Originally Posted By: George Bynum
Capri didn't address it here, but I am of the opinion that the revolutions per mile are relatively constant as the tire wears ... the steel belt is the PRIMARY determining factor if reasonably loaded. VERY lightly loaded ... tire (including rubber) circumference. Normally loaded, belt circumference. Capri, another lesson please?
I'm trying to find a reliable source, because like you, I think there isn't much difference in rolling diameter new to worn.
On the other hand, ABS systems have been used to determine differences in inflation pressure, so I wonder about the degree to which there are differences. But without data, I'm staying away from comments on this subject.
Note: There's a part of me that is concerned about folks making these assertions without good documented data.
Capri didn't address it here, but I am of the opinion that the revolutions per mile are relatively constant as the tire wears ... the steel belt is the PRIMARY determining factor if reasonably loaded. VERY lightly loaded ... tire (including rubber) circumference. Normally loaded, belt circumference. Capri, another lesson please?
I'm trying to find a reliable source, because like you, I think there isn't much difference in rolling diameter new to worn.
On the other hand, ABS systems have been used to determine differences in inflation pressure, so I wonder about the degree to which there are differences. But without data, I'm staying away from comments on this subject.
Note: There's a part of me that is concerned about folks making these assertions without good documented data.