Why use anything other than a 0wXX oil?

Status
Not open for further replies.
quote:

Originally posted by truav8r:
...a thicker oil loses heat more slowly. But by the same token, it also absorbs heat more slowly.

So if the thicker oil does not absorb heat as quickly, then that means the heat is retained in the engine parts and therefore the engine will warm up faster, which is good is some respects.
 
Maybe...some of the great UOAs on GC are more from good start-up/warm-up visc than from HT/HS or +100c visc.
dunno.gif
 
quote:

Originally posted by Audi Junkie:
Maybe...some of the great UOAs on GC are more from good start-up/warm-up visc than from HT/HS or +100c visc.
dunno.gif


If the wear metals in a UOA reflect actual wear in the engine your statement above almost has to be correct. If 75+% of wear is at cold startup and GC demonstrates low wear - duh!

Look at the Consumer Reports Taxi report. No difference in measured wear between any of the oils after 60,000 miles, however, cold starts were not a major factor in these tests.
 
quote:

Originally posted by Audi Junkie:
Maybe...some of the great UOAs on GC are more from good start-up/warm-up visc than from HT/HS or +100c visc.
dunno.gif


I honestly don't think so, since a lot of the really good UOAs posted by GC users are from the summer, where it's actually thicker than a lot of oils on startup (it's 40C viscosity is thicker than most 5w30s and some 10w30s)

I think GC's good showing is simply from it's good base oil/additive combo. It's simply a well put together oil. Being a 0w oil doesn't really have much to do with it in a lot of the reports we see on here, since the people didn't drive in extreme cold during those runs.
 
with either 5w-40 or 0w-40 mobil 1 I see no difference in my Saab in the winter. I use M1 15w-50 in the summer. I still run 7000mi in a turbo car with 137000mi and absolutely no oil consumption. I thought that I would get some when I changed to syn, but I have had none to speak of. I am definitely a believer in the wide spread syns.
 
quote:

Originally posted by TallPaul:

quote:

Originally posted by truav8r:
...a thicker oil loses heat more slowly. But by the same token, it also absorbs heat more slowly.

So if the thicker oil does not absorb heat as quickly, then that means the heat is retained in the engine parts and therefore the engine will warm up faster, which is good is some respects.


I would rather have the oil absorbing some of the heat and circulating it throughout the engine instead of just having the area immidiately around the combustion chambers warming only.
 
Another chart for your perusal.

code:

Delvac1 * 1300S * Delo400 * PenzLL * Rotella * Syntec * Esso XD3 * Esso XD3

T(C) 5w40 * 15w40 * 15w40 * 15w40 * 15w40 * 5W50 * 0w30 * 0w40

-20 6339 11422 13924 9125 9347 4247 2962 3767

-10 2430 3950 4581 3313 3371 1836 1250 1624

0 1066 1592 1776 1389 1406 886 595 783

10 523 729 788 656 662 469 313 415

20 282 371 391 342 344 269 179 238

30 164 206 213 194 194 164 109 146

40 102.0 123.0 125.0 118.0 118 106.4 71.0 94.5

50 67.1 78.2 78.5 76.1 76.0 72.2 48.4 64.3

60 46.2 52.4 52.1 51.6 51.4 51.1 34.5 45.6

70 33.2 36.8 36.2 36.5 36.4 37.4 25.4 33.5

80 24.6 26.8 26.2 26.8 26.7 28.3 19.4 25.4

90 18.9 20.2 19.6 20.3 20.2 21.9 15.1 19.7

100 14.8 15.6 15.1 15.8 15.7 17.4 12.1 15.7

110 11.9 12.4 11.9 12.6 12.5 14.1 9.9 12.7

120 9.7 10.0 9.6 10.2 10.2 11.6 8.2 10.5

130 8.1 8.3 7.9 8.5 8.4 9.7 6.9 8.8

140 6.8 6.9 6.6 7.1 7.1 8.3 5.9 7.5

150 5.9 5.9 5.6 6.1 6.0 7.1 5.1 6.5


Enjoy!
smile.gif
 
Can you remove some of the 15w40s and add the Mobil1 5w30, 0w30, and the GC 0w30 side by side?

