Recent Topics
MMO for GDI Engines ?
by ChrisD46
Today at 03:53 AM
38" Riding Mower, idler spring/pulley bad?
by Crispysea
Today at 03:11 AM
Is Aerospace 303 still for
by MetalSlug
Today at 03:03 AM
Shell AV-L ECT C2C3 0w30 vs Ravenol SSO 0w30
by Janusz
Today at 03:01 AM
Havoline PSF $22.92 / 12 Pack @ Amazon.com
by Farmer
Today at 12:59 AM
2015 Silverado Valance Trim
by Realtech214
Yesterday at 10:58 PM
Motorcycle Tire Direction question?
by maverickfhs
Yesterday at 10:02 PM
Worried when I leave home..
by Chris142
Yesterday at 09:38 PM
FYI AC Delco Dexron 6
by WyrTwister
Yesterday at 07:56 PM
Jeep Compass?
by ford46guy
Yesterday at 07:52 PM
oil for 2009 Volvo XC 70 32
by foresthawk
Yesterday at 07:39 PM
Help me pick atf, transfer case, and diff fluid
by Randy_270
Yesterday at 07:30 PM
Best brakes
by M1Accord
Yesterday at 07:11 PM
SSA death benefit question
by 04SE
Yesterday at 07:00 PM
What type of oil comes in a 2017 Silverado ?
by mtlineman
Yesterday at 05:38 PM
2016 FLTRU Amsoil MCV 20W50, 5229 miles
by nocarb
Yesterday at 05:31 PM
Pennzoil HM Oil At WM
by BlueOvalFitter
Yesterday at 05:18 PM
Sorry for beating a dead horse concerning BC 0w40!
by MichaelDCRogers
Yesterday at 05:15 PM
FOG vs Driving lights
by Eddie
Yesterday at 04:36 PM
Cell Phone for a Trip
by sleddriver
Yesterday at 04:21 PM
Newest Members
Wolfie, JR96, apollo18, CarsSimplified, Garretts77
62925 Registered Users
Who's Online
21 registered (bugeye, Bookmaker, Cujet, 4WD, Bandito440, 4 invisible), 1032 Guests and 14 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Stats
62925 Members
66 Forums
271290 Topics
4499580 Posts

Max Online: 3590 @ 01/24/17 08:07 PM
Donate to BITOG
Page 2 of 4 < 1 2 3 4 >
Topic Options
#3422771 - 07/12/14 04:00 PM Re: Ecoboost or Not. [Re: tangojetta]
itguy08 Offline


Registered: 09/15/11
Posts: 2879
Loc: Somewhere
Love both of mine.

One has been since new and 76k later nothing out of a knock sensor for the engine. Lots of power, decent fuel economy (for a 4500LB AWD sedan), and no oil consumption, turbo, or other issues with it. I fill it up with the cheapest swill I can find, change the oil at the dealer when the OLM either comes on or gets close. I did change the plugs at 75k and that's it.

The truck, got it with 43k in January, it now has 49k and no oil consumption or anything. But not really much other than that as far as history.

I fully expect at least 200k out of them both without major repairs.

I wouldn't worry - Ford has put out well over 600k of them since the middle of 2009 and failures are few and far between. I'm more worried about the 6F55 in the SHO than the Ecoboost. Although it too has given me no issues and I change the fluid every 30k.


Edited by itguy08 (07/12/14 04:02 PM)

Top
#3422778 - 07/12/14 04:13 PM Re: Ecoboost or Not. [Re: tangojetta]
TiredTrucker Offline


Registered: 01/04/08
Posts: 3157
Loc: Central Iowa
We are in the 21st century and it seems ridiculous that something like the ecoboost is out of the norm and we are still playing with naturally aspirated engines. Just about everything at this point should be turbo or supercharged. Naturally aspirated diesels in vehicles are so old school and not even offered in new stuff, just not sure why gasoline hasn't gone the same route. N/A engines should be confined to kit mods, restorations, and museums. Sure the cost would be more, but in mass production the costs drop dramatically compared to aftermarket.
_________________________
Freedom is not about having the choice to do what you want, but the choice to do what you ought.

Top
#3422792 - 07/12/14 04:30 PM Re: Ecoboost or Not. [Re: tangojetta]
Nick R Offline


Registered: 07/14/09
Posts: 11133
Loc: Albany, NY
I would have no issues with an ecoboost vehicle. Some people are luddites and afraid of change. I'm not. We almost got a Ford f-150 ecoboost when I got my focus. We ended up with the traverse instead and have been very happy with it. But if you want an engine with lots of torque, and decent fuel economy, and a lot of go power, you can't really go wrong imo.
_________________________
2013 Ford Focus SE 2.0L/85,000miles/Valvoline Synpower 0W-20/MC FL400S

Top
#3423238 - 07/13/14 01:44 AM Re: Ecoboost or Not. [Re: tangojetta]
dave1251 Offline


Registered: 07/15/05
Posts: 8395
Loc: Maricopa, AZ
This guy is trolling for some cash. Rubes believe anything.
_________________________
make the inside of your engine oil cap white.
don't use.

Top
#3423255 - 07/13/14 05:03 AM Re: Ecoboost or Not. [Re: tangojetta]
demarpaint Offline


Registered: 07/03/05
Posts: 28131
Loc: NY
I'm hearing mixed reviews about the EB engines. I'm still not ready to gamble with one, and I'm a big FMC fan. In another year or two I'd consider one. Fortunately for me, I want a new vehicle I don't need one.
_________________________
God Bless Our Troops


Top
#3423447 - 07/13/14 11:50 AM Re: Ecoboost or Not. [Re: demarpaint]
SteveSRT8 Offline


Registered: 10/10/08
Posts: 18538
Loc: Sunny Florida
Originally Posted By: demarpaint
I'm hearing mixed reviews about the EB engines. I'm still not ready to gamble with one, and I'm a big FMC fan. In another year or two I'd consider one. Fortunately for me, I want a new vehicle I don't need one.


Major mfgrs have used us as the guinea pigs for a long time now, we always should thank the early adopters! But the EB is already pretty much proven viable, it just has some glitches under particular duty cycles. The failure rate on the V6 is quite low and it's only the 4 bangers that have had some issues, we all know about the old V6 intercooler woes, that's all over now.

It's always nice to let that new tech be thoroughly tested before spending your hard earned money...
_________________________
"In a democracy, dissent is an act of faith."
J. William Fulbright
Best ET-12.79 @ 111 mph
4340 pounds, Street tires
Just like we go to Publix

Top
#3423595 - 07/13/14 03:36 PM Re: Ecoboost or Not. [Re: demarpaint]
itguy08 Offline


Registered: 09/15/11
Posts: 2879
Loc: Somewhere
Originally Posted By: demarpaint
I'm hearing mixed reviews about the EB engines.


Just curious what? The 3.5 is solid with the exception it likes plugs every 40-50k or so. The F150 had intercooler issues but those are pretty much over now.

I know people complain about the fuel economy but that's about to be expected. Drive it hard and it's about the same as a 7.0 liter engine. Drive it sanely and you will get decent economy. I've seen 26 MPG in long highway with the SHO and with the F150 the average is about 17 (it has max tow, 4x4, and 3.73's). The SHO is fine by me and the F150 is about to be expected with the gearing it has.

Top
#3423890 - 07/13/14 09:13 PM Re: Ecoboost or Not. [Re: itguy08]
klt1986 Offline


Registered: 04/08/09
Posts: 212
Loc: Southern VA
Originally Posted By: itguy08
Originally Posted By: demarpaint
I'm hearing mixed reviews about the EB engines.


Just curious what? The 3.5 is solid with the exception it likes plugs every 40-50k or so. The F150 had intercooler issues but those are pretty much over now.

I know people complain about the fuel economy but that's about to be expected. Drive it hard and it's about the same as a 7.0 liter engine. Drive it sanely and you will get decent economy. I've seen 26 MPG in long highway with the SHO and with the F150 the average is about 17 (it has max tow, 4x4, and 3.73's). The SHO is fine by me and the F150 is about to be expected with the gearing it has.



Major oil consumption/smoking issues in the Interceptors here locally. Also transmission and rear end issues as well. One Interceptor was down for over 30 days awaiting a new rear end from Ford. There were not any parts available...whatever happened Ford wanted the rear end replaced as a unit.

I love the power the EB engine makes in these cars...the performance really is light years ahead of the Crown Vic PI's. However, long term durability under severe service may be an issue for this engine.



