Recent Topics
RV Freightliner Cummins ISB 6.7 oil question
by 1978elcamino - 01/21/20 11:48 AM
Why I became a pilot and not a doctor...
by jetman - 01/21/20 10:52 AM
Wrong oil or not ?
by M119 - 01/21/20 10:48 AM
30 monograde
by mpack88 - 01/21/20 10:15 AM
Extended life destroys copper?
by mpack88 - 01/21/20 09:49 AM
Project Farm Lucas transmission additive video
by 1978elcamino - 01/21/20 09:43 AM
1.8t 0w40, plus a situation.
by WMNN1988 - 01/21/20 09:25 AM
Mobil 1‚ĄĘ ESP X2 0W-20 US Availability
by TheIceStormof06 - 01/21/20 08:46 AM
Wire harness/connector
by Redright9 - 01/21/20 07:58 AM
Will You Jump Someone Else's Car?
by Gebo - 01/21/20 07:08 AM
NAPA Edge $20 A/R
by dblshock - 01/21/20 04:54 AM
8 Utes on test.
by Silk - 01/21/20 03:03 AM
Magnetic Socket Rails
by The Critic - 01/21/20 01:19 AM
Oreilly Select complete fuel system cleaner
by keantoken - 01/21/20 12:19 AM
Local Costco Has all Oils and Viscosities $10 Off
by SteveG4 - 01/21/20 12:14 AM
EBC Rotor Pictures
by BBDartCA - 01/20/20 11:28 PM
2012 Acura TSX Wagon
by WhyMe - 01/20/20 10:47 PM
Newest Members
reylafo, PastPresMike, RedBeard83, dfrybeck, ckinch1
70495 Registered Users
Who's Online Now
103 registered members (53' Stude, 2015_PSD, aquariuscsm, 90crvtec, 1978elcamino, AlaskaMike, 7 invisible), 2,199 guests, and 24 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums67
Topics300,388
Posts5,174,782
Members70,495
Most Online4,538
Jan 20th, 2020
Donate to BITOG
Print Thread
Hop To
Page 1 of 2 1 2
17 F150 3.5 v2 Eco, 9632 miles, 19220 total #4628596 01/08/18 07:23 PM
Joined: Aug 2015
Posts: 425
KJSmith Offline OP
OP Offline
Joined: Aug 2015
Posts: 425
UOA #2 from my '17 F150

Looking good.
Happy with the fuel dilution and TBN.
This is the full syn 5/30 Magnatec.

Last UOA

For those interested:
Sample mailed 12/15/17
Dropped of tracking 12/18/17
re appeared 12/31/17
Delivered 1/2/18
Sample posted 1/8/18





Last edited by KJSmith; 01/08/18 07:25 PM.
Re: 17 F150 3.5 v2 Eco, 9632 miles, 19220 total [Re: KJSmith] #4628603 01/08/18 07:31 PM
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 2,631
wwillson Offline
Administrator
Offline
Administrator
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 2,631
Is this 3.5 the dual port and direct injected version?

Re: 17 F150 3.5 v2 Eco, 9632 miles, 19220 total [Re: KJSmith] #4628604 01/08/18 07:31 PM
Joined: Jul 2016
Posts: 1,956
F
FlyNavyP3 Offline
Offline
F
Joined: Jul 2016
Posts: 1,956
Nice looking report, Magnatec continues to impress in EB 3.5 engines, what oil filter was used?


Luke
P-3C and P-8A Maritime Weapons and Tactics Instructor, Instructor Tactical Coordinator and Mission Commander
Re: 17 F150 3.5 v2 Eco, 9632 miles, 19220 total [Re: wwillson] #4628605 01/08/18 07:32 PM
Joined: Jul 2016
Posts: 1,956
F
FlyNavyP3 Offline
Offline
F
Joined: Jul 2016
Posts: 1,956
Originally Posted By: wwillson
Is this 3.5 the dual port and direct injected version?


2017+ should all be the 12 injector, port and direct 3.5 EB Gen 2.


Luke
P-3C and P-8A Maritime Weapons and Tactics Instructor, Instructor Tactical Coordinator and Mission Commander
Re: 17 F150 3.5 v2 Eco, 9632 miles, 19220 total [Re: KJSmith] #4628627 01/08/18 07:43 PM
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 381
O
Onug Offline
Offline
O
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 381
Looks great. Your wear metals should be cleaned out now. The next UOA should be very good.

I hope these 2nd Gen EBís donít beat up oil as badly as the 1st gen. Then again, Magnatec is magical unicorn juice for these motors. I canít wait to get to that stuff in my stash.

Thanks for the UOA!


2016 F-150 3.5L Ecoboost
Current Oil: Castrol Magnatec 5W-30 and Fram Ultra filter
Re: 17 F150 3.5 v2 Eco, 9632 miles, 19220 total [Re: wwillson] #4628628 01/08/18 07:43 PM
Joined: Aug 2015
Posts: 425
KJSmith Offline OP
OP Offline
Joined: Aug 2015
Posts: 425
Originally Posted By: wwillson
Is this 3.5 the dual port and direct injected version?


Yes sir.
It even idles right.

Re: 17 F150 3.5 v2 Eco, 9632 miles, 19220 total [Re: FlyNavyP3] #4628629 01/08/18 07:44 PM
Joined: Aug 2015
Posts: 425
KJSmith Offline OP
OP Offline
Joined: Aug 2015
Posts: 425
Originally Posted By: FlyNavyP3
Nice looking report, Magnatec continues to impress in EB 3.5 engines, what oil filter was used?


Motorcraft FL500s.

