices Down
by knerml. 12/18/18 04:45 AM
Hemi MDS issues are how common?
by Gasbuggy. 12/18/18 03:21 AM
Why use Redline and Redline Clone oils...
by burla. 12/17/18 11:38 PM
Tire choice
by CincyReds. 12/17/18 11:14 PM
Newest Members
MuhThugga, wxo, dbierman, keyblade, leeal
66716 Registered Users
Who's Online Now
94 registered members (1WildPig, 28oz, 5azzmonkey, 2K2AcuraTL, andyd, 12 invisible), 2,182 guests, and 41 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums67
Topics295,224
Posts4,930,452
Members66,716
Most Online2,553
Oct 27th, 2018
Donate to BITOG
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Hop To
Page 1 of 2 1 2
Volvo XC90 dilemma. #4648624
01/28/18 05:34 AM
01/28/18 05:34 AM
Joined: Jan 2016
Posts: 849
NC
Vladiator Offline OP
Vladiator  Offline OP
Joined: Jan 2016
Posts: 849
NC
I am currently looking at family SUVs under $8k. Safety, efficiency, and reliability is what I am looking for. XC90 came on my radar, a couple of them, and I need help choosing.

Option #1:
2006 Volvo XC90 V8 AWD. Has 156k miles on it. Below $6k. 3rd row and most bells and whistles are there. Seems like a heck of a deal for a reliable SUV with V8 from Yamaha and robust transmission from Aisin.

But... there is option 2:
2006 Volvo XC90 AWD 2.5T. Same vehicle, similar price, different drivetrain/powertrain, and has 98k miles. This 5 cylinder has been around since 1990s and is proven to last. If I get it - PCV system and timing belt are getting changed right away.

I am now torn between these two. I want the power of a V8, but the 5-banger has less miles and is just as reliable, AFAIK. Help me choose if you had close experience with either or both. What other issues are common with these cars? Thank you in advance.

Re: Volvo XC90 dilemma. [Re: Vladiator] #4648636
01/28/18 06:06 AM
01/28/18 06:06 AM
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 1,257
Lyndhurst NJ
Audios Online content
Audios  Online Content
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 1,257
Lyndhurst NJ
Oil trap is common on the turbo cars, and some of the earlier ones had issues with the cam gear failing and dumping oil all over the timing belt. That was more common on the s40s though. Weve been doing the front struts on the v8 more often than the turbos as well, Im assuming because of the extra weight. Id probably go with the lower miles, at 156k you could be due for alot of bigger stuff, struts like I mentioned, possible trans issues developing etc. Lower miles, lower fuel economy, lower maintenace most likely, lower price.


2002 VW Golf TDI-Mobil 1 5/40 TDT
2007 Mercedes GL320 CDI Fuchs 5/40 GT Pro XTL
2005 BMW M3 BMW Twin Power 10/60
2003 BMW M5-Fuchs 5/40
1998 BMW M3/4/5 Fuchs 5/40
Re: Volvo XC90 dilemma. [Re: Vladiator] #4648641
01/28/18 06:10 AM
01/28/18 06:10 AM
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 5,122
North Carolina
rooflessVW Offline
rooflessVW  Offline
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 5,122
North Carolina
My heart says the V8.

My head says get the 5 banger. Lower miles and it'll give you less trouble.


"Zed's dead baby, Zed's dead."
Re: Volvo XC90 dilemma. [Re: Vladiator] #4648654
01/28/18 06:24 AM
01/28/18 06:24 AM
Joined: Jul 2015
Posts: 4,039
New England
madRiver Offline
madRiver  Offline
Joined: Jul 2015
Posts: 4,039
New England
If you are wrenching the one you prefer.

If you are paying anyone to repair they are average reliability with expensive bits and parts.

