We've been trained to think that way. The only reason things get outdated is because Google and Apple outdate them on purpose with unnecessary new Android and iPhone OS versions every year.In my experience by the time a cellphone battery is showing signs of weakness the phone is outdated anyway........Most don't keep tablets, smartphones, etc., long enough to change batteries multiple times.
we put a man on the moon over 50 years ago, they can find a way to not change much except a battery door.Not necessarily a good thing. This could make new phones thicker, clunkier, and less water proof.
I'm not for the government designing the phone, but having some simple requirements of repairability, reusability, recycleableness, and backwards compatibility of almost all consumer products makes sense on a lot of levels...Government doesnt dictate the design of products. I do understand your point but me personally will never agree to someone controlling my life. Doesnt mean it wont happen but I do not have to lay down and not be vocal. Either way, this is another country, not the USA though. I think one option and it very well may be, if the UK wants to force something why not give the public a choice? Meaning someone can buy a waterproof slim, stylish iPhone without a replaceable battery or another model with one. I can bet only a tiny minority would choose replaceable.
I hope the USA stays out of this and a company like Apple has the finances to offer two products as well as other companies. Let the USA lead with slim, waterproof devices and the UK live with government mandated design, oh sure that will work out great *LOL*
BTW- UL is a private testing company and not a requirement by US standards.
Is UL Approval Required On All Items Sold In The USA? | Mondoro
When looking at consumer and other electrical products sold in the United States, many people want to understand if UL approval is required for any items soldmondoro.com
I had a phone that wasn't 5G capable. The new phone I have is. The only thing "wrong" with the old phone was short battery life. The battery was replaceable by someone who knows what they were doing (watched a youtube video-decided it wasn't for me to try and replace) for $100.00-but it was "only 4G".' I don't buy $1,000.00 phones.We've been trained to think that way. The only reason things get outdated is because Google and Apple outdate them on purpose with unnecessary new Android and iPhone OS versions every year.
Microsoft kept Windows XP updated and secure for 13 years without outdating anything... and they could have went longer. The same could be done with phones and tablets, but that wouldn't sell nearly as many devices or make near the money.
These companies don't want you keeping $1000 phones more than a couple years... why would they? But I think there's a lot of consumers who would like that very much
Actually it's really just the tech minority that need and can afford the newest model every year. Most Americans try and hang on to their $1000 investments as long as possible. Have you heard about all the right to repair legal action going on in the US? Apple was forced to allow their devices to be fixed. John Deere's next. That's the new trend and it's just growing.I'm not for the government designing the phone, but having some simple requirements of repairability, reusability, recycleableness, and backwards compatibility of almost all consumer products makes sense on a lot of levels...
Apple and the others main goal is to drain your wallet, and the environment is something to mention in some sales materials and do near the minimum otherwise.
I know its the american way to get "the new model" as often as possible, but I think now the microprocessors speeds are plateauing and probably we could get into a phone becoming a 8-10 year item for the majority of users if there was support for them in that time frame.
But you dont have to buy an Apple product.I'm not for the government designing the phone, but having some simple requirements of repairability, reusability, recycleableness, and backwards compatibility of almost all consumer products makes sense on a lot of levels...
Apple and the others main goal is to drain your wallet, and the environment is something to mention in some sales materials and do near the minimum otherwise.
I know its the american way to get "the new model" as often as possible, but I think now the microprocessors speeds are plateauing and probably we could get into a phone becoming a 8-10-12 year item for the majority of users if there was support for them in that time frame.
I've got a 2nd gen iphone SE and it does all I need, but eventually apple will kill it off with an operating system upgrade that I don't care about for some new features on the iphone 15 or whatever...
Well, the wife says we are an apple phone house... I was arguing just going all android but she wears the phone tech hat, and I don't really care which phone I've got if it does what I need....But you dont have to buy an Apple product.