Re: 17 F150 3.5 v2 Eco, 9632 miles, 19220 total [Re: KJSmith] #4628644 01/08/18 07:55 PM
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 232
C
Carbon12 Offline
Offline
C
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 232
Looks like they are putting titanium in the Magnatec now too.

Re: 17 F150 3.5 v2 Eco, 9632 miles, 19220 total [Re: Carbon12] #4628650 01/08/18 07:58 PM
Joined: Aug 2015
Posts: 425
KJSmith Offline OP
OP Offline
Joined: Aug 2015
Posts: 425
Originally Posted By: Carbon12
Looks like they are putting titanium in the Magnatec now too.


I didn't catch that. Thanks

Checked the older UOA's I have.
It looks like it started with the change to full syn.

Re: 17 F150 3.5 v2 Eco, 9632 miles, 19220 total [Re: KJSmith] #4628863 01/09/18 02:33 AM
Joined: Sep 2015
Posts: 2,752
Z
zeng Offline
Offline
Z
Joined: Sep 2015
Posts: 2,752
Breaking in well, oil still serviceable.

Re: 17 F150 3.5 v2 Eco, 9632 miles, 19220 total [Re: KJSmith] #4628868 01/09/18 03:23 AM
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 3,526
L
Lubener Offline
Offline
L
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 3,526
I would have never run the original fill that long.


The "thinking" man's friend.
Re: 17 F150 3.5 v2 Eco, 9632 miles, 19220 total [Re: KJSmith] #4628923 01/09/18 06:37 AM
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 5,678
V
Virtus_Probi Offline
Offline
V
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 5,678
My memory could be faulty here, but I don't think Magnatec 5W30 was a low calcium formulation as of a year or two ago...this must be the dexos1 Gen 2 version.


2014 Forester XT, 111000 miles
Last Change;
M1 0W30 AFE
Tokyo Roki 15208AA170 filter
Re: 17 F150 3.5 v2 Eco, 9632 miles, 19220 total [Re: KJSmith] #4628927 01/09/18 06:47 AM
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 8,393
dnewton3 Online Content
Global Moderator
Online Content
Global Moderator
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 8,393
Break in wear still coming down.
Looks good; trending well.

Regardless of the intent (of which you and I may disagree) of the injection strategy, the end result is less fuel dilution overall. This and other UOAs on these "new" 2nd gen EBs shows the engines are receiving less raw fuel in the crankcase. Whereas I contend that the dilution has never been as horrific as some panic-stricken folks would claim, the reality of having less dilution can only be described as desirable.

Motor on!


The act of preventative maintenance, in and of itself, is FAR MORE important than brand/grade/base choices among lubes and filters.
- under maintaining something is akin to abuse/neglect; that can kill equipment by shortening the lifespan
- over maintaining something has never been proven to be anything but a waste of time and money
Re: 17 F150 3.5 v2 Eco, 9632 miles, 19220 total [Re: dnewton3] #4628984 01/09/18 08:25 AM
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 381
O
Onug Offline
Offline
O
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 381
Originally Posted By: dnewton3
Break in wear still coming down.
Looks good; trending well.

Regardless of the intent (of which you and I may disagree) of the injection strategy, the end result is less fuel dilution overall. This and other UOAs on these "new" 2nd gen EBs shows the engines are receiving less raw fuel in the crankcase. Whereas I contend that the dilution has never been as horrific as some panic-stricken folks would claim, the reality of having less dilution can only be described as desirable.

Motor on!


Iíll suggest it is too early to make that declaration. All the EB motors with fuel dilution that I can remember seeing here on the forum were higher mileage engines. Iím approaching 30k miles and have yet to see any fuel dilution. We might still see dilution issues on this motor as they wear in more, say 50,000 miles.


2016 F-150 3.5L Ecoboost
Current Oil: Castrol Magnatec 5W-30 and Fram Ultra filter
Re: 17 F150 3.5 v2 Eco, 9632 miles, 19220 total [Re: Onug] #4629358 01/09/18 02:37 PM
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 8,393
dnewton3 Online Content
Global Moderator
Online Content
Global Moderator
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 8,393
Originally Posted By: Onug
Originally Posted By: dnewton3
Break in wear still coming down.
Looks good; trending well.

Regardless of the intent (of which you and I may disagree) of the injection strategy, the end result is less fuel dilution overall. This and other UOAs on these "new" 2nd gen EBs shows the engines are receiving less raw fuel in the crankcase. Whereas I contend that the dilution has never been as horrific as some panic-stricken folks would claim, the reality of having less dilution can only be described as desirable.

Motor on!


Iíll suggest it is too early to make that declaration. All the EB motors with fuel dilution that I can remember seeing here on the forum were higher mileage engines. Iím approaching 30k miles and have yet to see any fuel dilution. We might still see dilution issues on this motor as they wear in more, say 50,000 miles.


I've seen no evidence that accumulation of miles makes for higher dilution. I would disagree with your assessment.

However, and this is more important, regardless of the dilution, the wear rates don't change much ovearll. My point being; the topic of dilution is moot. With the 2nd gen EBs, it will be one less thing people can complain about.

Last edited by dnewton3; 01/09/18 02:37 PM.

The act of preventative maintenance, in and of itself, is FAR MORE important than brand/grade/base choices among lubes and filters.
- under maintaining something is akin to abuse/neglect; that can kill equipment by shortening the lifespan
- over maintaining something has never been proven to be anything but a waste of time and money
Page 1 of 2 1 2
Previous Thread
Index
Next Thread

BOB IS THE OIL GUY® Powered by UBB.threads™