Nearly 200K on my '99 Subie. Solid as a tractor. Yeah, the HG issue was ("is" if you have a older version that has not had the repair) an issue, but there are cases of 300K+ on their original HG. However, I know of a few folks with Honda that had HG failures AND transmission failures. Still, assuming a '14 Subie is like a '00 Subie is the same problem as comparing '14/'00 Honda/Toyota... the modern Honda will (hopefully) not have the Tranny Issue and I do not think the modern Toyotas are as well built as my '01 MR2. If the designs are the same, then work with that but current models are different from the HG prone EJ25. Heck, look at the EJ22 (2.2l) and those things are unkillable. I still see folks with EJ25 searching for old EJ22.
Currently, I feel Honda (and the Mrs has a Fit) has been cutting a lot of corners in the "new economy". Toyota as well, but not in their engineering (they are doing it in their non-hybrid R&D and using dated but proven designs). Worse, it seems Toyota is ignore safety "issues" as they are not correcting KNOWN problem areas in new models. Subaru has the feel that they are not cutting corners... unless you consider framed windows a cut-corner. They are building thing properly.
So, back to Subie. Consider this: They were the only car manufacturer to GROW during the recession. They stayed in the black. Why? Solid product with a solid customer base. If you are going to buy a Subie, you are buying a Subie. Although they are drifting into the popular market more with more "normal" offerings, they are still with their roots. Actually, current Subies seem like early 90s Honda/Toyotas when proper engineering was more important than profit margins.
If I was looking for a vehicle (without a 911 label) #1 Would be Subie (and this is from a person who owns Subie, Honda, and Toyota (and formally "Datsun" too). My #2 would be Mazda. #3 Toyota depending on the model and #4 Honda depending on the model.