They are not specifically calling out which of their HM products since they have both the 75k & 150k versions. The cleaning aspect probably from better base oil in the Restore & Protect. I only compare 150k HM vs R & P add packs. Both the VOA backs that up. Not sure what the add pack is on the 75k HM.I noticed this on the R&P site:
View attachment 216016
From what I understand they're tweaking the detergent/dispersant mix. Doesn't appear to be anything revolutionary.
Wish we knew more about it.
I think the cleaning is coming from the tweaking on the additive side somehow. Just a guess.They are not specifically calling out which of their HM products since they have both the 75k & 150k versions. The cleaning aspect probably from better base oil in the Restore & Protect. I only compare 150k HM vs R & P add packs. Both the VOA backs that up. Not sure what the add pack is on the 75k HM.
You don’t actually know that - you just post that same thing endlessly with zero curiosity … Dull …People are suckers for marketing claims.
Yeah, it’s like saying the oil formulators, the harmonizing agencies, and the OEM’s have stood still in time - but marketing marches on …Yeah I get tired of the "it's all marketing". When you sell a product you have to market it. What needs to be considered is if the marketing is legitimate in terms of the claims made and if so, how.......
Would you be happier if he said "The additive packages as portrayed on their VOAs are nearly identical"? It seems as if you are splitting hairs and not honoring the spirit of his statement.Even if the numbers are identical, you cannot make this type of deduction based on a VOA. You can say "they appear to be similar" but statements like that are a bit on the naive side.
Yes in my opinion that would be a much more accurate statement.Would you be happier if he said "The additive packages as portrayed on their VOAs are nearly identical"? It seems as if you are splitting hairs and not honoring the spirit of his statement.
Or even more accurate, the amounts of certain elements from decomposed compounds. None are "additive packages" and not all elements from the compounds are in the analysis.Yes in my opinion that would be a much more accurate statement.