Recent Topics
Dodge 318 oil?
by chartrue2
08/30/16 05:04 PM
Fram Ultra XG3506 - 2 years/11,000 miles Cut Open
by Nick1994
08/30/16 04:39 PM
Genesis G70 spy photos
by HTSS_TR
08/30/16 04:17 PM
SAE 16. Set at a minimum of 2.3 mPa⋅s at 150C
by wemay
08/30/16 03:33 PM
1992 Surburban Big Block - M1 10W-30 - 5 year OCI
by bigt61
08/30/16 03:32 PM
2007 Civic Wiper Blade Contact Fix
by 4thstpositively
08/30/16 03:14 PM
Got me a new Stihl FS 56 trimmer today
by daddi
08/30/16 01:02 PM
Truck cap lights.
by wolfehunter
08/30/16 12:12 PM
filters and oem specs
by mobilaltima
08/30/16 11:50 AM
H11 bulb options
by asiancivicmaniac
08/30/16 11:47 AM
Engine oil accidently added into transmission
by Mazatrol
08/30/16 09:51 AM
Oil for 1996 Mazda B4000 pickup
by schuylkill
08/30/16 09:16 AM
Newest Members
pperras01, Grabberblu, Dave_PPE, davebe, Logos
58964 Registered Users
Who's Online
75 registered (4WD, ammolab, AlaskaMike, 69GTX, 86cutlass307, Alfred_B, 4 invisible), 1661 Guests and 5 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Stats
58964 Members
66 Forums
253778 Topics
4166660 Posts

Max Online: 2862 @ 07/07/14 03:10 PM
Donate to BITOG
Page 4 of 5 < 1 2 3 4 5 >
Topic Options
#3426601 - 07/16/14 02:49 PM Re: K&N Cool Air intake, '13 2.0L Dart [Re: badtlc]
grampi Offline


Registered: 10/08/06
Posts: 6087
Loc: OH
Originally Posted By: badtlc
Originally Posted By: grampi
Originally Posted By: badtlc
Originally Posted By: grampi


Like I said, prove that K&Ns contribute to premature engine wear, otherwise, go away...if they are as bad as you claim then it should be an easy task...


You obviously don't read very well.


Neither do you...


Such as?


I said prove that K&N filters cause premature engine wear or go away...you have done neither...

Top
#3426612 - 07/16/14 02:58 PM Re: K&N Cool Air intake, '13 2.0L Dart [Re: grampi]
badtlc Offline


Registered: 06/08/06
Posts: 4996
Loc: KC
Originally Posted By: grampi

I said prove that K&N filters cause premature engine wear or go away...you have done neither...


Why would I do that when I clearly said there has been nothing to show K&N filters lead to shorter engine life? Again, you clearly cannot read very well.
_________________________
2007 Ford Escape XLS 2.3L ATX, Trop Artic 5W30, Fram OCOD, 140k+
2015 Chrysler T&C, 45k+

Top
#3426616 - 07/16/14 03:02 PM Re: K&N Cool Air intake, '13 2.0L Dart [Re: badtlc]
grampi Offline


Registered: 10/08/06
Posts: 6087
Loc: OH
Originally Posted By: badtlc
Originally Posted By: grampi

I said prove that K&N filters cause premature engine wear or go away...you have done neither...


Why would I do that when I clearly said there has been nothing to show K&N filters lead to shorter engine life? Again, you clearly cannot read very well.


Then why are you saying they're lousy filters? If they actually were lousy, then showing evidence of excessive engine wear would be easy...

Top
#3426899 - 07/16/14 08:17 PM Re: K&N Cool Air intake, '13 2.0L Dart [Re: grampi]
badtlc Offline


Registered: 06/08/06
Posts: 4996
Loc: KC
Originally Posted By: grampi
Originally Posted By: badtlc
Originally Posted By: grampi

I said prove that K&N filters cause premature engine wear or go away...you have done neither...


Why would I do that when I clearly said there has been nothing to show K&N filters lead to shorter engine life? Again, you clearly cannot read very well.


Then why are you saying they're lousy filters? If they actually were lousy, then showing evidence of excessive engine wear would be easy...


Because there isn't a worse filter out there when it comes to...you know...filtering air entering the engine. Being the worst makes it terrible. Not sure why this is so confusing for you.
_________________________
2007 Ford Escape XLS 2.3L ATX, Trop Artic 5W30, Fram OCOD, 140k+
2015 Chrysler T&C, 45k+

Top
#3426938 - 07/16/14 08:50 PM Re: K&N Cool Air intake, '13 2.0L Dart [Re: badtlc]
Nick1994 Offline


Registered: 02/19/13
Posts: 6259
Loc: Phoenix, AZ
Originally Posted By: badtlc
Originally Posted By: grampi
Originally Posted By: badtlc
Originally Posted By: grampi

I said prove that K&N filters cause premature engine wear or go away...you have done neither...


Why would I do that when I clearly said there has been nothing to show K&N filters lead to shorter engine life? Again, you clearly cannot read very well.


Then why are you saying they're lousy filters? If they actually were lousy, then showing evidence of excessive engine wear would be easy...


Because there isn't a worse filter out there when it comes to...you know...filtering air entering the engine. Being the worst makes it terrible. Not sure why this is so confusing for you.

Here's someone's study on K&N and other filters

http://www.thedieselpageforums.com/tdpforum/showthread.php?t=11674
_________________________
2000 Toyota Camry 2.2L 216k
Mobil 1 EP 10w30 & Fram Ultra

Top
#3427206 - 07/17/14 07:37 AM Re: K&N Cool Air intake, '13 2.0L Dart [Re: badtlc]
Hokiefyd Offline


Registered: 06/24/04
Posts: 13904
Loc: Top of Virginia
Originally Posted By: badtlc
Because there isn't a worse filter out there when it comes to...you know...filtering air entering the engine. Being the worst makes it terrible. Not sure why this is so confusing for you.


I think grampi's point is, if engine life isn't effectively worsened, then how much does it really matter? Say Person A uses the best filter out there and gets 300k miles out of his engine. And say Person B uses the worst filter out there and gets 300k miles out of his engine. In the end, what's the difference?

You want the best filter, right, to keep the most dirt out of the engine, right, so the engine will last longer, right? The very last factor is key..."so the engine will last longer". We use air filters to keep dirt out of the engine....and the ONLY reason is to extend the life of the engine. There's no national contest out there for those whose cylinder walls have the fewest scratches. Sure, you can measure dirt that a filter passes, and it might make you feel better to know that Filter A traps more than Filter B, but it's an argument of conjecture until someone can demonstrate that engine life is affected.

I suppose one can draw a parallel with engine oil here. An oil's main purpose in life is to lubricate the engine right? So why not buy the oil that does that the absolute best. You're using conventional Valvoline. A lot of other oils out there pass much higher performance standards. Why do you use Valvoline? Because it's sufficient, right? It's sufficient for the task.

And there's a direct parallel with oil filters. Some people believe that the only filter that belongs on a car is one with 99.9% efficiency at so many microns. And they're free to use those. Meanwhile, Honda and Toyota are using oil filters that are 60% efficient and, yet, their engines last just as long, if not longer, than anyone else's. The 60% efficient oil filters are sufficient for the task.

It could just be that K&N filters are sufficient for the task. Until there's a lot of evidence to the contrary, I'm afraid all discussion is only conjecture.
_________________________
Cheers,
Jason

2009 Honda Ridgeline RTL
2005 Acura MDX Touring

Top
#3427249 - 07/17/14 08:23 AM Re: K&N Cool Air intake, '13 2.0L Dart [Re: Hokiefyd]
badtlc Offline


Registered: 06/08/06
Posts: 4996
Loc: KC
Originally Posted By: Hokiefyd
Originally Posted By: badtlc
Because there isn't a worse filter out there when it comes to...you know...filtering air entering the engine. Being the worst makes it terrible. Not sure why this is so confusing for you.


It could just be that K&N filters are sufficient for the task. Until there's a lot of evidence to the contrary, I'm afraid all discussion is only conjecture.


You apparently missed the two previous posts of mine where I made that quite clear. There is little hard evidence showing K&N reduces engine life by a significant amount.

On the other hand, it is logical to assume dirt in your eninge isn't a good thing for engine life.
_________________________
2007 Ford Escape XLS 2.3L ATX, Trop Artic 5W30, Fram OCOD, 140k+
2015 Chrysler T&C, 45k+

Top
#3427311 - 07/17/14 09:28 AM Re: K&N Cool Air intake, '13 2.0L Dart [Re: GumbyJarvis]
badtlc Offline


Registered: 06/08/06
Posts: 4996
Loc: KC
It sounds like SAE does have some studies showing poor filtration increases engine wear.

http://www.bobistheoilguy.com/forums/ubbthreads.php?ubb=showflat&Number=490768
_________________________
2007 Ford Escape XLS 2.3L ATX, Trop Artic 5W30, Fram OCOD, 140k+
2015 Chrysler T&C, 45k+

Top
#3427333 - 07/17/14 09:58 AM Re: K&N Cool Air intake, '13 2.0L Dart [Re: badtlc]
Hokiefyd Offline


Registered: 06/24/04
Posts: 13904
Loc: Top of Virginia
Originally Posted By: badtlc
You apparently missed the two previous posts of mine where I made that quite clear. There is little hard evidence showing K&N reduces engine life by a significant amount.


I didn't miss them. I think there's simply a difference in perspective among us. A filter that doesn't filter as well as another makes it a poorer filter. It doesn't necessarily make it a poor choice for use on a vehicle.

I'll bet there are tires out there that perform better than the ones on your car. That doesn't make your tires terrible. There are probably shoes that are more comfortable than the ones you're wearing. That doesn't make your shoes terrible. There's lunch that's likely more tasty than the one you'll have today. That doesn't make your lunch terrible. There are tradeoffs in everything. A theoretical loss in filtration of a performance filter might not affect the OP's engine life at all, and he gained a better knowledge of how his car works and probably a better appreciation for the way his engine bay was designed and packaged by installing the filter kit.
_________________________
Cheers,
Jason

2009 Honda Ridgeline RTL
2005 Acura MDX Touring

Top
#3427376 - 07/17/14 10:35 AM Re: K&N Cool Air intake, '13 2.0L Dart [Re: Hokiefyd]
badtlc Offline


Registered: 06/08/06
Posts: 4996
Loc: KC
Originally Posted By: Hokiefyd
Originally Posted By: badtlc
You apparently missed the two previous posts of mine where I made that quite clear. There is little hard evidence showing K&N reduces engine life by a significant amount.


I didn't miss them. I think there's simply a difference in perspective among us. A filter that doesn't filter as well as another makes it a poorer filter. It doesn't necessarily make it a poor choice for use on a vehicle.

I'll bet there are tires out there that perform better than the ones on your car. That doesn't make your tires terrible. There are probably shoes that are more comfortable than the ones you're wearing. That doesn't make your shoes terrible. There's lunch that's likely more tasty than the one you'll have today. That doesn't make your lunch terrible. There are tradeoffs in everything. A theoretical loss in filtration of a performance filter might not affect the OP's engine life at all, and he gained a better knowledge of how his car works and probably a better appreciation for the way his engine bay was designed and packaged by installing the filter kit.


If they are the worst at doing their intended job, then they are terrible. Terrible is a relative term.
_________________________
2007 Ford Escape XLS 2.3L ATX, Trop Artic 5W30, Fram OCOD, 140k+
2015 Chrysler T&C, 45k+

Top
#3427518 - 07/17/14 12:36 PM Re: K&N Cool Air intake, '13 2.0L Dart [Re: Hokiefyd]
grampi Offline


Registered: 10/08/06
Posts: 6087
Loc: OH
Originally Posted By: Hokiefyd
Originally Posted By: badtlc
You apparently missed the two previous posts of mine where I made that quite clear. There is little hard evidence showing K&N reduces engine life by a significant amount.


I didn't miss them. I think there's simply a difference in perspective among us. A filter that doesn't filter as well as another makes it a poorer filter. It doesn't necessarily make it a poor choice for use on a vehicle.

I'll bet there are tires out there that perform better than the ones on your car. That doesn't make your tires terrible. There are probably shoes that are more comfortable than the ones you're wearing. That doesn't make your shoes terrible. There's lunch that's likely more tasty than the one you'll have today. That doesn't make your lunch terrible. There are tradeoffs in everything. A theoretical loss in filtration of a performance filter might not affect the OP's engine life at all, and he gained a better knowledge of how his car works and probably a better appreciation for the way his engine bay was designed and packaged by installing the filter kit.


You're wasting your time...it's obvious badtlc would rather argue about semantics than discuss facts...


Edited by grampi (07/17/14 12:37 PM)

Top
#3427549 - 07/17/14 01:07 PM Re: K&N Cool Air intake, '13 2.0L Dart [Re: grampi]
badtlc Offline


Registered: 06/08/06
Posts: 4996
Loc: KC
Originally Posted By: grampi

You're wasting your time...it's obvious badtlc would rather argue about semantics than discuss facts...


You have yet to realize I agree with you. That is the best part.
_________________________
2007 Ford Escape XLS 2.3L ATX, Trop Artic 5W30, Fram OCOD, 140k+
2015 Chrysler T&C, 45k+

Top
#3427657 - 07/17/14 03:08 PM Re: K&N Cool Air intake, '13 2.0L Dart [Re: badtlc]
grampi Offline


Registered: 10/08/06
Posts: 6087
Loc: OH
Originally Posted By: badtlc
Originally Posted By: grampi

You're wasting your time...it's obvious badtlc would rather argue about semantics than discuss facts...


You have yet to realize I agree with you. That is the best part.


So you say, but you continue to argue...me thinks you just like to argue...

Top
#3428140 - 07/18/14 05:01 AM Re: K&N Cool Air intake, '13 2.0L Dart [Re: grampi]
SteveSRT8 Offline


Registered: 10/10/08
Posts: 17691
Loc: Sunny Florida
Originally Posted By: grampi
Originally Posted By: badtlc
Originally Posted By: grampi

You're wasting your time...it's obvious badtlc would rather argue about semantics than discuss facts...


You have yet to realize I agree with you. That is the best part.


So you say, but you continue to argue...me thinks you just like to argue...


I believe an argument requires two folks...
_________________________
"In a democracy, dissent is an act of faith."
J. William Fulbright
Best ET-12.79 @ 111 mph
4340 pounds, Street tires
Just like we go to Publix

Top
#3429080 - 07/19/14 07:35 AM Re: K&N Cool Air intake, '13 2.0L Dart [Re: GumbyJarvis]
eddy21 Offline


Registered: 01/11/08
Posts: 169
Loc: FL
Here's one for the horsepower argument.

http://forums.focaljet.com/ti-vct-tuning...phs-inside.html
_________________________
15 Fiesta ST

Top
Page 4 of 5 < 1 2 3 4 5 >