Re: Volvo XC90 dilemma. [Re: madRiver] #4648678
01/28/18 07:08 AM
01/28/18 07:08 AM
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 5,951
Champlain/Hudson Valley
Kira Offline
Kira  Offline
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 5,951
Champlain/Hudson Valley
5 wins on underhood access
5 wins with lower miles
5 wins with better handling (nimbler)
8 wins w/o turbo
8 wins w regular gas
8 wins w lower highway revs

Apparent maintenance just got larger
You have years to go with the 5's exhaust. What about the 8's?
Can you bring a reader and check for pending codes?
Can you test drive them?

Where are these cars? I assume they're private sale vehicles.

Good luck with your decision.

Re: Volvo XC90 dilemma. [Re: Vladiator] #4648682
01/28/18 07:16 AM
01/28/18 07:16 AM
Joined: Nov 2014
Posts: 547
Denver
marine65 Offline
marine65  Offline
Joined: Nov 2014
Posts: 547
Denver
i truly believe if you are going to buy a high mileage vehicle its best to stick with Honda or Toyota.
Volvo no way.
And before the comments start both my vehicles were bought with reasonable mileage.

Last edited by marine65; 01/28/18 07:26 AM.

2006 Nissan Sentra 199K miles. How far will it go ?
2010 Hyundai Elantra 86K miles
Re: Volvo XC90 dilemma. [Re: Vladiator] #4648693
01/28/18 07:38 AM
01/28/18 07:38 AM
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 1,257
Lyndhurst NJ
Audios Online content
Audios  Online Content
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 1,257
Lyndhurst NJ
We had a t5 volvo S60 in the other day with 315k on it, these definitely hold up, the major issue is that some repairs will out value the cars, which sends them right to the junkyard.


2002 VW Golf TDI-Mobil 1 5/40 TDT
2007 Mercedes GL320 CDI Fuchs 5/40 GT Pro XTL
2005 BMW M3 BMW Twin Power 10/60
2003 BMW M5-Fuchs 5/40
1998 BMW M3/4/5 Fuchs 5/40
Re: Volvo XC90 dilemma. [Re: marine65] #4648697
01/28/18 07:46 AM
01/28/18 07:46 AM
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 339
North Carolina
Egg_Head Offline
Egg_Head  Offline
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 339
North Carolina
I owned an XC-90 T6, different tranny and motor combo altogether. Very solid driving vehicle and great family hauler for us. I would go with the T5 b/c of the ability to up the turbo boost if you choose. You will need to become good friends with IPD USA. https://www.ipdusa.com/ They have lots of parts and upgrades for this vehicle. Their sway bar upgrades are legendary for Volvos and worth every penny. Regardless I'd have an independent Volvo mechanic look at which ever one you decide before purchase.


1979 Garelli Rally Sport
2009 Cub Cadet LT1042
2002 BMW 540 M Sport (totaled)
2011 MB E350 4Matic wagon
1979 CJ-7
Re: Volvo XC90 dilemma. [Re: Vladiator] #4648816
01/28/18 09:32 AM
01/28/18 09:32 AM
Joined: Aug 2017
Posts: 673
MN
14Accent Offline
14Accent  Offline
Joined: Aug 2017
Posts: 673
MN
Research the IMS shaft bearing failure in the V8. I forget when they got fixed or updated.

The V8 is a pain to work on. It just is. The T5 is much easier, but a little gutless. I would still prefer the V8 with it's quirks. They are butter smooth.


2013 Chevrolet Volt - Saves enough in fuel to pay for itself!

2003 Cadillac Seville STS - The winter "beater", it uses the Volt's fuel
Re: Volvo XC90 dilemma. [Re: Vladiator] #4648973
01/28/18 11:48 AM
01/28/18 11:48 AM
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 5,091
USA
NHGUY Offline
NHGUY  Offline
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 5,091
USA
Go online at a genuine Volvo website and price some of the parts for these cars.You will be penniless shortly when they start acting up.You might as well restore an old car for the same money and have some value leftover,as opposed to giving away a money trap Volvo when you throw your hands up.

Re: Volvo XC90 dilemma. [Re: Vladiator] #4648975
01/28/18 11:49 AM
01/28/18 11:49 AM
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 2,606
Canada
Lolvoguy Offline
Lolvoguy  Offline
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 2,606
Canada
Considering Volvo does not build a NA engine anymore, I'd choose the V8.

I think the V8 equipped S80 and XC90 may actually increase and become collectible as they years go by.
They were reliable (Yamaha built) and were super stealthy.


06 Lexus IS350- Wife
88 BMW 325is- Mistress
Say "no" to Turbo!
Re: Volvo XC90 dilemma. [Re: Vladiator] #4648976
01/28/18 11:50 AM
01/28/18 11:50 AM
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 156
SoCal
shokhead Offline
shokhead  Offline
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 156
SoCal
98k is much better then 156k as long as you KNOW the maintenance history. I'd never buy a car with that many miles without records to show reg maintenance.


2014 Audi SQ5 ice silver metallic premium plus with black nappa leather and 21's
Re: Volvo XC90 dilemma. [Re: Vladiator] #4650745
01/30/18 04:31 AM
01/30/18 04:31 AM
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 9,133
Virginia Beach
Astro14 Offline
Astro14  Offline
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 9,133
Virginia Beach
I would chose the lower miles. Miles take a toll on the suspension and the PCV System - both of which are weak points.

The I5 turbo is a durable, reliable motor. Just keep up with timing belt changes (every 120,000 for that year, and PCV maintenance. You’ll probably need to do the PCV system anyway. Not hard.

I don’t have any personal experience with the V8. Looks nice on paper.

What’s the condition between the two? If one is beat up, choose the cleaner. If they’re the same in condition, lower miles.


32 Packard 15W40
02 Volvo V70 T5 0W40 M1
02 Volvo V70 XC 0W40 Edge
05 MB S600 0W40 M1
16 Tundra 1794 5W30 Pennzoil Ultra
Re: Volvo XC90 dilemma. [Re: Astro14] #4651687
01/31/18 02:46 AM
01/31/18 02:46 AM
Joined: Jan 2016
Posts: 849
NC
Vladiator Offline OP
Vladiator  Offline OP
Joined: Jan 2016
Posts: 849
NC
Originally Posted By: Astro14
I would chose the lower miles. Miles take a toll on the suspension and the PCV System - both of which are weak points.

The I5 turbo is a durable, reliable motor. Just keep up with timing belt changes (every 120,000 for that year, and PCV maintenance. You’ll probably need to do the PCV system anyway. Not hard.

I don’t have any personal experience with the V8. Looks nice on paper.

What’s the condition between the two? If one is beat up, choose the cleaner. If they’re the same in condition, lower miles.

I choose the nicest examples in my price point, they both are very clean. Leaning towards the I5 now... There are many cheaper ones - either super beat up with low miles, or look nice, but have 200k-300k miles.

Re: Volvo XC90 dilemma. [Re: Vladiator] #4653524
02/01/18 09:21 PM
02/01/18 09:21 PM
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 281
Chadds Ford
Toros Offline
Toros  Offline
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 281
Chadds Ford
My son has my old 06 XC90 2.5t. Likely the best vehicle I've ever owned. Had it 4 years and no major repairs...wheel bearing was as bad as it got. The timing belt thing is critical.Roomy, safe, reliable and great to drive. 170,000 everything works on it. The Volvo turbo 2.5 is solid. Stay with full synthetic. ..Supertech 5-30 and Toyota Type IV trans fluid when you drain and fill every 80,000 or so. Great sound system but Volvo proprietary and you'll need an aftermarket bluetooth device. AC and climate control is excellent. Seats are super comfortable and no one is cramped. Tons of room and you won't find a safer vehicle.
The 2.5t can move plenty quick Volvo got the turbo thing right and that engine is a perfect fit for the XC 90 platform. It gets out of its own way just fine. The trans is an Aisan -Warner and rock solid. Ours shifts like a Swiss watch. You font need th the 8cyl.

Last edited by Toros; 02/01/18 09:28 PM.
Page 1 of 2 1 2

BOB IS THE OIL GUY® Powered by UBB.threads™