Results: preventive IVC with each oil change since new

Joined
Mar 12, 2014
Messages
791
Location
Bay Village, Ohio
I bought a Subaru Forester new in 2022, and I wanted to see if running IVC at regular intervals from the beginning would prevent or slow carbon build up. I couldn't see anywhere on YouTube or anything like that where it had been done in that capacity. It doesn't look like IVC does much once the carbon is already baked on after 50k or 70k miles, but does it help prevent it before that point?

The Forester has just under 20k miles. It's had 5 oil changes, between 4-5k mile intervals. I did the first one early, no IVC run through at that one, so I've used it 4 times.

My driving habits...21 mile mostly interstate commute, so the oil gets up to temp for 12-15 minutes each way depending on season. Some stop and go driving outside of that, of course.

I used STP Pro IVC for this. I chose this largely for it's simplicity of use as it can be done by one person, but it's definitely the expensive choice.

I'm sorry the pictures aren't great but here are the results. The stems look good, but there is some minor coking on the backs of the valves (I would say my poor pic quality makes it look a little worse than seeing it in person).

The mechanic doing this was interested to see the results as well as they also do the walnut shell treatments. The conclusion is that it probably has helped *some*, but I was hoping it would look a little better. I think it's about what I expected, though.

Of course, I don't have a baseline for comparison...another 20k mile 2.5L NA Subaru boxer engine with similar driving habits. Maybe it worked better than it appears? Maybe not. I couldn't find anything. I can't even find enough info to know if Subaru engines are known to carbon up quickly, or are they slower to do so...

Will I keep doing this? Not sure yet.

Any feedback is welcomed.

0626230929.jpg
0626230929a.jpg
 
Thanks for sharing. That's more that what I would have expected at that mileage. Unfortunately, there isn't much you can do. What oil are you using? I'd be tempted to lean towards an oil that has very high solvency, oxidation resistance and low Noack.
 
Thanks for sharing. That's more that what I would have expected at that mileage. Unfortunately, there isn't much you can do. What oil are you using? I'd be tempted to lean towards an oil that has very high solvency, oxidation resistance and low Noack.
Valvoline EP. I'm probably just going to opt for the walnut shells at 60k miles or something like that. The more I think about it, the more I'm a little disappointed, but again, I didn't have unreasonable expectations.
 
Valvoline EP. I'm probably just going to opt for the walnut shells at 60k miles or something like that. The more I think about it, the more I'm a little disappointed, but again, I didn't have unreasonable expectations.
Decent oil. I would just go with the walnut shell blasting too.
 
Not guarnateed to work but you could give HPL oils a shot.


"Oils formulated with specifically chosen esters can help to minimize intake valve deposits, maintain clean engines and provide elastomer compatibility."
 
STP Pro IVC only lists solvents and oxygenates, Later in the MSDS there is reference to triethanolamine, but without concentration mentioned I have to assume it is low and insignificant. Seems like a rather lackluster product, as most stuff from STP is.

Look into comparable products from CRC or Berryman. Both contain PEA. CRC even mentions this on the label.
Berryman 6-10%, CRC 10-20%
 
Back
Top