Just wondering, where are you getting these results?

My Esso XD-3 seems to be a little thicker than Mobil 1 0w30.

Ineresting results.
 
Hope this is what your after. You owe me a beer for all the reformatting.
grin.gif


code:

T(C) M1_0W40 GC_0W30 M1_0W30 M1_5W30 M1_10W30 M1_0W20 Delvac1 XD3_0w30 XD3_0w40

-20 2662 2609 1995 2225 3425 1713 6339 2962 3767

-10 1198 1127 872 945 1333 731 2430 1250 1624

0 599 547 428 453 596 353 1066 595 783

10 328 292 231 240 298 189 523 313 415

20 193 169 135 138 164 110 282 179 238

30 121 104 85 86 98 68.3 164 109 146

40 80.0 68.4 56.0 56.0 62.0 45.1 102.0 71.0 94.5

50 55.4 47.0 38.8 38.5 41.6 31.3 67.1 48.4 64.3

60 39.8 33.7 28.1 27.7 29.2 22.6 46.2 34.5 45.6

70 29.7 25.0 21.0 20.6 21.4 17.0 33.2 25.4 33.5

80 22.7 19.1 16.2 15.8 16.1 13.1 24.6 19.4 25.4

90 17.8 15.0 12.8 12.4 12.5 10.4 18.9 15.1 19.7

100 14.3 12.0 10.3 10.0 10.0 8.4 14.8 12.1 15.7

110 11.7 9.8 8.5 8.2 8.1 6.9 11.9 9.9 12.7

120 9.8 8.2 7.1 6.9 6.7 5.8 9.7 8.2 10.5

130 8.2 6.9 6.0 5.8 5.7 5.0 8.1 6.9 8.8

140 7.0 5.9 5.2 5.0 4.9 4.3 6.8 5.9 7.5

150 6.1 5.1 4.5 4.3 4.2 3.7 5.9 5.1 6.5


 
You know I love you for it, and it really is interesting for comparitive purposes.

For example, I run Esso XD-3 Synthetic and I can see that it is quite thicker than Mobil 1 0w30 at the same temperature range.

Wonder if I did the wrong thing by using this oil?

Do you have any readings for Castrol Syntec 5w30?
 
quote:

Originally posted by 427Z06:
Hope this is what your after. You owe me a beer for all the reformatting.
grin.gif


code:

T(C) M1_0W40 GC_0W30 M1_0W30 M1_5W30 M1_10W30 M1_0W20 Delvac1 XD3_0w30 XD3_0w40

-20 2662 2609 1995 2225 3425 1713 6339 2962 3767

-10 1198 1127 872 945 1333 731 2430 1250 1624

0 599 547 428 453 596 353 1066 595 783

10 328 292 231 240 298 189 523 313 415

20 193 169 135 138 164 110 282 179 238

30 121 104 85 86 98 68.3 164 109 146

40 80.0 68.4 56.0 56.0 62.0 45.1 102.0 71.0 94.5

50 55.4 47.0 38.8 38.5 41.6 31.3 67.1 48.4 64.3

60 39.8 33.7 28.1 27.7 29.2 22.6 46.2 34.5 45.6

70 29.7 25.0 21.0 20.6 21.4 17.0 33.2 25.4 33.5

80 22.7 19.1 16.2 15.8 16.1 13.1 24.6 19.4 25.4

90 17.8 15.0 12.8 12.4 12.5 10.4 18.9 15.1 19.7

100 14.3 12.0 10.3 10.0 10.0 8.4 14.8 12.1 15.7

110 11.7 9.8 8.5 8.2 8.1 6.9 11.9 9.9 12.7

120 9.8 8.2 7.1 6.9 6.7 5.8 9.7 8.2 10.5

130 8.2 6.9 6.0 5.8 5.7 5.0 8.1 6.9 8.8

140 7.0 5.9 5.2 5.0 4.9 4.3 6.8 5.9 7.5

150 6.1 5.1 4.5 4.3 4.2 3.7 5.9 5.1 6.5



For Castrol Syntec 5w30 I was using before:

-20 2398
-10 1011
0 482
10 254
20 146
30 90
40 58.5
50 40.2
60 28.7
70 21.3
80 16.3
90 12.8
100 10.3
110 8.44
120 7.04
130 5.96
140 5.11
150 4.44
 
This is very interesting. Using the vis calculator (Module 3) and the figures in 427Z's chart, M1 5w30 is "thinner" than GC 0w30 until between -50C and -60C. I wonder if M1 5w30 is really a 0w30 in disguise, and who knows what their 0w30 is?
 
By the looks of it, it will shear down fast either way.

The Mobil 1 0w30 is just too thin for my liking.
 
M1 shear down? I guess I've never experienced that, and haven't heard of too many people with sound mechanicals where that has happened either. And 0W too thin? Thin is "in", especially at cold start winter temps. I wouldn't use anything else.
 
427Z06 - You owe me a beer for all the reformatting.

We owe you more than a few beers for all your fine work.

Thanks!
worshippy.gif
 
quote:

Originally posted by haley10:

quote:

Originally posted by kevm14:

quote:

Originally posted by Blue99:
As we can see, M1 5w30 is a thinner viscosity than GC 0w30 until the temp is well below 0 C.

Unless I'm reading the chart wrong, M1 5w30 is thinner across every single temperature, from -20*C to 150*C. This is why I get confused - why is GC a 0W when the M1 is a 5W? Would that make the M1 0w30 more like a -5w30 (as compared to GC)??


It's marketing. Manufacturer's recommend 5w30 and 5W-20 not 0W anything. It doesn't mean that these oils would not meet these specs. Gotta look at MRV and CCS #'s to be meaningful.

SNIP


Actually, the owner's manual on a 2004 Chevy Impala I skimmed last fall says you are reccomended to use 5W30 convetional oil, but you may use 0W30 synthetic if you'll be operating the vehicle in extreme cold.
 
Motor Oils - Fuel Economy vs. Wear By Blaine Ballentine, Central Petroleum Company:

Viscosity and Wear
Thinner oils have less drag, and therefore less friction and wear...

Any abrasive particles equal to or larger than the oil film thickness will cause wear. Filters are necessary to keep contaminants small. The other side of the equation is oil film thickness. Thicker oil films can accommodate larger contaminants.

Temperature has a big effect on viscosity and film thickness. As a point of reference, one SAE grade increase in viscosity is necessary to overcome the influence of a 20°F increase in engine temperature. At a given reference point, there is approximately a 20°F. difference between viscosity grades SAE 30, 40 and 50. SAE 20 is somewhat closer to 30 than the other jumps, because SAE 30 must be 30°F higher than SAE 20 to be roughly the equivalent viscosity.

In other words, an SAE 20 at 190°F is about the same kinematic viscosity as an SAE 30 at 220°F, which is about the same viscosity as an SAE 40 at 240°F. This approximation works well in the 190°F to 260°F temperature range. One might be surprised at the slight amount of difference between straight viscosity vs. multi-viscosity oils with the same back number (for example, SAE 30, SAE 5w30, and SAE 10w30).

If an SAE 50 oil at 260°F is as thin as an SAE 20 oil at 190°F, imagine how thin the oil film becomes when you are using an SAE 5W-20 and your engine overheats. When an engine overheats, the oil film becomes dangerously thin and can rupture.

Ford is bumping up against its CAFE requirements and recommends SAE 5W-20 oil for most of its engines in the United States. It claims SAE 5W-20 is optimal for fuel efficiency AND wear.

(If your engine is 20 F cooler running a thinner oil then the viscosity is the same as the next higher weight grade. Also, as wear diminishes with temperature then we have a benefit. Another benefit is that the thinner oil is better at startup where the majority of wear occurs. Looking at the above data 10 C cooler (140 C) is much thicker HTHS and therefore no penalty.)

aehaas
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom