the 4.8 and 5.3 were good motors, but the 6.0 is on another level of dependability.Along with the 4.8 and the 5.3 definitely one of the best engines GM has ever made
the 4.8 and 5.3 were good motors, but the 6.0 is on another level of dependability.Along with the 4.8 and the 5.3 definitely one of the best engines GM has ever made
the 4.8 and 5.3 were good motors, but the 6.0 is on another level of dependability.
they may have many miles on them, but the 6.0 moves around 3/4 and 1 ton pickups plus their loads daily. there is a reason GM never put the aluminum block 6.2 in heavy duty pickups. the 6.0’s were made to be wound up and worked daily. the 4.8 and 5.3 are good motors and i’ve swapped quite a few into other vehicles. i’d much rather have a 4.8/5.3 than comparable dodge/ford offerings until the coyote.That’s debatable. My brother has some LS engines that have a lot of miles on them. He’s rebuilt a lot of 5.3’s that are still running around too. I wouldn’t go hog wild praising the 6.0 yet; you forget about the 6.2 that’s in Cadillac CTS V
they may have many miles on them, but the 6.0 moves around 3/4 and 1 ton pickups plus their loads daily. there is a reason GM never put the aluminum block 6.2 in heavy duty pickups. the 6.0’s were made to be wound up and worked daily. the 4.8 and 5.3 are good motors and i’ve swapped quite a few into other vehicles. i’d much rather have a 4.8/5.3 than comparable dodge/ford offerings until the coyote.
My BiL did 400k on a 5.3L - got rid of it bcs of trans - not motor!That’s debatable. My brother has some LS engines that have a lot of miles on them. He’s rebuilt a lot of 5.3’s that are still running around too. I wouldn’t go hog wild praising the 6.0 yet; you forget about the 6.2 that’s in Cadillac CTS V