Speaking of which...
Dear Mr. Jeep-Defending-Our-Country-From-Mobil-1:
I see you haven't yet responded directly to my points. I understand if they got lost in the shuffle. Here they are again:
Originally Posted By: d00df00d
The same guy posted the same pictures and said the same things here. It was thoroughly discussed. It looks impressive, but it says nothing. Here's a quick summary of why:
- There were no "before" measurements; only "after" measurements.
- The correct procedure is to perform each measurement several times and then analyze the numbers for statistical significance. None of this was done.
- The appearance of the cam lobes says nothing because a cam lobe that looks shiny and smooth can actually be MORE worn than one that looks rough and scuffed.
Click here.
Moreover,
even if the Royal Purple did perform better, that could be explained by the fact that that particular grade has more ZDDP than the particular grade of Mobil 1 that was used. This is because Mobil 1 5w-20 is made to meet API SM, whereas Royal Purple 5w-20 is not. In other words, it wouldn't be about which oil is "better;" it would simply reflect the fact that those two particular oils were designed for different purposes -- again,
if the Royal Purple actually did do better, of which there is insufficient evidence.
This is a perfect example of how, regardless of what one might think from the abundance of testimonials, actual good evidence is difficult to find.
Since that post, you have taken us from the Mustang cam example to gear oil tests, copy-pasted articles from Royal Purple websites, pictures of drums of Royal Purple next to heavy machinery, and insinuations as to the motives of others. Every time one of your examples is critically undermined, you change to another one. I hope you understand that this is not a productive way to convince anyone. Let's take one thing at a time.
Looking forward to hearing from you.