Jeffs2006EvoIX
Thread starter
- Joined
- Feb 28, 2010
- Messages
- 1,663
Originally Posted By: hate2work
Originally Posted By: Ben99GT
Originally Posted By: Jeffs2006EvoIX
I think my friend/tuner was just taking into consideration the 26psi of boost getting jammed into my cylinders to why "he" feels that the 20/50 is needed. Stock Runs 21-22psi at WOT, mine is 26-27 at WOT.
But was he taking RL's HTHS viscosity into consideration?
I could be wrong, but I think this is simply a case of the friend/tuner being very set in his ways, and when someone tries something different, his immediate reaction is to scream "No way!"
I agree with you here. I did mention the HTHS of Redline and to be honest I don't think many tuners or even engine builders these days really understand what that means.
Allot of pride happens in the tuning world just like anywhere else. Im just trying to base my stuff on fact and not mythology that worked in the 60's. Cars have come a long way since then.
Originally Posted By: Ben99GT
Originally Posted By: Jeffs2006EvoIX
I think my friend/tuner was just taking into consideration the 26psi of boost getting jammed into my cylinders to why "he" feels that the 20/50 is needed. Stock Runs 21-22psi at WOT, mine is 26-27 at WOT.
But was he taking RL's HTHS viscosity into consideration?
I could be wrong, but I think this is simply a case of the friend/tuner being very set in his ways, and when someone tries something different, his immediate reaction is to scream "No way!"
I agree with you here. I did mention the HTHS of Redline and to be honest I don't think many tuners or even engine builders these days really understand what that means.
Allot of pride happens in the tuning world just like anywhere else. Im just trying to base my stuff on fact and not mythology that worked in the 60's. Cars have come a long way since then.