The plan was contrived for him to fail….Fox provided the car and you could see the assistant riding along…
Your problem is that you're taking mature approach taking the nuances into consideration.
This will mean nothing to those who tout as fact what is no more than an example of a user taking a trip in a car he has zero knowledge of with no prior planning.
As the old saying goes, when you fail to plan you plan to fail.
Worked great for this TV personality.
You might be surprised...The vast majority of people are not interested in some learning curve, following some screen to find someplace to charge it on the road, they want to get in start it and drive it as far or short as they want and tank it when it needs it at one of the 160,000 gasoline stations. They also have no interest in plugging it in every night.
You might be surprised...
No he won’t.You might be surprised...
The primary anti EV members here will seize on anything to make them seem impractical and undesirable.That's the strangest comment I've seen given that almost everyone these days has a cell phone and knows why it makes sense to charge it every night. Of all the things to complain about EVs, why would charging it every night be something that would deter anyone?
On this I will say I have to blame the company. I have driven/owned a couple different PHEV's , since 2015, and after the a couple of charges OR if on a long trip, after 50-60 miles the GOM (guess O Meter) for the electric miles was very close. I have a few neighbors and friends that own Tesla's, and there is not a single one that can get close to 85% of the predicted range after a charge. But wait, Tesla is being sued for falsify range at or near a full change. Now, if you had a model Y on order you have to go back in the system and confirm that you will accept a lower range then what you thought you were getting online and both the S and X have had their ranges lowered, I wonder why?? OK, enough said and off my soapbox.Generally true, but reality has a way of chewing away at the range estimates. Especially when it is really cold.
I've found that I like to go fast. Anyone who has done a fast road trip in an EV knows you won't make the predicted supercharger.
Did a West Palm Beach to Miami and back road trip, 200 miles, in a Model S. BARELY made it back. Something like 4% remaining. Had to go stupidly slow when it became clear it was not possible at typical speeds.
To do my round trip properly, it would require careful speed management in the right lane.
Yes for now. Maybe not after 2035.There's room for all kinds of cars
I have a feeling they'll be tweaking that to 2050, maybe beyond.Yes for now. Maybe not after 2035.
The primary anti EV members here will seize on anything to make them seem impractical and undesirable.
Most of us can use our cognitive skills to look beyond this.
You're better than this. What happened?pretty well said, the video are recorded facts about a electric vehicle car trip. The discussion that follows are people making excuses for the facts and trying to discredit them but you can’t discredit facts
I guess you are reading something wrong in my reply. One just needs to read through the posts starting on page 1.You're better than this. What happened?
I think the initial video is utter BS. I've read the whole thread. That's why I posted what I did and then planned on taking a long break, but I realized I wasn't being fair to some so I came back to read to make sure I didn't miss something. I think you're giving it too much credence. He even said he didn't know what he was doing.I guess you are reading something wrong in my reply. One just needs to read through the posts starting on page 1.
My post is an honest post about excuses being laid and blame placed on the driver of the car and news organization that did a long distance factual road test. Ive posted all this through the pages if you read through them.
More or less blame placed on the people doing the test and not the vehicle for failing. Of course completely meritless.
Im surprised at your response, I cant help you nor have a discussion with you.I think the initial video is utter BS. I've read the whole thread. That's why I posted what I did and then planned on taking a long break, but I realized I wasn't being fair to some so I came back to read to make sure I didn't miss something. I think you're giving it too much credence. He even said he didn't know what he was doing.
Look, if you want a reason to hate EVs keep watching BS that helps you arrive there. It's called confirmation bias. You've convinced yourself of what they wanted to convince you of. I don't know what else to tell you. I feel like my original post still stands and if this is the continuous crap the EV forum is going to be here I think I'm out. There's no point in this.
I don't know what changed, but I'm sure it wasn't me.Im surprised at your response, I cant help you nor have a discussion with you.
That is long gone. 2035 is dropped by most pro EV countries.Yes for now. Maybe not after 2035.
ICE isn't going away. I don't believe it for a second. I think even California will walk it back. There will be plenty of EVs for those that want them, but rest assured no one is getting forced to drive them. You all don't have to convince yourselves and by default have to try and convince others that EVs suck. You can believe it, keep it to yourself, and buy whatever you like. Emissions will continue to tighten as they always have. We'll lose V8s for awhile until some new tech improves that brings them back. Aren't we seeing the end of the 3rd wave of muscle cars now? I'm sure we'll see something else too. That's happened as the EPA continues to crack down.That is long gone. 2035 is dropped by most pro EV countries.