Don’t Believe Everything About Supplements

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
May 2, 2011
Messages
298
Location
USA
Don’t Believe Everything You Hear: Supplements Are Safe

Tuesday, October 11, 2011
by Dr. Julian Whitaker

Some of you may have seen on the news last night or read in the paper this morning about a new study published in the Archives of Internal Medicine on multivitamins and other nutritional supplements. One typical headline screamed, “Vitamins Tied to Higher Death Rates in Older Women…”

Folks, this stuff may increase nightly news ratings and sell newspapers, but in the end it’s doing more harm than good.

In case you aren’t familiar with the study and its findings, researchers followed approximately 40,000 women whose ages were 55-69 at the start of the study for an average of 19 years. Based on questionnaires these women filled out in 1986, 1997, and 2004 and comparing them with death rates, they determined that the women who took certain nutritional supplements had a slightly increased risk of death.

Let’s look at some other critical findings:

1. The most significant risk was with supplemental iron, which was associated with a 3.9 percent increased risk of death. This isn’t news. It is well known that excess iron is linked with increased risk of cardiovascular disease and other conditions and should be taken only by individuals diagnosed with anemia.

2. The calculated overall risk of death was only slightly higher among the women who took multivitamins: 40.8% vs 39.8%.

3. The study design was observational, meaning it did not allow the researchers to determine any specific causes for the slightly increased mortality among those reporting to take certain nutrients.

Nothing in this study compels me to change my recommendations regarding nutritional supplements. An editorial piece published along with the study suggests we should get be able to get adequate vitamins and minerals from diet alone—yet large government studies reveal tremendous gaps in the average American diet and widespread nutritional deficiencies.

Here’s the bottom line: Don’t stop taking your supplements. Other more credible research clearly demonstrates the value of targeted nutritional supplementation. You can find my complete daily nutrient recommendations on my website at www.drwhitaker.com.

Now it’s your turn: Which nutrients do you take?

You may also be interested in:

Supplement Facts: Did You Know?

Are Your Drugs Robbing You of Nutrients?

Source
 
Man, there's one thing I don't do... believe everything I read!

Thanks for putting this out there. Maybe someone will benefit.

FWIW, I am a big supplement taker, 55, and according to my Doctor one of the healthiest men he works on. I take NO prescriptions of any kind and am very interested in Traditional Chinese medicine and ayurvedic medicine as well.
 
Hi,

I think a lot of the "news" we see on TV is actually funded by big pharma and trying to talk people out of buying vitamins so they can sell more drugs. We need to separate the wheat from the chaff. It's always better to get nourishment from whole foods, but there may be many times when this is just not enough.
 
Originally Posted By: wallyuwl

Isn't that better? I mean, can't we just trust the drug companies in that they'll make supplements available at a fair price, and in steady supply?

http://www.foxnews.com/health/2011/10/13...h-prove-costly/


Personally, I'd never believe it in 1,000,000 years. Big pharma is like a wolf in sheep's clothing. Fine, if you want the rich to get richer and to go to an MD to get a prescription for Vitamin C, and then pay $25 per gram of it, when right now you can buy it w/o an Rx for a fraction of that.
 
Whats to stop big Pharma from putting in additional substances to make you more inclined to be dependent on the meds...resulting in a perpetual repeat customer...
 
Originally Posted By: Scoot_4_20


Personally, I'd never believe it in 1,000,000 years. Big pharma is like a wolf in sheep's clothing. Fine, if you want the rich to get richer and to go to an MD to get a prescription for Vitamin C, and then pay $25 per gram of it, when right now you can buy it w/o an Rx for a fraction of that.



+1, and then some doctors will cry foul for not making $$$$ writing these prescriptions... And how much liability there is in prescribing vitamin C.
 
Originally Posted By: Scoot_4_20
Originally Posted By: wallyuwl

Isn't that better? I mean, can't we just trust the drug companies in that they'll make supplements available at a fair price, and in steady supply?

http://www.foxnews.com/health/2011/10/13...h-prove-costly/


Personally, I'd never believe it in 1,000,000 years. Big pharma is like a wolf in sheep's clothing. Fine, if you want the rich to get richer and to go to an MD to get a prescription for Vitamin C, and then pay $25 per gram of it, when right now you can buy it w/o an Rx for a fraction of that.



