Recent Topics
newer tire in the back arguement
by 08sienna
04/20/14 09:24 PM
'98 Toyota Avalon - Glove Box blub fitment problem
by mercuryblues
04/20/14 08:44 PM
Lead and Crime
by Sam2000
04/20/14 07:49 PM
2015 Outback - Subaru drops the MT and AT
by buster
04/20/14 07:46 PM
PL14477 Autopsy
by earlyre
04/20/14 07:35 PM
1995 Buick Roadmaster's upcoming 60K mile service
by 10WSmuckers
04/20/14 07:23 PM
what does mopar code C1041 mean?
by SLATRON
04/20/14 06:40 PM
Stens 120-345 cut open
by DSparks
04/20/14 06:35 PM
What is replacing the General Altimax HP?
by tommygunn
04/20/14 06:33 PM
Reputable info on minivans??
by JHZR2
04/20/14 06:03 PM
weekend project / whats it worth? Honda HRT216KSDA
by volk06
04/20/14 05:53 PM
Wash and wax on M3
by domer10
04/20/14 05:38 PM
Newest Members
Delta, bnd, hammere30, SpartanSoul, jriordanzoom
49642 Registered Users
Who's Online
141 registered (1345, 08sienna, 74DartSport, 123Saab, 10WSmuckers, 06AllAmerican, 12 invisible), 1911 Guests and 170 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Stats
49642 Members
64 Forums
212181 Topics
3325724 Posts

Max Online: 2605 @ 04/19/14 12:41 PM
Donate to BITOG

Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 >
Topic Options
#2258202 - 05/11/11 07:34 PM Mobil 1 5W-30 EP, SN Rated with TBN and TAN
btanchors Offline


Registered: 04/10/04
Posts: 540
Loc: Herndon, VA
Here's a VOA of another Mobil 1 SN rated product - this time it's Mobil 1 5W-30 EP SN. Note that the additive package has changed, but very similar to Mobil 1 0W-20 SN, in that it uses a combination of Calcium and Magnesium for detergent additives. I am also shocked at the high TAN! TBN also lower than previous Mobil 1 5W-30 EP. For comparison purposes, see the link to the recent Mobil 1 0W-20 SN here. Enjoy!


Top
#2258215 - 05/11/11 07:40 PM Re: Mobil 1 5W-30 EP, SN Rated with TBN and TAN [Re: btanchors]
buster Offline


Registered: 11/16/02
Posts: 28965
Loc: NJ
Thanks for sharing this. Confirms the 0w20 was right. I'll be curious to see what Ultra and Amsoil look like. Using more Mg and less Calcium reduces the sulfated ash per Tbn level.


Top
#2258241 - 05/11/11 08:09 PM Re: Mobil 1 5W-30 EP, SN Rated with TBN and TAN [Re: btanchors]
Artem Offline


Registered: 10/30/10
Posts: 4300
Loc: Florida
^I'm getting ready to send off a Virgin sample of Amsoil's new AZO 0w30

Anyone know if there's a VOA of SSO using B_S labs?

BTW, thanks for posting the report, btanchors.
_________________________
2011 Toyota Avalon Limited 3.5L V6 - 45k - 5w30 Mobil 1

06 Scion tC 112k - 5w30 Valvoline NextGen

2014 Mazda 3 hatch i Touring 6spd - Mobil 1 0w30

Top
#2258343 - 05/11/11 09:26 PM Re: Mobil 1 5W-30 EP, SN Rated with TBN and TAN [Re: btanchors]
JasonBraswell Offline


Registered: 07/24/10
Posts: 122
Loc: Mckinney, TX
Man I sure do not understand what all this hype about the "SN" oil is all about. Every VOA seems to show less additives, which seems like we are being sold less robust oil. Can somebody explain this confusion?


*I'm glad I have a 5qt jug of fresh "SM" EP in my garage.
_________________________
99 Toyota LandCruiser OEM Filter(90915-20004) M1 HM 5w-30
06 Lexus LS 430 OEM Filter(90915-20004) M1 AFE 0w-30

Top
#2258476 - 05/12/11 12:31 AM Re: Mobil 1 5W-30 EP, SN Rated with TBN and TAN [Re: btanchors]
ltslimjim Offline


Registered: 08/06/10
Posts: 5143
Loc: PL&F
I tend to wonder too, if the product quality drops enough after UOAs and wear metal comparisons etc. I hope Amsoil's SSO lineup didn't nose dive. Get that VOA back please, Artem! :thumbsups: grin2

drive
_________________________
1992 Civic VX 275k+
HG replaced, waiting to sample

Top
#2258524 - 05/12/11 03:35 AM Re: Mobil 1 5W-30 EP, SN Rated with TBN and TAN [Re: btanchors]
gib Offline


Registered: 10/11/09
Posts: 160
Loc: A Tropical Isle
Huh. Kind of surprising to see a member of the EP product line have a TBN under 10. We'll see how it performs in extended use soon enough, hopefully.

Thanks for having this VOA done!

Top
#2258683 - 05/12/11 09:04 AM Re: Mobil 1 5W-30 EP, SN Rated with TBN and TAN [Re: btanchors]
addyguy Offline


Registered: 09/08/05
Posts: 13419
Loc: Canada
Its very, very simple what is happening.

Mg is a lot less expensive as a detergent than Ca-based detergents. Makes the add-pack less expensive.

