Yes. And no. It's a Toyota, so that means (statistically) higher reliability. But anything can be abused. Just like anything else.
Over 300k on the clock? Not worth $3,500! Running AWD CUV with no known problems, maybe $1,500, I could see $2k perhaps, but that's out the door price. That's a lot of miles. I'd pay half that with the hopes of getting say 20-40k out of it, you know, 2 or maybe 3 years of life--but as a typical beater car. You know, buy, get a few years, toss. Lather rinse repeat. At $3k I'd rather buy a FWD sedan with less miles.
I'm kinda surprised, 2009 would have had the 2.4L (I don't see any V6 badges), and those tended to have problems (head gaskets and oil burning in the Camry's, oil burning in the RAV4). For that reason alone I'd probably avoid this one.