I wouldn't expect the NFL report to say Brady told anyone to do this...you ask yourself does the information meet the preponderance of evidence standard in civil cases. Many legal experts say it does whatever Brady, Kraft, Trump or anyone else says about it.
If McNally, the locker room attendant, called himself the "deflator" in the text messages, you can reasonably conclude that this was a known issue that they were reacting to and not decontextualized. The report supports this idea. Does Brady's agent want to release the full transcript of the interview?? H E L L No...but he'll be first to pipe up that the interview omits key parts that would help exonerate Brady.
The Patriots denied a second interview with McNally but seemed to be mostly cooperative other than the assigned pit bulls and Brady's understandable denial in access to his phone. My understanding is that the NFL investigator would've been happy with a call record and not content of the calls.
I'm assuming it's viewed as circumstantial by the Patriots that Jastremski, the equipment asst., mentioned talking to Brady the previous night saying that he knew McNally was stressed out about needing to deflate the balls. Yep, "sting", "witch hunt", "preposterous"...all the words have been used by the guilty many times before. It's not about guilt though...it's more about what kind of apologist and bad logician you are versus what actually happened. "Patriots won 45-7 so does any cheating really matter??"...or "Hey, Tom played better the second half with fully inflated balls so what are you crying about??...they would've won anyway." The "if I don't caught it's OK" mentality.
I tend to believe retired Hall of Famers who've piped up on this issue and not Brady's agent or Robert Kraft. It must hurt Brady that Joe Montana ( his old idol ) doesn't see things the way Tom does. It doesn't help the cause that Brady would not be a particularly good liar whether he's ultimately telling the truth that he didn't know or not.