Originally Posted By: 4WD
You are the most anti M1 on site - king of the hill guy on this site with 90% great posts -sos on this topic.
Who else used Db meter - lets "hear" from them.
Well sort of ... I'm not really anti M1. If it works well in some motors, I'm all for continued use. I have never said it was bad oil. I know folks who track their cars with M1 and have good UOA's. Plenty of new engines out there that run very well on M1 w/o a hint of noise. Not so many older high mileage ones tough ...
I am vehemently anti noise. Engines that rattle or knock on cold start are a giant no-no in my world. I want quiet cold starts because that means I have sufficient retained film to do the job until pumped and sling oil get going in enough quantity to take over.
I don't need a dB meter. My ears tell me if an oil is doing its job on cold start. If I can't hear anything nasty, that's good enough
And cold start is the place where I start listening. Hood up a day or a week after an oil change. Light it and listen. I have vehicles that sit for a week or two between outings. If an oil is going to drain-off, it'll do it then. If quite after sitting for a week, I'll have a smile on my face and a happy motor.
The 302 in my Bronco is 220K and it'll tell you in a heart beat if it does not like the oil on cold start. I tried M1 out of my own pocket because I'm always looking for long life in engines. It's a lot of work to pull one and go through it. That 302 hated M1 after just 24 hours. Minor rod knock sounds and other rattles. The Saab was/is the same way.
The Bronco on Delo 400 - quiet as can be after a week. The Saab on T6 much less noisy (140K on the clock). In the case of the Saab, it must have syn to counter coking due to design issues. So the search was on including M1. Sometimes it works for me, sometimes not ...