I replace phones every 2 to 3 years, never had a bad battery and much rather have a phone like my current iPhone 13 can be dropped into salt water up to 18 feet deep and not get damaged. Thank goodness we dont have these restrictions here. I'll take form, looks, function over replacing a battery anyday. Maybe the UK government should make their own phones with all those features. I am sure it will be a blockbuster... or not *LOL*
Why are you ranting about the UK? This law was passed by the EU. The UK is not a member of the European Union.I could care less, I don’t agree with a lot that goes on in the UK. People have choices. I don’t need government telling me when I must buy, they cannot even manage their own budget, which is always in the red....
Oops, Eu … and ranting??? OkWhy are you ranting about the UK? This law was passed by the EU. The UK is not a member of the European Union.
I have yet to read the law, but I've got to wonder about their definition of 'easily'. If it is like my old original Samsung Galaxy, then absolutely. Bet the manufacturers come up with some other stumbling block though. You're talking billions of dollars at stake if they can't sell a new phone every 2 years when batteries start to degrade.
IFixit dot com, has repair videos for Apple and Android cell phones and tablets to replace the battery and screens. It cost me $35 for the tools and battery to replace the battery in my Garmin GPS which cost me $400 back in 2011. I have lifetime maps so there was no way I was getting rid of it for a weak battery. 20 minutes to open it up install new battery and put it back together.
I just got my refurbished phone from Google this afternoon because the battery in my old phone committed suicide. Google only charged me $35, two days shipping both ways included, so it wasn't worth my time to replace the battery myself.
That is the only issue I have with these Smart phones, I wish the owner could just pop the back off and drop a new battery in when needed.
Except we had phones in the past that were slim and water proof. Galaxy S8 I think. I think Motorola and Nokia had few as well.Not necessarily a good thing. This could make new phones thicker, clunkier, and less water proof.
No, not the S8 that I know of, I just did a search and they show using a heat gun to get the back off. Also, water resistance of 4.5 feet compared to iPhone which is 18 feet is a huge difference.Except we had phones in the past that were slim and water proof. Galaxy S8 I think. I think Motorola and Nokia had few as well.
Must’ve been earlier then and back then iPhones didn’t have any water resistance rating at all. And they were “sealed”.No, not the S8 that I know of, I just did a search and they show using a heat gun to get the back off. Also, water resistance of 4.5 feet compared to iPhone which is 18 feet is a huge difference.
I think the key here is let the consumer decide. The public didnt care and why replaceable batteries left the market. It was features over replaceable battery.
I have a very old Garmin GPS from back when we were still using old style Flip phones, before sealed smartphones were even a wet dream. It takes 4 AA batteries, and it was designed and sold to be completely waterproof... and it was, I accidentally "tested" it lol. It was shown floating in a river on the package if I remember correctly.. which was exactly how I tested itMust’ve been earlier then and back then iPhones didn’t have any water resistance rating at all. And they were “sealed”.
The point is that having a removable battery doesn’t mean the phone cannot be water resistant.
What customers choose is another story, but when people automatically make excuses for the corporations without even knowing that it was done in the past, it gets quite annoying.
I have had this problem with several work phones (iPhone & Android)-seems the company’s multiple “nanny” programs were KILLING battery life, the phones would go through huge amounts of data, even got hot while operating! When they replaced the iPhones & iPads with Android devices, they let us keep/buy cheap the 5th Gen iPads & iPhone 8s we were using-took all their bloatware off, battery issues disappeared.My iPhone 12 max pro was having battery issues, so of course, I looked at the battery health, which said 85%, maximum performance. Seemed way off, as by 3PM, the phone was dead. So, YouTube to the rescue, I found the way to use an app to review the analytics file and read the actual battery capacity in MAh, and the number of cycles it has undergone.
The actual battery capacity worked out to about 80% of new capacity and just under 500 cycles if I remember correctly.
I then erased the phone and started again as a "new phone". Which solved the battery life problem.