After reading some of the comments it really makes me appreciate everyone on BITOG even more.All kind of good comments/responses by LSJ over on the video comments....I wonder if he is here somewhere?
After reading some of the comments it really makes me appreciate everyone on BITOG even more.All kind of good comments/responses by LSJ over on the video comments....I wonder if he is here somewhere?
All kind of good comments/responses by LSJ over on the video comments....I wonder if he is here somewhere?
Oh yeah never under his name but as a lurker/troll...yes!Lol, if I were him I might be here, but I'd certainly never post under my name. There's too much mudslinging online. Even if you were the foremost expert on a subject and invented it you'd still get some person online telling you that you don't know what you're talking about. (This is just an example, I'm not advocating either way that LSJr is or isn't something). The internet is such a dumpster fire these days it isn't worth the stress or time for someone like that to expose themselves to it (or rather more than what you'd already signed up for).
I figured the sharper than me guys (most folks here) would be all over this.
OK just for a second read and follow..........
Assume the old oil from 1990 never aged. Preserved perfectly in time. Run an oxidation test. Number is 20 (just made that up for example)
Now run a test on the oil, with same name in 2024. Run an oxidation test. Number is 10. (just made that up for example)
We can really conclude nothing solid, other than yes the numbers ARE different. Why would this be?
The oxidation number has just as much to do with the initial oil constituents than it does with aging. A high ester oil will have a high oxidation number. Oxidation tests are basically only useful to compare the EXACT same virgin oil, NEW then USED, to see delta oxidation.
This is not the first time this showboat has been wrong. We are wise here not to follow him, IMHO. BITOG should gently point out Lake Speed's inaccuracies.
I see what you did there!Not saying I'm sharper than you, but I haven't watched the video and feel no need to
If it's an electrical pressure transducer and gauge system (likely as I think mechanical oil pressure gauges went away a long time ago in mass production cars) it might be your gauge rather than actual pressure fluctuations.I am wondering if that is why I intermittently have fluctuating oil pressure on my 1997 Dodge Ram 5.9 magnum; maybe my oil from my 10+ year old stash (10w-30 Pennzoil Platinum) lost its’ anti-foaming ability and it is getting foamy and the oil pump is sucking in foamy oil?
I might try fresh oil next change to see if there is a difference.
Easy way to find out: run some new oil in it.If it's an electrical pressure transducer and gauge system (likely as I think mechanical oil pressure gauges went away a long time ago in mass production cars) it might be your gauge rather than actual pressure fluctuations.
I can still view itWhy did he make the video private?
I can still view it
I just searched it and it popped right up..weird.NVm. It was down a few days ago. It's back up.
I know @Tom NJ has said multuple times mobil 1 in the 70s was using POE and in the 80s they used diesters before going back to POE in the 90sWater causes oxidation. Take the M1 in the can as an example. We know it has no ester because M1 wasn't using it at the time.
The degree of oxidation is irrelevant because the oxidation number is on the high side and there's water in the oil. End of story.
I just searched it and it popped right up..weird.
It's also still under his video list.
Why did he make the video private?
Purdy colors