I'm being sarcastic.

Go read that article I linked to.
 
Originally Posted By: Scoot_4_20
I think a lot of the "news" we see on TV is actually funded by big pharma


We couldn't believe it when we were in the states all the drug advertising through the news (and everything else). We've got advertising too, but only over the counter stuff can be advertised, not prescription.

They save prescription advertising for eye charts and stuff in Dr. surgery.
 
My concern with supplements, especially the weird stuff my wife takes (can't get her to stop) they are not clinically verified to help anything, they could be coming out of vermin infested barn, and in the best case may not be needed.


The Vitamin industry is a pill looking for a condition. Having said that I take maybe 3 multiple vitamin/mineral pills a week and a Calcium/magnesium/Vitamin supplement.
 
Originally Posted By: Al


The Vitamin industry is a pill looking for a condition.


And the pharmaceutical industry backed by the bought and paid for FDA is not? I see vastly more ads on TV and online for prescription drugs, than I do for vitamins.
 
Originally Posted By: Drew99GT

And the pharmaceutical industry backed by the bought and paid for FDA is not? I see vastly more ads on TV and online for prescription drugs, than I do for vitamins.

Without passing judgment on the drug industry. My confidence is that when I take my Verapamil pill it will help my BP. If I take an antibiotic I have confidence that it will cure my bronchitis. Same with my Cardura for my Prostate, etc.

I have no clue if Alfa Lipoic Acid will help or kill me.
 
Last edited:
Vitamins, minerals and essential fatty acids are scientifically proven essential nutrients that humans need that exists naturally in food. They have the least chance of causing harm taken at the recommended dosage. No normal human physiology requires any prescription drugs. A few prescriptions may be helpful or necessay to treat pathology, but many if not most are not. The side effects and effects on physiology of most prescriptions does more harm than good.

Drugs masking one sympton with others, some not known or seen till much later is not a cure.
 
Originally Posted By: Al
Drew99GT said:
My confidence is that when I take my Verapamil pill it will help my BP. If I take an antibiotic I have confidence that it will cure my bronchitis. Same with my Cardura for my Prostate, etc.

I have no clue if Alfa Lipoic Acid will help or kill me.


Then you are not a very good consumer.
 
I don't think that you can have complete confidence in the drugs, but at least it is better than listening to the ads on TV for all the supplements and natural medicines that if you were to believe them it would solve all of the illnesses. However I've noticed that they all have disclaimers on them so you kind of have to or should take their claims with a grain of salt.
 
Originally Posted By: 65cuda
I don't think that you can have complete confidence in the drugs, but at least it is better than listening to the ads on TV for all the supplements and natural medicines that if you were to believe them it would solve all of the illnesses. However I've noticed that they all have disclaimers on them so you kind of have to or should take their claims with a grain of salt.


CQ-10:
"Helps support heart and vessel function"

This statement has not been evaluated by the Food and Drug Administratiion. This product is not intended to diagnose, treat, cure or prevent any disease"

Unless someone can give me a reputable Hospital or University research Paper stating that this product has specified benefits..I'll pass...thanks.
 
And the FDA tested and approved side effect of some listed BP medication includes increased risk of heart attack ?
 
I've been taking suppliments for many, many years.

I feel great, look 10 years younger than I am & haven't been sick with a Cold or Flu in 17 Years!

...and never had a Flu Shot, either!
 
Al, you should read more. There is a great deal of evidence supporting the use of Co-Q-10, or it's more effective version, ubiquinol.

No heart attack victims are found with any appreciable level of this in their blood. Think about it.

Policanosol and red yeast rice lowers cholesterol as good as most of the liver killing statin drugs that are out there. But you can't patent it or license it for exclusive distribution.

Vitamins and other supplements require a bit of 'reading between the lines' to research them properly. A good friend of mine was able to stop his diabetic meds after taking gymnema sylvestre and cinnamon! All under the supervision of his doctor. BTW, the doctor recommended C0-Q-10 because he takes a statin!!!

Traditional Chinese Medicine and Ayurvedic medicine from India are much older and wiser than we are. In our country we are great with trauma but we stink on degenerative disease treatments.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom