2k3TRD:
No offense taken -- tone is sometimes difficult to manage in a written format. I do get a tad "burned out" on the "one size fits all" solutions offered by car magazine pundits who in this instance clearly haven't thought through what they're saying (except perhaps as to the one narrow scenario they generalize from). I agree about the Gen-I Prius; way to small for me too. Much of the confusion and error applies to the Gen-II car which is in effect a four-wheeled optical illusion. If it were as wide as a Camry, it would have virtually the same interior volume. The sloped nose and teardrop-hatchback form complete the illusion. Yet it still gets compared to Corollas and Civics. Yep, at 40k miles per year, it's a good choice almost from any view. Add to that the "delta" I'm experiencing coming from a very thirsty G35, and well, you can see why I'm so happy with the car.
No offense taken -- tone is sometimes difficult to manage in a written format. I do get a tad "burned out" on the "one size fits all" solutions offered by car magazine pundits who in this instance clearly haven't thought through what they're saying (except perhaps as to the one narrow scenario they generalize from). I agree about the Gen-I Prius; way to small for me too. Much of the confusion and error applies to the Gen-II car which is in effect a four-wheeled optical illusion. If it were as wide as a Camry, it would have virtually the same interior volume. The sloped nose and teardrop-hatchback form complete the illusion. Yet it still gets compared to Corollas and Civics. Yep, at 40k miles per year, it's a good choice almost from any view. Add to that the "delta" I'm experiencing coming from a very thirsty G35, and well, you can see why I'm so happy with the car.
