Recent Topics
First wax after paint job
by Audios - 10/18/19 02:31 PM
Fuel Mileage - Quick vs. Steady Acceleration
by onespiritbrain - 10/18/19 02:16 PM
Alternator, Battery Problem ?
by MasterSolenoid - 10/18/19 12:50 PM
Vaccum Oil Extractor
by ad244 - 10/18/19 11:50 AM
Mercedes C240 Engine Temperature
by NICAT - 10/18/19 11:20 AM
oil pressure went to 0 on the cummins
by motor_oil_madman - 10/18/19 11:01 AM
Renault at the edge of the abyss.
by PimTac - 10/18/19 10:39 AM
Power Washing
by buster - 10/18/19 10:02 AM
Contaminated fuel from fuel stations
by bonjo - 10/18/19 09:54 AM
TBN graph - is this a good way to look at OCI?
by TiGeo - 10/18/19 08:49 AM
$4 get peppercorns and a free grinder
by JLawrence08648 - 10/18/19 08:18 AM
Poll: Where do you purchase motor oil ?
by kstanf150 - 10/18/19 07:28 AM
Advantage of ethanol free fuel?
by mrdctaylor - 10/18/19 07:17 AM
2004 Cummins 480 CE Marine Engines
by jmichels - 10/18/19 06:29 AM
Deleted vs Non-Deleted UOA
by oakaro68 - 10/18/19 05:30 AM
3.2 V6 Cayenne oil help
by Abax25 - 10/18/19 04:16 AM
Can cops sit in the median with no lights on at night time?
by motor_oil_madman - 10/18/19 12:24 AM
Newest Members
Tequila009, JCunningham, TomStackhouse, Drinksprite, jmichels
69595 Registered Users
Who's Online Now
99 registered members (2015_PSD, 2dogs, 28oz, 4WD, 15 invisible), 2,136 guests, and 18 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums67
Topics296,143
Posts5,092,122
Members69,595
Most Online3,532
Jul 30th, 2019
Donate to BITOG
Print Thread
Hop To
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3
6.8mm to Replace Some 5.56 and 7.62 #4891899 10/09/18 12:47 PM
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 1,826
U
user52165 Offline OP
OP Offline
U
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 1,826

Last edited by user52165; 10/09/18 12:51 PM.
Re: 6.8mm to Replace Some 5.56 and 7.62 [Re: user52165] #4891921 10/09/18 01:12 PM
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 14,150
C
CT8 Offline
Offline
C
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 14,150
The tax payers pocket is truly bottomless.


2015 F150 2.7
2018 F350 6.2
Re: 6.8mm to Replace Some 5.56 and 7.62 [Re: CT8] #4891931 10/09/18 01:32 PM
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,163
ArrestMeRedZ Offline
Offline
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,163
Originally Posted by CT8
The tax payers pocket is truly bottomless.


Of course, because our soldiers and Marines don't deserve anything developed in the last 50 years. In fact, think of the savings in ammunition costs if we went back to muskets!

The total cost of this program will be less than the rounding error of the cost of a squadron of F-35s.

Re: 6.8mm to Replace Some 5.56 and 7.62 [Re: user52165] #4891941 10/09/18 01:52 PM
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 4,069
B
BMWTurboDzl Offline
Offline
B
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 4,069
err...and the rest of NATO?

I wonder if the COD fanboys are getting squeamish about being able to resell their .223/556

Last edited by BMWTurboDzl; 10/09/18 01:53 PM.

“It took untold generations to get you where you are. A little gratitude might be in order. If you’re going to insist on bending the world to your way, you better have your reasons.”

435i
Re: 6.8mm to Replace Some 5.56 and 7.62 [Re: user52165] #4891954 10/09/18 02:05 PM
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 3,942
R
Reddy45 Offline
Offline
R
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 3,942
.223/5.56 isn't going anywhere, and neither is 7.62.

Re: 6.8mm to Replace Some 5.56 and 7.62 [Re: user52165] #4891966 10/09/18 02:19 PM
Joined: Aug 2018
Posts: 511
W
wdn Offline
Offline
W
Joined: Aug 2018
Posts: 511
The United States Army have been saying the same thing for the past 30 years. I could not even count all the "future infantry weapons" DoD has spent large on and later abandoned.

Re: 6.8mm to Replace Some 5.56 and 7.62 [Re: user52165] #4891967 10/09/18 02:26 PM
Joined: Aug 2018
Posts: 511
W
wdn Offline
Offline
W
Joined: Aug 2018
Posts: 511
XM29 OICW (Objective Individual Combat Weapon) not to be confused with Advanced Individual Combat Weapon, and so on and so on, ad infinitum.

Not to be confused with Next Generation Squad Weapon.

Last edited by wdn; 10/09/18 02:42 PM.
Re: 6.8mm to Replace Some 5.56 and 7.62 [Re: user52165] #4891988 10/09/18 03:00 PM
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 386
Timo325 Online Content
Online Content
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 386
This is old news, but doesn't seem so here.

This is not the OICW program, and this is a relatively "cheap" program for the change that it is going to make. I'm including logistics chains, etc..

