OK,
What is the methodology used here?
I see 20+ year old cars compared to cars that were not even available when the car was out? So are we even comparing apples to apples?
I saw someone suggest the Vibe is more reliable. Not disputing that. I would hope a car that is a decade newer would be more reliable than something from the mid-90s.
My point isn't that the Contour is a serious contender to the Corolla for reliability. I've owned both and hands down, the Corolla is the better screwed together car. My point is the site upon which you are relying upon to bolster your point seems to be short on data.
How do cars like the Cruise and Focus rate BELOW the Cavalier and the Escort, or even the Contour?
Relying on auction data, which it appears the site does, seems to focus on the cars people are dumping, without any measurement of the cars that people keep.
I've owned three of them. They had their issues, but were fun cars to drive. Yet at the same time, they had their weak spots and are not as reliable as a Toyota of the same era. So any buyer needs to go in eyes wide open.
But I'm not sure that Dashboard Light is the end-all, be-all for reliability data.
My gut feeling, and it's just that, is that compared to similar vintage cars, it's going to hover around average. Not as good as the Hondas and Toyotas of the late 1990s, but better than some other options on the market.
Parts will be cheap, but you'll need more, because it will break more.
I've moved to the middle of the two extremes. I drive Mazdas now
I get the great handling I had in the Contour and closer to the Toyota reliability I got with my Prizm, Corolla, Vibe and Camry.
Just something about that site that leaves me wanting. But on the other hand, I get it. I've moved on from the CDW-27 platform...
Originally Posted By: Imp4
Originally Posted By: javacontour
Not to say that a 22 year old Contiur is going to be more reliable than a similar vintage Toyota. But it will probably be more fun to drive.
Fun to drive when referring to a 22 year old Ford Contour?!?
Erm?!? OK.
On a totally separate issue, what good is fun to drive when you are broken down on the side of the road?
Here's some of the data from Dashboard Light (formerly Long Term Quality Index).
What is the methodology used here?
I see 20+ year old cars compared to cars that were not even available when the car was out? So are we even comparing apples to apples?
I saw someone suggest the Vibe is more reliable. Not disputing that. I would hope a car that is a decade newer would be more reliable than something from the mid-90s.
My point isn't that the Contour is a serious contender to the Corolla for reliability. I've owned both and hands down, the Corolla is the better screwed together car. My point is the site upon which you are relying upon to bolster your point seems to be short on data.
How do cars like the Cruise and Focus rate BELOW the Cavalier and the Escort, or even the Contour?
Relying on auction data, which it appears the site does, seems to focus on the cars people are dumping, without any measurement of the cars that people keep.
I've owned three of them. They had their issues, but were fun cars to drive. Yet at the same time, they had their weak spots and are not as reliable as a Toyota of the same era. So any buyer needs to go in eyes wide open.
But I'm not sure that Dashboard Light is the end-all, be-all for reliability data.
My gut feeling, and it's just that, is that compared to similar vintage cars, it's going to hover around average. Not as good as the Hondas and Toyotas of the late 1990s, but better than some other options on the market.
Parts will be cheap, but you'll need more, because it will break more.
I've moved to the middle of the two extremes. I drive Mazdas now
Just something about that site that leaves me wanting. But on the other hand, I get it. I've moved on from the CDW-27 platform...
Originally Posted By: Imp4
Originally Posted By: javacontour
Not to say that a 22 year old Contiur is going to be more reliable than a similar vintage Toyota. But it will probably be more fun to drive.
Fun to drive when referring to a 22 year old Ford Contour?!?
Erm?!? OK.
On a totally separate issue, what good is fun to drive when you are broken down on the side of the road?
Here's some of the data from Dashboard Light (formerly Long Term Quality Index).