Edited by klt1986 (07/13/14 09:15 PM)

Top
#3424003 - 07/13/14 11:27 PM Re: Ecoboost or Not. [Re: klt1986]
ukmastermind Offline


Registered: 08/07/12
Posts: 111
Loc: Los Angeles, CA
I'm going to start collecting Walnut Shells just in case my buddies EB engine clogs up!
Walnut Shells and Dirty Intake Valves

Top
#3424062 - 07/14/14 05:05 AM Re: Ecoboost or Not. [Re: klt1986]
SteveSRT8 Offline


Registered: 10/10/08
Posts: 18538
Loc: Sunny Florida
Originally Posted By: klt1986
However, long term durability under severe service may be an issue for this engine.


I think that is precisely why Demarpaint and I agree that these get a little more R&D from those brave 'early adopters'!
_________________________
"In a democracy, dissent is an act of faith."
J. William Fulbright
Best ET-12.79 @ 111 mph
4340 pounds, Street tires
Just like we go to Publix

Top
#3424074 - 07/14/14 05:57 AM Re: Ecoboost or Not. [Re: tangojetta]
demarpaint Offline


Registered: 07/03/05
Posts: 28131
Loc: NY
Originally Posted By: itguy08
Originally Posted By: demarpaint
I'm hearing mixed reviews about the EB engines.


Just curious what?


Pretty much what was already mentioned in this thread.
_________________________
God Bless Our Troops


Top
#3424119 - 07/14/14 07:23 AM Re: Ecoboost or Not. [Re: klt1986]
itguy08 Offline


Registered: 09/15/11
Posts: 2879
Loc: Somewhere
Originally Posted By: klt1986

Major oil consumption/smoking issues in the Interceptors here locally. Also transmission and rear end issues as well. One Interceptor was down for over 30 days awaiting a new rear end from Ford. There were not any parts available...whatever happened Ford wanted the rear end replaced as a unit.

I love the power the EB engine makes in these cars...the performance really is light years ahead of the Crown Vic PI's. However, long term durability under severe service may be an issue for this engine.


Thanks.

There is a new TSB out and new parts for the smoking issue. And it goes all the way back to the 2010 EB in the cars so that may be something that was bad design.

I've heard that the rear in that platform (SHO/Flex/Explorer) is an integrated unit with the clutches and such built into the rear so that may be why it needs to be replaced as a unit rather than a rebuild. Either way I don't think I'd classify a rear end or even transmission a fault with the engine.

I would have hoped that with the Law Enforcement contracts, Ford would have done tons of testing on them but it seems like something slipped through the cracks. They better get it sorted or risk loosing LOTS of sales!

Top
#3424129 - 07/14/14 07:33 AM Re: Ecoboost or Not. [Re: ukmastermind]
badtlc Offline


Registered: 06/08/06
Posts: 5104
Loc: KC
Originally Posted By: ukmastermind
I'm going to start collecting Walnut Shells just in case my buddies EB engine clogs up!
Walnut Shells and Dirty Intake Valves


If your friend's EB clogs up then he isn't getting it hot enough every now and then:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BFfRcwesqNg
_________________________
2007 Ford Escape XLS 2.3L ATX, Formula Shell 5W30, Fram TG, 155k+
2015 Chrysler T&C, 60k+, PP 5w30, Fram OF

Top
#3424143 - 07/14/14 07:44 AM Re: Ecoboost or Not. [Re: tangojetta]
Miller88 Offline


Registered: 04/09/08
Posts: 12195
Loc: Onondaga County
I reallllllly want to put a catch can on my parents Escape. I may end up doing it once its out of warranty.
_________________________
I don't have nice things for a reason

Top
#3424150 - 07/14/14 07:55 AM Re: Ecoboost or Not. [Re: Miller88]
demarpaint Offline


Registered: 07/03/05
Posts: 28131
Loc: NY
Originally Posted By: Miller88
I reallllllly want to put a catch can on my parents Escape. I may end up doing it once its out of warranty.


I'd put it on now, and take it off if there's a problem while its under warranty and has to go in for service. That is unless they bring it to the dealer for service, something I don't do. My thinking is if the catch can is going to be of any benefit long term, why wait until the warranty is up? Just thinking out loud.
_________________________
God Bless Our Troops


Top
Page 2 of 4 < 1 2 3 4 >