This program is likely going to happen.

Why?

Because we are having problems with M855 and others penetrating body armor. This is a deficiency that absolutely needs a solution for our warfighters. I believe most would agree, that they deserve this change.


2011 Odyssey Touring Elite 80k mi. M1 EP, 0W-20, FU
2008 Mustang GT 81k mi. Edge EP (Gold) 5W-20, FU

Re: 6.8mm to Replace Some 5.56 and 7.62 [Re: Reddy45] #4891991 10/09/18 03:09 PM
Joined: Dec 2016
Posts: 9,507
L
Linctex Offline
Offline
L
Joined: Dec 2016
Posts: 9,507
Originally Posted by Reddy45
.223/5.56 isn't going anywhere, and neither is 7.62.


I keep waiting for both to come back down to a $99 per 1000 rnds - wouldn't that be nice again.


"The evidence demands a verdict".
(Re:VOA)"it's nearly impossible to actually know the particular additives that are in there at what concentrations."
Re: 6.8mm to Replace Some 5.56 and 7.62 [Re: Timo325] #4891994 10/09/18 03:17 PM
Joined: Jan 2017
Posts: 3,206
M
maxdustington Offline
Offline
M
Joined: Jan 2017
Posts: 3,206
Originally Posted by Timo325

Because we are having problems with M855 and others penetrating body armor. This is a deficiency that absolutely needs a solution for our warfighters. I believe most would agree, that they deserve this change.
I thought the M855A1 improved performance significantly, having more penetration than 7.62 M80 at longer ranges. Keep in mind the 556 was designed for AR-15s, it is good that they design a cartridge and weapons together. That might have been the problem in the past, changing calibers is not so drastic if you are introducing a new gun with it.


97 GMC RCLB K2500LD L30/4L60
Re: 6.8mm to Replace Some 5.56 and 7.62 [Re: user52165] #4892027 10/09/18 03:52 PM
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 3,304
SubieRubyRoo Offline
Offline
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 3,304
If we had more of these, we wouldn't be talking about armor-penetrating capabilities...

Re: 6.8mm to Replace Some 5.56 and 7.62 [Re: maxdustington] #4892146 10/09/18 06:49 PM
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 386
Timo325 Online Content
Online Content
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 386
Originally Posted by maxdustington
Originally Posted by Timo325

Because we are having problems with M855 and others penetrating body armor. This is a deficiency that absolutely needs a solution for our warfighters. I believe most would agree, that they deserve this change.
I thought the M855A1 improved performance significantly, having more penetration than 7.62 M80 at longer ranges. Keep in mind the 556 was designed for AR-15s, it is good that they design a cartridge and weapons together. That might have been the problem in the past, changing calibers is not so drastic if you are introducing a new gun with it.


I will only speak to what I know is open source, and to that I will add the credible statement below:

Gen. Mark Milley testified to the Senate Armed Services Committee that the service's current M855A1 Enhanced Performance Round will not defeat enemy body armor plates similar to the U.S. military-issue rifle plates such as the Enhanced Small Arms Protective Insert, or ESAPI.


2011 Odyssey Touring Elite 80k mi. M1 EP, 0W-20, FU
2008 Mustang GT 81k mi. Edge EP (Gold) 5W-20, FU

Re: 6.8mm to Replace Some 5.56 and 7.62 [Re: ArrestMeRedZ] #4892255 10/09/18 08:26 PM
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 14,150
C
CT8 Offline
Offline
C
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 14,150
Originally Posted by ArrestMeRedZ
Originally Posted by CT8
The tax payers pocket is truly bottomless.


Of course, because our soldiers and Marines don't deserve anything developed in the last 50 years. In fact, think of the savings in ammunition costs if we went back to muskets!

The total cost of this program will be less than the rounding error of the cost of a squadron of F-35s.

The caliber was an issue back in 1962 !!!


2015 F150 2.7
2018 F350 6.2
Re: 6.8mm to Replace Some 5.56 and 7.62 [Re: ArrestMeRedZ] #4892256 10/09/18 08:27 PM
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 14,150
C
CT8 Offline
Offline
C
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 14,150
Originally Posted by ArrestMeRedZ
Originally Posted by CT8
The tax payers pocket is truly bottomless.


Of course, because our soldiers and Marines don't deserve anything developed in the last 50 years. In fact, think of the savings in ammunition costs if we went back to muskets!

The total cost of this program will be less than the rounding error of the cost of a squadron of F-35s.

The caliber was an issue back in 1962 !!! We are looking at a similar to a 7.62x39 ish performance, well a bit better.


2015 F150 2.7
2018 F350 6.2
Re: 6.8mm to Replace Some 5.56 and 7.62 [Re: SubieRubyRoo] #4892263 10/09/18 08:32 PM
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 14,150
C
CT8 Offline
Offline
C
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 14,150
Originally Posted by SubieRubyRoo
If we had more of these, we wouldn't be talking about armor-penetrating capabilities...
Kinda heavy to tote.


2015 F150 2.7
2018 F350 6.2
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3
Previous Thread
Index
Next Thread

BOB IS THE OIL GUY® Powered by UBB.threads™