Not fond of putting too many eggs in one basket myself. I prefer putting fewer eggs in more baskets. Not crazy about >4TB drives. A 1TB or 2 TB data drive is to my liking and a 1TB drive for the OS and programs. Dual HDD and SSD on the desktop PC, the same or a hybrid drive on the laptop. Backups to HDD and discs, no cloud for moi.I've never heard anyone say they wish they would have purchased a smaller capacity hard drive. (But I'm sure someone has.)
True, yet this example is a laptop, so unless there are multiple drive bays, this is a one-drive circumstance.Not fond of putting too many eggs in one basket myself. I prefer putting fewer eggs in more baskets. Not crazy about >4TB drives. A 1TB or 2 TB data drive is to my liking and a 1TB drive for the OS and programs. Dual HDD and SSD on the desktop PC, the same or a hybrid drive on the laptop. Backups to HDD and discs, no cloud for moi.
Like I said, a hybrid drive, an SSHD, is an option, even though it has its own problems.True, yet this example is a laptop, so unless there are multiple drive bays, this is a one-drive circumstance.
Yes, I have multiple drives in my desktop at home. Separate boot drive, "home" folder drive and another drive with VMs and such.
To me, that still offers a single point of failure as access to the drive is through common hardware and potentially less reliable due to increased complexity.Like I said, a hybrid drive, an SSHD, is an option, even though it has its own problems.
Of course, a hybrid drive is not a perfect solution. Better speed and safer data storage but when the drive dies it dies. But if your laptop only has one slot an SSHD is a good option, at least if speed is important. SSHDs are less and less popular because high-capacity SSDs are getting cheaper. I just don't trust them for long-term data storage. Powered-off SSDs are terrible for data storage. I know people who remove SSD data drives and store them with the expectation of coming back years later and finding the data intact. I regard any drive as inherently unreliable and rely on multiple backups on different types of storage mediums (HDD and archival M-Discs/BR).To me, that still offers a single point of failure as access to the drive is through common hardware and potentially less reliable due to increased complexity.
I'm thinking a bigger SSD, which one could partition is a more reliable solution. However, that's just an impression, I have no hard data to back up my opinion.
I just do weekly backups to my workstation. That's how I solve the problem.Of course, a hybrid drive is not a perfect solution. Better speed and safer data storage but when the drive dies it dies. But if your laptop only has one slot an SSHD is a good option, at least if speed is important. SSHDs are less and less popular because high-capacity SSDs are getting cheaper. I just don't trust them for long-term data storage. Powered-off SSDs are terrible for data storage. I know people who remove SSD data drives and store them with the expectation of coming back years later and finding the data intact. I regard any drive as inherently unreliable and rely on multiple backups on different types of storage mediums (HDD and archival M-Discs/BR).
In my experience, laptop SSHDs have an absolutely atrocious reliability record, at least the Hitachi drives Dell used in their Latitude laptops for a time before SSDs were big. No thanks.Like I said, a hybrid drive, an SSHD, is an option, even though it has its own problems.
From what I remember the free version wont let you copy from a bigger drive to a smaller.. which might be applicable here.Also check into Macrium Reflect, its been my goto for cloning.
Typically, hybrid drive is much more expensive than a dedicated ssd with external or internal HDD storage. The reason being the space limitation and algorithm complexity, and you cannot dedicate what to store where and the drive just go by statistics on how frequently you store something.Like I said, a hybrid drive, an SSHD, is an option, even though it has its own problems.
Not a concern. The laptop's cost far exceeds any drive choice.Typically, hybrid drive is much more expensive than a dedicated ssd with external or internal HDD storage.
On my laptop with the hybrid drive I can save to either the SSD or the HDD component. I have been using it exactly the same way I have been using my PCs.The reason being the space limitation and algorithm complexity, and you cannot dedicate what to store where and the drive just go by statistics on how frequently you store something.
I have been saying for years and including in this thread that I use the SSD only for programs and the HDD for data (including document files) and that's my general recommendation.I personally would store my large data in HDD and OS / program / document in SSD, but hybrid drives doesn't know what things are, only KBs of data in which sectors. Not always a good idea to let the drive decide for me.