Originally Posted By: Stelth
Last week, there was another pit bull attack, this time less than a mile from my house. This time, a pit bull attacked an eight-year-old boy in a local park, and bit off his ear, and bit his cheek and arm. There were actually two pit bulls running loose in the park at the time, but it's not clear to me if both were involved in the attack. One of the pit bulls was captured and turned over to Animal Control, and one was euthanized on the spot with a couple of loads of buckshot when it charged a police officer.
I love dogs, but I sure wouldn't own a pit bull.
Locally there was just a similar incident, except the article was titled "dog attack". Besides biting some people, the dogs killed a bunch of sheep (like, a bunch of them!). Buried somewhere down in the article was a mention that the dogs were a "Labrador-type dog". Point being, breed only seems to be mentioned front and center when a pit bull-type dog is involved. The problem isn't "pit bulls" it's "two dogs running loose". If any dog is "running loose" in a public area where leashes are required, then you already know you know you're dealing with animals owned by an irresponsible owner. Lots of folks who own dogs have no business owning them.
Of course, that won't stop the litany of factually untrue nonsense being spewed, such as "pit bulls are trained to attack". Truth is, human aggression in the breed is not a breed trait, unlike many of the large "protection" type dogs. They're actually pretty lousy guardians. The 10 lb mutt I took in is way more protective of the house than my 8 yr old pit bull.