Originally Posted by PowerSurge
You're ok with the insults, as tired as they are you did make them mildly risible.
Back it up a bit. My first reply to you was simply laughing at your 3rd party anecdote, since I happen to know every mechanic at my local dealer and my experience doesn't align with your "opinion from my singular buddy" and remarking as much. You then proceeded to accuse ME of trolling, immediately below my comment where I gave first-hand experience with THREE of the vehicles the OP is looking for feedback on. So who was the one that started the insults? Got a mirror handy?
Originally Posted by PowerSurge
But when someone like you immediately resorts to insults, you have told everyone that you had your feelings hurt and are angry.
See my point above. So, I made it a point to question the value of your useless opinion, you call me a troll, but I'm the one who immediately resorted to insults? Again, perhaps you need to scroll back through the thread to get a proper handle on whose contribution was inflammatory and devoid of value.
Originally Posted by PowerSurge
The internet is a great place for cyberbullys because they can say things that they would never say to someone's face because there would be an immediate negative reaction whereby the bully would be dealt more than one knuckle sandwich.
Ahhh yes, the looming threat of physical violence by the guy who claims he's not the bully. Icing on the cake here.
Originally Posted by PowerSurge
I tell you what, show me hard data where the Grand Cherokee is more reliable and trouble-free than all the other vehicles in its class.
Never said it was, I simply balked at your assertion that it was unable to make the mileage claimed because of some useless quip from "a friend". Brand bashing isn't useful and contrary to your assertion, makes you the troll.
Originally Posted by PowerSurge
Your anecdotal experiences could be total fabrications and are therefore meaningless.
I've posted detailed threads, complete with pictures, on every one of the vehicles I've owned. If you want to believe I've gone to the trouble of making that up, you go right ahead, but since you aren't the one looking for experience with the vehicle in question, it's up to the OP to value the merit of my contributions here.
Originally Posted by PowerSurge
Notice how I stated "could be". Not to mention your brand loyalty is also a red flag to any thinking person.
It's not brand loyalty, I've already mentioned that I've no favouritism for any brand, what I have a problem with is some guy BASHING a brand, then accusing another of being a "fanboi" because their opinion, and experience, doesn't fit into the mold that they've built with their bashing.
Originally Posted by PowerSurge
The point of people on this forum and others asking for guidance on making the second largest purchase they will probably ever make is to attempt to diminish the chance they will buy a lemon.
Right, they are looking at feedback on people who have OWNED the vehicle in question, not 3rd party anecdotes. Coming in and bashing the brand because you've managed to develop an unfavourable opinion of it, while providing nothing of value isn't helping the OP and instead, results in the ruination of threads like this one. You've not replied to any of the other posts addressing your first post in this thread, I assume because you are too hot-to-trot in engaging me at this juncture, but please, scroll back through and respond to the others that have taken exception to your comments.
Originally Posted by PowerSurge
FCA produces some attractive vehicles and some of them are fun to drive, no doubt. But NO ONE can honestly say that Chrysler makes higher quality vehicles across their vehicle lines than Toyota or even Chevrolet.
Cool, so the HF 3.6L V6 has historically been a good spot for GM then? What about truck transmissions, how many threads do we have on here with the 4L60E breaking? I've no personal experience with Toyota, so I can't comment on their reliability, but I've got plenty of seat time in various GM products and their quality is just as hit-and-miss as you accuse FCA of being. That does NOT mean that every GM product is garbage! I'm not willing to slam an entire brand just because they've produced some less-than-great products.
Originally Posted by PowerSurge
The data doesn't show it. If you think otherwise and say otherwise, you're lying to everyone but yourself.
I've provided my first-hand experience with the vehicle in question, I'm not lying to anyone; wait, weren't you the one claiming I accused YOU of lying in a previous thread? Now you are saying my personal experience is irrelevant and your opinion has more merit and if I believe my experience, I'm lying to myself? Boy, the contortions we put our minds through to maintain the narrative eh?
Originally Posted by PowerSurge
Don't be so sensitive or defensive of a brand to not be open to admitting there are better choices.
The OP wasn't asking for opinions on what random people with no experience with the vehicle in question feels are "better choices". He asked for feedback on the Grand Cherokee, and there are a few of us, that have actually owned the product, that have provided our input. I made light of your vapid quip and you took exception to me pointing out its inherent lack of value, so it would seem the individual with the sensitivity problem is yourself.
Originally Posted by PowerSurge
"Brand loyalty" is the source of that sensitivity and defensiveness.
Then what did FCA do to offend you so that you feel compelled to pop into threads like these and pander useless opinion?
Originally Posted by PowerSurge
Keeping an open mind is preferable to the alternative.
You'd be wise to take your own advise on that then, if you truly believe it.
Originally Posted by PowerSurge
Before all of my major purchases I do my own research, take emotion out of the equation and rely on data and people that I know and trust. Brand loyalty doesn't enter into the equation.
So you don't specifically go on message boards like this one and ask for advice hoping that people that have NOT owned the product respond, so that you can take their advice instead? Weird.
Originally Posted by PowerSurge
To rely on one's esoteric ‘knowledge' or brand loyalty (could also be called emotion), could be a costly mistake.
And to rely on the opinion of some guy with zero experience and instead simply feels inclined to brand bash could be even more costly
Originally Posted by PowerSurge
If you want to continue with the insults and being just another cyberspace tough guy my suggestion would be to find something more productive to do with your time. Life is too short to be so uptight.
The only one being a "tough guy" here is you. Telling people to grow up because they pointed out that your contribution here was devoid of value and then indicating that doing so in "real life" would result in a punch in the face. Classy. Here's a novel idea: Take your own advice and instead of providing useless heresy and flagrant opinion, derailing people's threads, you seek to provide valuable data and experience with products you've actually owned and have experience with, assuming that capability is within your wheelhouse