As long as you have a TBN above 9, most oils will do 10-12k with ease - they assume once you get into the 14-15k range, you've had to top-off some oil, and refresh it.

Thanks for posting this!
_________________________
2003 Mazda Tribute LX V-6, 162K miles.
Oil: Edge SPT, PP, and Lucas syn; MPH2 filter.

Top
#2258782 - 05/12/11 11:19 AM Re: Mobil 1 5W-30 EP, SN Rated with TBN and TAN [Re: btanchors]
buster Offline


Registered: 11/16/02
Posts: 28965
Loc: NJ
I don't think it's that simple. They are reducing the SA. Mobil 1, like other advanced oils are a complex cocktail of many additives and base oils, many of which don't show up via VOA.

Top
#2258785 - 05/12/11 11:21 AM Re: Mobil 1 5W-30 EP, SN Rated with TBN and TAN [Re: btanchors]
buster Offline


Registered: 11/16/02
Posts: 28965
Loc: NJ
Cheapening is a poor word to use. I would suspect that these new formulations are better, not worse. Oils generally get better over time, not worse.

Top
#2258788 - 05/12/11 11:23 AM Re: Mobil 1 5W-30 EP, SN Rated with TBN and TAN [Re: btanchors]
buster Offline


Registered: 11/16/02
Posts: 28965
Loc: NJ
Time will tell if the TBN retention is up to par vs the initial higher TBN of years passed. Ca is on the way out.

Top
#2259613 - 05/13/11 01:11 AM Re: Mobil 1 5W-30 EP, SN Rated with TBN and TAN [Re: btanchors]
ltslimjim Offline


Registered: 08/06/10
Posts: 5143
Loc: PL&F
I agree with some of what addguy and buster are communicating...btw, by wear metals in reality I mean actual wear not necessarily what a UOA may/may not be 'indicating'.

I question and I ponder, but I still have general faith in the product lineups, but will scrutinize. Hopefully, this 'thing' that is being under review will get a better eye to review it. I'm still learning and it's still all guess work in a lot of areas anyway, at least from my end. laugh
_________________________
1992 Civic VX 275k+
HG replaced, waiting to sample

Top
#2260688 - 05/14/11 08:50 AM Re: Mobil 1 5W-30 EP, SN Rated with TBN and TAN [Re: btanchors]
buster Offline


Registered: 11/16/02
Posts: 28965
Loc: NJ
On paper, this oil obviously looks weak compared to past formulations, but additives change and improve. Many are just not showing up in these VOA's. Pennzoil and Amsoil are using 200ppm of boron and 3000ppm of calcium. That is an additive package that's been used for the last 5 years in many different oils. Assuming it's the same type of boron, which it may not be. Calcium probably is.

UOA's will be the judge.

Top
#2261011 - 05/14/11 03:43 PM Re: Mobil 1 5W-30 EP, SN Rated with TBN and TAN [Re: btanchors]
JasonBraswell Offline


Registered: 07/24/10
Posts: 122
Loc: Mckinney, TX
If you look at the new PDS M1 EP PDS , it's evident they are thinning out the oils to meet GF-5 fuel economy requirements with lower HTHS and viscosity. This oil is now thinner than the 0w-30.
Based on the UOA they are reducing additives also. Thinner oil with less additives seems to = a less quality oil, but I ain't no expert popcorn
_________________________
99 Toyota LandCruiser OEM Filter(90915-20004) M1 HM 5w-30
06 Lexus LS 430 OEM Filter(90915-20004) M1 AFE 0w-30

Top
#2261347 - 05/14/11 11:03 PM Re: Mobil 1 5W-30 EP, SN Rated with TBN and TAN [Re: btanchors]
tig1 Online   content


Registered: 01/03/09
Posts: 9492
Loc: Illinois
Have you noticed EP oils are still warranteed for 15K by XM? Outside of running the oil for 200K and more, there is no way of knowing how the oil will perform in the engine.
_________________________
2007 Ford Fusion 133,000 miles
M1 0-20
2007 Ford Focus 122,000 miles
M1 0-20
10,000 mile OCIs on both engines
M1 ATF
M1 10-30 in all OPE

Top
#2261993 - 05/15/11 06:43 PM Re: Mobil 1 5W-30 EP, SN Rated with TBN and TAN [Re: btanchors]
MolaKule Offline


Registered: 06/05/02
Posts: 13639
Loc: Midwest
Quote:
Man I sure do not understand what all this hype about the "SN" oil is all about. Every VOA seems to show less additives, which seems like we are being sold less robust oil. Can somebody explain this confusion?



There is more than "meets the eye" in these new formulations and robustness has nothing to do with the lack of metallic-based additives.

What you are NOT seeing, and as I predicted over two years ago, is that there are non-metallic, totally organic chemical compounds not being seen in these types of analyses that do the job of formerly all metallic additives.

Judge the quality by using at least three fills of the oil in question with at least three UOA's and get some trending data. Trending, not one snapshot, is what you need to see if the engine and oil are playing well together. And use no third-party additives during the trending or you will defeat the test with a third variable in which you have no idea how it affects the trending.


Edited by MolaKule (05/15/11 06:48 PM)
_________________________
Everyone needs a friend who is all ears. There's no such thing as too much candy. Keep your paws off of other people's jelly beans.

Top
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 >