Originally Posted By: jpr
With SM, the required phosphorus levels are more specific, calling for 0.06% to 0.08%...
Redline does seem to run high phosporus levels of around 1350 to 1450 ppm, which likely disqualifies it.
That is the one I was specifically thinking about and as you said it would be enough by itself. Perhaps there are others but I really don't follow these specs closely. There was a day when these specs weren't an issue and Red Line still, I believe, did not participate in API approval. It is of course a niche product being sold to a small group of people and their cost argument does strike me as a reasonable and satisfactory explanation as to why.
I suppose I would also be curious to see how Red Line would perform in API tests. By the way where can one go to view the specific SM requirements?
With SM, the required phosphorus levels are more specific, calling for 0.06% to 0.08%...
Redline does seem to run high phosporus levels of around 1350 to 1450 ppm, which likely disqualifies it.
That is the one I was specifically thinking about and as you said it would be enough by itself. Perhaps there are others but I really don't follow these specs closely. There was a day when these specs weren't an issue and Red Line still, I believe, did not participate in API approval. It is of course a niche product being sold to a small group of people and their cost argument does strike me as a reasonable and satisfactory explanation as to why.
I suppose I would also be curious to see how Red Line would perform in API tests. By the way where can one go to view the specific SM requirements?