I voted but with a two party system sometimes both (sides) are pathetic.Probably not voting. I hate having to participate in the charade of the existing duopoly. (ex, Look at Georgia senatorial candidates of Tweedledee and Tweedledum).
I voted but with a two party system sometimes both (sides) are pathetic.Probably not voting. I hate having to participate in the charade of the existing duopoly. (ex, Look at Georgia senatorial candidates of Tweedledee and Tweedledum).
I am hoping that it will not even be close....You better have enough for a whole week you'll know nothing tonight
One of your candidates is an angry man....I’d vote for the guy with the big smile and big heart.Ugh, can't decide. Which evil manipulative monkey-pandering hypocrite do I vote for.
Maybe it's just a GA thing. All our candidates supposedly ran over their wives with cars.
I’m usually voting against somebody rather than for somebody....term limits would solve a lot of our problems.In before the lock. Haven't voted since 2000 and no plans to ever do so again. No one good enough to vote for. Anyway...we always get the government that we deserve.
Voting for the lesser of two evils, you just can't win!I’m usually voting against somebody rather than for somebody....term limits would solve a lot of our problems.
Actually the act of voting validates the current system. Ask yourself why the the majority of the states do not have ranked choice voting? Why don't they require a minimum turnout for an election to be consider valid? Why insist on the duopoly (two-party system)?Well you’re going to get one or the other, maybe ask your successful neighbor and vote how they do?
Inaction is condoning the current conditions, no matter what situation you find yourself in.
Wonder what would happen if everyone stopped participating in this clown show?
Wasn’t there some clause about minimum voter participation or such?