Hello, My friend's son needed to sell his 2000 Luxury SUV w/170K. A good riding, big cruiser with matched tires, unripped leather, rear A/C controls and the merest beginnings of rust.
I offered to place ads online. I snapped pictures of it and was diligent to include clear photos of the vehicle's body damage. I photographed the bad side from the same angle as the good side.
After posting the ads I chatted with my friend and he mentioned that his son would prefer not to have the buyer too near by as the vehicle has a recurring EVAP related CEL. This came as news.
The lad called this evening to tell me he sold the car. I asked him about the CEL and he said it didn't come back on during the 60 mile drive to the new owner's home. He added that the new owner has a brother who's a service manager in a local dealership/garage. He also added that when he got home tonight the new owner called to mention the CEL had come on. The kid claimed ignorance. He lied.
Hmmm.....Do I tell Santa? I suggested he keep some bandages and anti-septic on hand because the new owner might come by and say 'Hi'.
It's bugging me a bit. Nice kid otherwise. The vehicle was SUPER fairly priced. The body damage wasn't that bad at all. The buyer obviously wanted this particular vehicle. It is in otherwise very good condition. The buyer has access to extremely easy repair scenarios......but the kid did lie about it-even to me to a degree.
Am I a childish dreamer? Is the kid merely realistic? Does offering a vehicle at a near give away price create license to lie by omission? The buyer did snap up a value priced vehicle. Is a extremely serviceable vehicle in otherwise great shape good enough to overlook this transgression? Should the buyer have been suspicious of the low, low price?
What do you think? Darn it. Kira
I offered to place ads online. I snapped pictures of it and was diligent to include clear photos of the vehicle's body damage. I photographed the bad side from the same angle as the good side.
After posting the ads I chatted with my friend and he mentioned that his son would prefer not to have the buyer too near by as the vehicle has a recurring EVAP related CEL. This came as news.
The lad called this evening to tell me he sold the car. I asked him about the CEL and he said it didn't come back on during the 60 mile drive to the new owner's home. He added that the new owner has a brother who's a service manager in a local dealership/garage. He also added that when he got home tonight the new owner called to mention the CEL had come on. The kid claimed ignorance. He lied.
Hmmm.....Do I tell Santa? I suggested he keep some bandages and anti-septic on hand because the new owner might come by and say 'Hi'.
It's bugging me a bit. Nice kid otherwise. The vehicle was SUPER fairly priced. The body damage wasn't that bad at all. The buyer obviously wanted this particular vehicle. It is in otherwise very good condition. The buyer has access to extremely easy repair scenarios......but the kid did lie about it-even to me to a degree.
Am I a childish dreamer? Is the kid merely realistic? Does offering a vehicle at a near give away price create license to lie by omission? The buyer did snap up a value priced vehicle. Is a extremely serviceable vehicle in otherwise great shape good enough to overlook this transgression? Should the buyer have been suspicious of the low, low price?
What do you think? Darn it. Kira