Originally Posted by daves87rs
Ford (and GM) forgot what these trucks were for- Affordable trucks to get you hooked to be the bigger model down the road. These trucks weren't as fancy, but they were affordable. Heck, after my s10 I was looking at a Silverado.....
Nothing wrong with having a few higher priced models, but they need some affordable models to get people into their truck family.....
Ding ding ding. You hit it, Dave.
The Ranger and Canyonado are just not different enough in size compared to the full ride offerings. Courier, LUV, Toyota, Dodge 50, Datsun and even Mitsubishi trucks of the 70s: small trucks.Even Ranger and S-10 from the 80s: perfect size. Not sort of smaller trucks. Like the "intermediates" of the 70s : couple of inches and a couple of hundred pounds less than the big fat ridiculous full size sedans.
I can't imagine daily driving a current year F-150 or similar monster. At least they'll hold a lot of debt in those 12 ft beds.
Ford (and GM) forgot what these trucks were for- Affordable trucks to get you hooked to be the bigger model down the road. These trucks weren't as fancy, but they were affordable. Heck, after my s10 I was looking at a Silverado.....
Nothing wrong with having a few higher priced models, but they need some affordable models to get people into their truck family.....
Ding ding ding. You hit it, Dave.
The Ranger and Canyonado are just not different enough in size compared to the full ride offerings. Courier, LUV, Toyota, Dodge 50, Datsun and even Mitsubishi trucks of the 70s: small trucks.Even Ranger and S-10 from the 80s: perfect size. Not sort of smaller trucks. Like the "intermediates" of the 70s : couple of inches and a couple of hundred pounds less than the big fat ridiculous full size sedans.
I can't imagine daily driving a current year F-150 or similar monster. At least they'll hold a lot of debt in those 12 ft beds.
Last edited: