Originally Posted By: SteveSRT8
But you guys talk like everyone has these issues when they don't.
This is far from universal, GM has had the 3.6 DI motor out since May of 06, and they do not have any issues with valves carboning up excessively. Neither do many other engines with DI.
The most ridiculous assumption is the one that somehow concludes that the extra injector is the sole reason the 350 does not have carbon issues. Data please, or something other than just a guess or a Toyota commercial...
I don't mean to talk like everyone has the issue, I simply know that many/some/whatever have the issue. I personally have a car with a DI engine that has suffered no meaningful decrease of performance or efficiency over its lifetime.
For those of us who aren't engineers who don't have access to testing data performed in Toyota's labs, the best anyone can do is say what Jimzz just said. The IS-250 has the carbon problem and the IS-350 doesn't. I'm sure there are more differences between the two engines than the number and position of fuel injectors, but it's close enough that it is reasonable to think that the injector throwing fuel in before the valves is having an effect.
As far as GM goes.... maybe they figured it all out and using a port fuel injector is a Band-Aid that can cure the issue in certain engines. I honestly have no idea, because I don't know what's different about their system compared to others.
But you guys talk like everyone has these issues when they don't.
This is far from universal, GM has had the 3.6 DI motor out since May of 06, and they do not have any issues with valves carboning up excessively. Neither do many other engines with DI.
The most ridiculous assumption is the one that somehow concludes that the extra injector is the sole reason the 350 does not have carbon issues. Data please, or something other than just a guess or a Toyota commercial...
I don't mean to talk like everyone has the issue, I simply know that many/some/whatever have the issue. I personally have a car with a DI engine that has suffered no meaningful decrease of performance or efficiency over its lifetime.
For those of us who aren't engineers who don't have access to testing data performed in Toyota's labs, the best anyone can do is say what Jimzz just said. The IS-250 has the carbon problem and the IS-350 doesn't. I'm sure there are more differences between the two engines than the number and position of fuel injectors, but it's close enough that it is reasonable to think that the injector throwing fuel in before the valves is having an effect.
As far as GM goes.... maybe they figured it all out and using a port fuel injector is a Band-Aid that can cure the issue in certain engines. I honestly have no idea, because I don't know what's different about their system compared to others.