M1
Quote:
^^^^
What's a "1995 Pontiac Gand Am GT 3100 v6 SFI"
Quote:
Quote:
^^^^
What's a "1995 Pontiac Gand Am GT 3100 v6 SFI"
One of my 5 vehicles..
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
^^^^
What's a "1995 Pontiac Gand Am GT 3100 v6 SFI"
One of my 5 vehicles..
I think he's referring to the fact that you spelled it Gand Am instead of Grand Am.
Quote:
I like Mobil 1. But, my wife's Ford likes the Motorcraft.
Bash Mobil 1 all you will. A giant like Mobil, I cannot foresee, lowering the quality of a product for which they've been the sales leader, by a LARGE margin for many years. There's just too much profit fot them to risk lowering their standards and loosing a bunch of customers.
Quote:
Quote:
I like Mobil 1. But, my wife's Ford likes the Motorcraft.
Bash Mobil 1 all you will. A giant like Mobil, I cannot foresee, lowering the quality of a product for which they've been the sales leader, by a LARGE margin for many years. There's just too much profit fot them to risk lowering their standards and loosing a bunch of customers.
You're forgetting one big thing though, Exxon took over Mobil 1, and they are more concerned about profits than anything else. And they also know that 99.9% of the people who buy Mobil 1 right now will continue to buy it and won't have a clue about the technical differences in the newest stuff compared to previous stuff. How many Mobil 1 buyers are going to get oil analysis done? Not many at all, and Exxon knows this. So they realize that they will continue to sell huge quantities of Mobil 1 based on past reputation. So in order to make even more money than before, they lower their costs on making the product. This means a lesser quality Mobil 1. Those of us on BITOG know this, but most of the motoring public has no clue. It's just like Fram oil filters. They once were good, now they use cheap materials, but most of the people who change their own oil use Fram filters, and these people truly believe Fram is the best. Good advertising and past reputation can do miracles.
Quote:
1949 Dodge Pickup: 43,000 actual miles: Mobil 1 10W-40
1951 Plymouth: 79,000 actual miles: Mobil 1 15W-50
1996 V-6 Camry: 182,000 miles: Mobil 1 10W-30
2001 V-6 Mustang: 76,000 miles: Motorcraft 5W-20
2003 V8 Tundra 4WD 72,000 miles: Delvac 1 5W-40
I like Mobil 1. But, my wife's Ford likes the Motorcraft.
Bash Mobil 1 all you will. A giant like Mobil, I cannot foresee, lowering the quality of a product for which they've been the sales leader, by a LARGE margin for many years.
Quote:
There's just too much profit fot them to risk lowering their standards and loosing a bunch of customers.
Quote:
There seem to be a lot of very good UOAs running various Mobil 1 formulas in Toyotas:
http://theoildrop.server101.com/forums/s...part=1&vc=1
http://theoildrop.server101.com/forums/s...true#Post804168
Quote:
Yes, but no better than with many other oils, including PP, blends, and dinos, for less than half the price.
Quote:
Quote:
Yes, but no better than with many other oils, including PP, blends, and dinos, for less than half the price.
If you chose a synthetic for a reason, like performance at temperature extremes, blends and dinos aren't close substitutes. If you don't need a synthetic, discussion of synthetics is moot.
Sticking with synthetics, a quick look at Amsoil, Valvoline, Quaker State, and Pennzoil in the Used Oil analyses with Toyota engines doesn't show any with performance superior to the Mobil 1 formulas.
So, if you need a synthetic and drive a Toyota, the Mobil 1 line looks like it's worth considering if it's available in your area at a competitive price.
Quote:
But does M1 show to be superior than any of those other oils you listed? Just because none of them show better than M1 does not mean that they are showing worse.