1WPY-14-302 made in Thailand for the Turbo engines.
PE01-14-302A MV made in Mexico for the NA engines.
Not so. the 1WPY-14-302 is the turbo filter. That's what the dealer's part computer shows. BTDT. Both filters are 'genuine' Mazda filters. Parts guy grabbed the 1WPE filter, I objected saying I had the turbo engine. He then looked it up and sold me the 1WPY filter. The two filters are visually identical. Check with your dealer.I use either the Mazda Genuine or an XG-6607.
NOTE: Mazda markets 2 oil filters for this engine. The Mazda Genuine is the 'better' of the two. The other is their 'value line' and is a lower price and lighter- or otherwise 'lesser'-constructed filter. I don't recall the part number of the value line filter, though I've been given it by mistake before. The 1WPY-14-302 (as shown in the video linked above) is the Mazda Genuine part for the naturally-aspirated SkyActive 2.5L engine (in North America, anyway).
That is not correct. The 1WPY-14-302 is the filter for the naturally-aspirated 2.5L SkyActive engine. The other may or may not be for the turbo version, or it may be model-specific for the CX-30, or I _think_ it's simply the Mazda 'value line' filter. IDK.
Not so. the 1WPY-14-302 is the turbo filter. That's what the dealer's part computer shows. BTDT. Both filters are 'genuine' Mazda filters. Parts guy grabbed the 1WPE filter, I objected saying I had the turbo engine. He then looked it up and sold me the 1WPY filter. The two filters are visually identical. Check with your dealer.
My 2¢
Not so. the 1WPY-14-302 is the turbo filter. That's what the dealer's part computer shows. BTDT. Both filters are 'genuine' Mazda filters. Parts guy grabbed the 1WPE filter, I objected saying I had the turbo engine. He then looked it up and sold me the 1WPY filter. The two filters are visually identical. Check with your dealer.
My 2¢
Maybe, but we have nothing to go on as Mazda doesn't list specs.What the difference between the filters, bypass valve pressure ?
I like Mazda, I genuinely haven't heard any actual reliability issues regarding the Skyactiv motors or transmissions once they completely ditched the Ford platforms in 2014has anyone ever had a problem with the 2.5L mazda engine? They seem to be one of the most reliable engines ever.....so my answer would be any oil filter would probably do ok
There might still be oil in the filter, but could be that some oil in the galleries above the filter could drain down. The ADBV doesn't cause enough flow resistance to even measure without a million dollar test lab.The approved filters don't have an anti-drainback valve, but the filter hangs down, and is so always filled. Non-approved filters of the same spec have anti-drainback valves, but I can't see where any slight restriction from an ADV would cause any problem.
Not sure the basis for the term "identical", but the baseplates are not the same for both. The 51356 used to be the spec Wix filter 'for Hondas', but years ago Wix changed the baseplate geometry for the newer 57356 and made it the Honda spec filter, superseding the former. The reason for change given by Wix, improved engine block OF engagement....Further research led me to a Wix 57356 (now identical to Wix 51356)........
Yes, CX5 would be on my wife’s short list to replace the current 2012, nice SUVWell Just bought a new 2022 Mazda CX5 going to be awhile yet but its looking like the first OCI I do will be with a Fram TG6607. My guess is the first change will occur in September or October!
Filters advertised as 5k intervals is generally terminology used to upsell a “premium” filter.I should note that the MicroGard MGL57002 also doesn't have an ADBV, but it specifically states that it should be used for 5k intervals. It is made in Mexico and I think it is the Wix / NAPA ProSelect / SIlver equivalent.
All good, except the Wix 57002 filter has a 15 micron rating, while the Wix 51356 and Wix 51334 are both 21 micron ratings.I have a 2021 CX-5. Same 2.5 Skyactive engine.
FWIW.
Interesting note on approved/Wix 57002 filters: I cut open several different filters, and found the following. The factory filter has, by my reasonably accurate measurements, 685 cm2/106 in2. The super duper special made Wix 57002 has only 320 cm2/49.6 in2. The nominal filtering spec is 15 microns, which sounds pretty efficient. However, with less than HALF the area of the factory filter, the oil must be going through it like a fire hose, and I wonder how much dirt is actually caught, and how much oil is bypassed before it is fully hot.
Further research led me to a Wix 57356 (now identical to Wix 51356). I measured and found 751 cm2/116 in2. Even better than the factory filter! This filter will remain on my short list. It was well made, with a Beta of 2/6 and 20/20. ( Wix uses weird nomenclature of 2/20=6/20)
Other possibilities with the right relief pressure are a Wix 51334/Fram UG3593a which should have even more filter area.
The approved filters don't have an anti-drainback valve, but the filter hangs down, and is so always filled. Non-approved filters of the same spec have anti-drainback valves, but I can't see where any slight restriction from an ADV would cause any problem.
I now am approaching 11k miles, and have had a Fram UG7317 on it for the last 4500 miles. I tried the UG Fram after I saw really good results posted by a testing lab. I don't know how much filter area it has, or if I'll continue to use it.