I found this interesting. Perhaps there is much room for improvement for the ICE.
Last edited:
The claims on efficiency improvement are quite high.Not likely to be worthwhile. The additional surface area increases heat transfer and reduces efficiency.
That design has merit. As it produces specific flow patterns.I’d trust Volvo.
Technology award for wave piston design that lowers fuel consumption
The Volvo Group’s new truck engines are more fuel efficient as a result of their intelligent piston design. Waves have been added to the piston crown to improve the use of oxygen. The engineers behind the innovation have now received the Volvo Technology Award 2017.www.volvogroup.com
That's what I though too. The only reason for dimpling is to mandate where the combustion will be. In a spark ignition engine it makes no sense other than a central one to guide the ignition timing etc. Mazda did that with SkyactivG and X. The all over the place dimples doesn't do jack and if they say everyone is unique stay the heck away. The last thing you want in engineering and manufacturing is "everyone is unique".T The dimpling in the quench area of the piston was trapping air and fuel and becoming essentially a small combustion chamber. If it made any sort of difference, it would already be commonplace in professional racing engines. There's a reason it's not. Every few years, this comes back into the spotlight. Somebody gets an itch to try it out as if they're pioneering something only to go silent when they come to the same conclusion as many before them.
I remember getting "pop-up" pistons for my 1965 Mustang with 289 engine. Are dimpled same as pop-up?
I did it at 17 years old not knowing a whole lot about engines. But yes to increase compression ratio.No. The term "pop-up pistons" refers to dome pistons. The piston has a plateau raised above the piston crown to reduce chamber volume thus increasing the compression ratio. The 289 has a short stroke which limits how much volume can be compressed. (given all other variables are equal) To counter this, you either have to reduce the head's chamber volume or put a "pop-up" on the piston to achieve a higher compression ratio. The later is the easiest and most common way to do that. Reducing chamber volume is a big can of worms as doing such effects valve shrouding, flame propagation, turbulent flame speed, squish direction, etc...
I try to avoid dome pistons as the dome acts as an obstacle to flame propagation, slowing down the flame speed, and thus reducing efficiency. It can also become a hot spot for detonation.
AH, the Honda VR!I like this design better. Not because it creates more efficiency or power. It just plain looks cool. I'm not even a Honda Fanboy. Allit needs is fractured rod connector seams to make it the best!
View attachment 210614
I…. Don’t understand. What is this beast of a cylinder-boring and ring tension catastrophe?