Originally Posted by Buddyp
JAG, after reading your comment, I went to amsoil's page and looked up the differences. I googled everything, but maybe you guys can explain better. How does the descriptions (kinematic viscosity and such) correlate with the numbers.
Nice to see that you found the specs on AMSoil's site. They have very informative spec sheets. The critical number that is used to assess an oil's ability to protect an engine at high-speed, high-temperature operation is the HTHS viscosity, which is measured at 150 C. Since the 0w40 has an HTHS of 4.2, and the 5w40 is 4.3, I would say they are both safe to use, as SAE specifications require a min HTHS of 3.5 for 0w, 5w, and 10w-40 oils. You might see higher consumption with the 0w40, as the NOACK volatility is 10.9, and the 5w40 is 9.2. But even 10.9 is respectable. The 0w40 actually has higher kinematic viscosity at 100C, but yet it has lower HTHS. This is an indication that it has higher shear viscosity loss due to the presence of more viscosity index improver additive. The higher NOACK of the 0w40 also indicates that it has thinner base stock, and requires more VII additive to get the wide viscosity spread.
I think it would be worthwhile to run the 0w40 if you are cold-soaking in the north woods at -15F for days. Less stress on the cranking system for starting, and less oil pressure delay after startup.
JAG, after reading your comment, I went to amsoil's page and looked up the differences. I googled everything, but maybe you guys can explain better. How does the descriptions (kinematic viscosity and such) correlate with the numbers.
Nice to see that you found the specs on AMSoil's site. They have very informative spec sheets. The critical number that is used to assess an oil's ability to protect an engine at high-speed, high-temperature operation is the HTHS viscosity, which is measured at 150 C. Since the 0w40 has an HTHS of 4.2, and the 5w40 is 4.3, I would say they are both safe to use, as SAE specifications require a min HTHS of 3.5 for 0w, 5w, and 10w-40 oils. You might see higher consumption with the 0w40, as the NOACK volatility is 10.9, and the 5w40 is 9.2. But even 10.9 is respectable. The 0w40 actually has higher kinematic viscosity at 100C, but yet it has lower HTHS. This is an indication that it has higher shear viscosity loss due to the presence of more viscosity index improver additive. The higher NOACK of the 0w40 also indicates that it has thinner base stock, and requires more VII additive to get the wide viscosity spread.
I think it would be worthwhile to run the 0w40 if you are cold-soaking in the north woods at -15F for days. Less stress on the cranking system for starting, and less oil pressure delay after startup.
Last edited: