Originally Posted by ABN_CBT_ENGR
Originally Posted by GMBoy
I agree, having been deeply involved in ISO etc with GM and working with our vendors. But just one metric - return % would be enough to judge parts makers but I doubt Autozone and other parts stores would give up that data to us to evaluate. Therefore, we are left with most opinions and hearing from people who got bad parts from XYZ none of the satisfied customers are commenting.
With that, I still say Cardone rebuilds are junk based on my sample of size of at least 100.
I respectfully disagree on that point based on my experience that a lot of these "returns" are called "defective" ( more as a face saver) , a misdiagnosis or other cause unrelated to the actual quality or function of the item in question. Those are not legitimate reflections on the respective vendor.
This also can be skewed by "failures" caused by abuse, improper installation or usage beyond design specifications too. ( not a reflection again on the rebuild or vendor)
I get real cautious about unqualified or single point data ( especially when its all a client can give me)
Yes, you bring up a very valid point. I agree.