Originally Posted By: Kurtatron
Do you guys know any people like I do? It really frustrates me. There are people that have a cheap complex, to the point it is annoying to neighbors. You know the types. Don’t want to eat out at anything fancier than KFC. Complain about parking fees. Complain about National park fee tickets. This behavior translates into car ownership habits as well. I am all for financial responsibility, but when it comes to owning a 20 year old rust bucket that's leaking fluids, awfully worn suspension, I just think these types are possibly endangering the public. I have heard stories of someone snapping an axle in half due to never replacing the cv joint, clutch failure due to never replacing clutch fluid, engine failure on the freeway. Does this irritate you guys as much as me? There comes a point when I think people should just replace old cars, just out of consideration of involving someone else in in their catastrophic breakdowns.
I can't find anything in the first statements that I would feel justified in valuing; I would not berate people for saving money on food (except at the expense of a family unit's health, which is objectively pursue-able and achievable.) BUT, the latter half of your original post deserves a nod if not respect, particularly from an ethical POV:
Originally Posted By: Gimpy1
The way I look at ANY type of maintenance especially cars is that I have invested a substantial amount of my hard earned money to purchase something, in this case a car. For most people purchasing a vehicle is the second largest purchase you will ever make, a house being the first. If I can extend the usable life of my purchase I will get more return on my investment. Secondly regular maintenance and replacement of components that are designed to be replaced is actually CHEAPER than replacing parts when they fail. Example, it is much easier and cheaper to replace brake pads and machine rotors, then to wait until the rotors are damaged from pads that have been worn down to the rivets. Regular fluid changes are much cheaper than replacing an engine, trans or diff. Regular maintenance ensures my safety and that of my family. There is nothing worse than having a tire blow out at 75 mph because you wanted to get that last 32nd below the wear indicator, yea you saved a few hundred dollars not buying new tires, but now the car is damaged there goes a $500 dollar deductible or God forbid you have an accident and your kid get injured. Sorry but my family's health is worth far more than that. My opinion is that there a lot of ways to save money, regular maintenance is not a place where you skimp, because in the long run being cheap is expensive.
To answer your question, yes I know people. Yes it upsets me. Automobile inspections should exist to objectively set the standard for safely navigating the road for a year.
Originally Posted By: Kurtatron
I just think there are people, in the interest of saving as much money as possible, are inadvertently endangering themselves and others. In the absence of a decent inspection rule, people can be driving in unsafe vehicles, and hurt others. This can be ignorance or just hubris. Some say I shouldn’t mind other’s business, but I will mind their business if it endangers others. It’s like that old saying: driving is a privilege, not a right. If I had the mentality to ignore things like a tire ready to blow, I am risking myself and others.
FWIW, I can see myself making the stupid decision to limp my car back home after a decent accident, which would potentially put others in danger in the event that something damaged finally fails while on my way home. I just have to forgive them, since I could very well make just as bad decisions. Doesn't mean change the standard either, though.