Got to move up in the world. I have two Samsung M-500's that are just that, telephone use only. No text, email, web, etc. etc. Wife has been nagging me to move up to smartphones but with her back in school and not working, not looking forward to paying around 130-ish a month (Sprint) for two smartphones when I'm currently paying about 65 a month for both of ours.
Anyway, been reading on the advantages/disadvantages of cell phone contracts, specifically Boost Mobile, which is owned by Sprint. Is it cheaper, service wise, and still get all the bells and whistles? I know I'll have to pay a larger up front costs, but within a year, from what all I read, it would be cheaper to go with a no contract cell service. I'm really confused.
Anyway, been reading on the advantages/disadvantages of cell phone contracts, specifically Boost Mobile, which is owned by Sprint. Is it cheaper, service wise, and still get all the bells and whistles? I know I'll have to pay a larger up front costs, but within a year, from what all I read, it would be cheaper to go with a no contract cell service. I'm really confused.